World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ulrich Schimmack

Ulrich Schimmack

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
17031
World Ranking
3657
National Ranking
238

Ulrich Schimmack publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Schimmack sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ulrich Schimmack D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Schimmack sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich Schimmack is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their primary research field is Psychology, with a focus on several subfields including Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Speech and Hearing, Genetics, and areas related to Statistics, Probability, and Uncertainty.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, with notable emphasis on Veterinary Practice and Education Studies, Human-Animal Interaction Studies, Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews, Mental Health Research Topics, Agriculture and Farm Safety, Cultural Differences and Values, and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials.

Schimmack's recent publications illustrate the diversity and focus of their research. These include:

  • "Estimating Population Mean Power Under Conditions of Heterogeneity and Selection for Significance" (2020), published in Meta-Psychology
  • "A meta-psychological perspective on the decade of replication failures in social psychology." (2020), published in Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne
  • "Executive summary of the Merck Animal Health Veterinarian Wellbeing Study III and Veterinary Support Staff Study" (2022), published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
  • "Executive summary of the Merck Animal Health Veterinarian Wellbeing Study II" (2020), published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
  • "Invalid Claims About the Validity of Implicit Association Tests by Prisoners of the Implicit Social-Cognition Paradigm" (2021), published in Perspectives on Psychological Science

Collaborations are an important part of Schimmack's scientific activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • John O. Volk
  • Elizabeth B. Strand
  • Jason W. Payne
  • Addie Reinhard
  • Joseph F. Hahn

The scientist has published extensively in various journals. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
  • Meta-Psychology
  • Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement
  • PLoS ONE
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Well-Being for Public Policy

    Ed Diener;Richard Lucas;Ulrich Schimmack;John Helliwell

  • Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: integrating process models of life satisfaction.

    Ulrich Schimmack;Phanikiran Radhakrishnan;Shigehiro Oishi;Vivian Dzokoto

  • Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: the use of chronically accessible and stable sources

    Ulrich Schimmack;Ed Diener;Shigehiro Oishi

  • Personality and Life Satisfaction: A Facet-Level Analysis

    Ulrich Schimmack;Shigehiro Oishi;R. Michael Furr;David C. Funder

  • The structure of subjective well-being.

    Ulrich Schimmack

  • The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.

    Ulrich Schimmack

  • Individualism: A Valid and Important Dimension of Cultural Differences Between Nations

    Ulrich Schimmack;Shigehiro Oishi;Ed Diener

  • Attentional interference effects of emotional pictures: threat, negativity, or arousal?

    Ulrich Schimmack;Douglas Derryberry

  • The Measurement of Values and Individualism-Collectivism

    Shigehiro Oishi;Ulrich Schimmack;Ed Diener;Eunkook M. Suh

  • The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments.

    Ulrich Schimmack;Shigehiro Oishi

  • Cultural influences on the relation between pleasant emotions and unpleasant emotions: Asian dialectic philosophies or individualism-collectivism?

    Ulrich Schimmack;Shigehiro Oishi;Ed Diener

  • Feelings and Perceptions of Happiness and Sadness Induced by Music: Similarities, Differences, and Mixed Emotions

    Patrick G. Hunter;E. Glenn Schellenberg;Ulrich Schimmack

  • The Influence of Environment and Personality on the Affective and Cognitive Component of Subjective Well-being

    Ulrich Schimmack;Jürgen Schupp;Gert G. Wagner

  • Affect Intensity: Separating Intensity and Frequency in Repeatedly Measured Affect

    Ulrich Schimmack;Ed Diener

  • Predictive validity of explicit and implicit self-esteem for subjective well-being

    Ulrich Schimmack;Ed Diener

  • Dimensional models of core affect: A quantitative comparison by means of structural equation modeling.

    Ulrich Schimmack;Alexander Grob

  • Pleasure, displeasure, and mixed feelings: Are semantic opposites mutually exclusive?

    Ulrich Schimmack

  • The Implicit Association Test: A Method in Search of a Construct:

    Ulrich Schimmack

  • Stability and change of personality traits, self-esteem, and well-being: Introducing the meta-analytic stability and change model of retest correlations.

    Ivana Anusic;Ulrich Schimmack

  • The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: the halo-alpha-beta model.

    Ivana Anusic;Ulrich Schimmack;Rebecca T. Pinkus;Penelope Lockwood

  • Mixed affective responses to music with conflicting cues

    Patrick G. Hunter;E. Glenn Schellenberg;Ulrich Schimmack

  • The role of attention and relatedness in emotionally enhanced memory.

    Deborah Talmi;Ulrich Schimmack;Theone Paterson;Morris Moscovitch

Frequent Co-Authors

Ed Diener
Ed Diener University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Shigehiro Oishi
Shigehiro Oishi University of Chicago
Richard E. Lucas
Richard E. Lucas Michigan State University
John F. Helliwell
John F. Helliwell University of British Columbia
Joel T. Nigg
Joel T. Nigg Oregon Health & Science University
Michelle M. Martel
Michelle M. Martel University of Kentucky
Morris Moscovitch
Morris Moscovitch University of Toronto
Cecilia Cheng
Cecilia Cheng University of Hong Kong
E. Glenn Schellenberg
E. Glenn Schellenberg University of Toronto
Eunkook M. Suh
Eunkook M. Suh Yonsei University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of career paths, including social work, counseling, and mental health advocacy. Many students choose to pursue online psychology or social work programs, which offer flexibility for working professionals and those needing to balance other commitments.

Each state in the USA has specific education and licensing requirements for social workers. For instance, the requirements to be a social worker in Utah may differ from other regions, so it’s important to research your local regulations. Those interested in the Northeast can review the process for becoming a social worker in Vermont.

Similarly, if you plan to practice in Virginia, be aware of the Virginia social work education requirements. On the West Coast, you can learn about the Washington social work education requirements to better understand your options.

Exploring accredited online degree programs can help you meet these requirements while preparing for a fulfilling career in the field of psychology or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Schimmack

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles