World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Psychology
USA
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Scientists 182 557 357 425 314877
Psychology 181 23 9 422 326304

Ed Diener publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ed Diener between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ed Diener published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2009. 3 of the 430 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2009. 1972: 2 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 4 publications 1976: 5 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 58 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
1972 2025

430 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ed Diener: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 2
1973 2
1974 1
1975 4
1976 5
1977 5
1978 4
1979 6
1980 2
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 4
1985 10
1986 7
1987 3
1988 1
1989 2
1990 3
1991 4
1992 3
1993 9
1994 2
1995 11
1996 5
1997 6
1998 9
1999 7
2000 12
2001 9
2002 13
2003 14
2004 10
2005 13
2006 8
2007 8
2008 11
2009 58
2010 10
2011 11
2012 12
2013 14
2014 18
2015 7
2016 8
2017 10
2018 17
2019 9
2020 19
2021 15
2022 2
2023 1
2024 0
2025 3
Total 430
Download as CSV

Ed Diener publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ed Diener sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–430 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 422 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50 422
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ed Diener D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ed Diener sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 144+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 181 D-Index — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98 181
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2013 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 2012 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Ed Diener was affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research primarily focused on the field of Psychology, with notable contributions in Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Safety Research.

The scientist's work covered multiple main topics, including Family and Disability Support Research, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research, Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues, Disability Education and Employment, Health disparities and outcomes, and Aging and Gerontology Research.

Ed Diener published extensively in several academic venues. Frequent publication venues included The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development, Milbank Quarterly, Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Personality Assessment, and Quality of Life Research.

Among the recent papers associated with their research interest were:

  • Life Satisfaction and Subsequent Physical, Behavioral, and Psychosocial Health in Older Adults (2021) in Milbank Quarterly
  • The manipulation of affect: A meta-analysis of affect induction procedures (2020) in Psychological Bulletin
  • Abbreviated Three-Item Versions of the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Harmony in Life Scale Yield as Strong Psychometric Properties as the Original Scales (2020) in Journal of Personality Assessment
  • Are all domains of life satisfaction equal? Differential associations with health and well-being in older adults (2021) in Quality of Life Research
  • Parent-identified strengths of autistic youth (2020) in Autism

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ed Diener included Anne V. Kirby, Cheryl Wright, Louis Tay, Eric S. Kim, and Scott Delaney.

Throughout their career, Ed Diener received several awards recognizing contributions to psychological science. These included the William James Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science in 2013, the APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology in 2012, and being named Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2012.

Best Publications

  • The Satisfaction With Life Scale.

    Ed Diener;Robert A. Emmons;Randy J. Larsen;Sharon Griffin

  • Personality, Culture, and Subjective Well-Being: Emotional and Cognitive Evaluations of Life

    Ed Diener;Shigehiro Oishi;Richard E. Lucas

  • Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress

    Ed Diener;Eunkook M. Suh;Richard E. Lucas;Heidi L. Smith

  • Subjective Well-being

    Ed Diener

  • Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index.

    Ed Diener

  • The Benefits of Frequent Positive Affect: Does Happiness Lead to Success?

    Sonja Lyubomirsky;Laura King;Ed Diener

  • Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology

    Daniel Kahneman;Edward Diener;Norbert Schwarz

  • New Well-Being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings.

    Ed Diener;Ed Diener;Derrick Wirtz;William Tov;Chu Kim-Prieto

  • Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale

    William Pavot;Ed Diener

  • Beyond Money Toward an Economy of Well-Being

    Ed Diener;Martin E.P. Seligman

  • Very Happy People

    Ed Diener;Martin E.P. Seligman

  • Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators

    Ed Diener;Eunkook Suh

  • Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and Life Satisfaction

    Ed Diener;Shigehiro Oishi;Richard E. Lucas

  • Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well‐Being Contributes to Health and Longevity

    Ed Diener;Micaela Y. Chan

  • Will Money Increase Subjective Well-Being?

    Ed Diener;Robert Biswas-Diener

  • Assessing Subjective Well-Being: Progress and Opportunities

    Ed Diener

  • Who Is Happy

    David G. Myers;Ed Diener

  • The independence of positive and negative affect.

    Ed Diener;Robert A. Emmons

  • Intensity and Frequency: Dimensions Underlying Positive and Negative Affect

    Ed Diener;Randy J. Larsen;Steven Levine;Robert A. Emmons

  • Discriminant validity of well-being measures.

    Richard E. Lucas;Ed Diener;Eunkook Suh

Frequent Co-Authors

Shigehiro Oishi
Shigehiro Oishi University of Chicago
Richard E. Lucas
Richard E. Lucas Michigan State University
Louis Tay
Louis Tay Purdue University West Lafayette
Eunkook M. Suh
Eunkook M. Suh Yonsei University
Ulrich Schimmack
Ulrich Schimmack University of Toronto
Robert A. Emmons
Robert A. Emmons University of California, Davis
John F. Helliwell
John F. Helliwell University of British Columbia
Michael Eid
Michael Eid Freie Universität Berlin
Randy J. Larsen
Randy J. Larsen Washington University in St. Louis
Martin E. P. Seligman
Martin E. P. Seligman University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree in the USA opens a wide range of career opportunities and alternative pathways in the social sciences. Graduates can explore many options, depending on their area of interest and level of education.

For those curious about what can you do with a psychology bachelor degree, entry-level roles in human resources, case management, or mental health support are popular choices. A more specialized path, such as earning a master’s, can lead to advanced positions.

If you’re interested in workplace psychology, there are a variety of jobs for masters in industrial organizational psychology including consultant, talent analyst, or training and development manager.

Many students also question what to do with a masters in sociology. This degree can lead to careers in research, policy analysis, nonprofit work, or education.

Broadening your perspective with social science courses can further enhance your skills and prepare you for interdisciplinary roles, making you more versatile in today’s diverse job market.

Best Scientists Citing Ed Diener

Recently Published Articles