World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
11470
World Ranking
6093
National Ranking
289

Maike Luhmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maike Luhmann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Maike Luhmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maike Luhmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maike Luhmann is affiliated with Ruhr University Bochum in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a focus on social, experimental, and clinical psychology. Their research spans a variety of subfields and topics addressing psychological well-being, mental health, and personality traits.

Their publication record includes works in prominent journals, particularly the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, where they have published 10 papers. Other frequent publication venues include the European Journal of Personality, PLoS ONE, PsycTESTS Dataset, and the Journal of Research in Personality.

Luhmann's research primarily covers several key topics:

  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics

They have coauthored multiple papers with several researchers, including Peter Haehner, Susanne Buecker, Ina Faßbender, Julia Krasko, and Jaap J. A. Denissen, highlighting a collaborative research approach.

Some of the recent papers associated with or thematically related to their research interests are:

  • "Loneliness and the Big Five Personality Traits: A Meta-Analysis," 2020, European Journal of Personality
  • "Post-traumatic growth as positive personality change: Challenges, opportunities, and recommendations," 2020, Journal of Personality
  • "Loneliness from young adulthood to old age: Explaining age differences in loneliness," 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • "Is loneliness in emerging adults increasing over time? A preregistered cross-temporal meta-analysis and systematic review," 2021, Psychological Bulletin
  • "The development of loneliness through adolescence and young adulthood: Its nature, correlates, and midlife outcomes," 2020, Developmental Psychology

Their broad engagement with psychological well-being and personality underscores a multidisciplinary interest that connects social and clinical aspects of psychology with health outcomes and behavioral interventions.

Best Publications

  • Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: a meta-analysis.

    Maike Luhmann;Wilhelm Hofmann;Michael Eid;Richard E. Lucas

  • Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age.

    Maike Luhmann;Louise C. Hawkley

  • Yes, But Are They Happy? Effects of Trait Self‐Control on Affective Well‐Being and Life Satisfaction

    Wilhelm Hofmann;Maike Luhmann;Rachel R Fisher;Kathleen D. Vohs

  • Subjective Well-Being and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis

    Susanne Bücker;Sevim Nuraydin;Bianca A. Simonsmeier;Michael Schneider

  • What Drives Adult Personality Development? A Comparison of Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence:

    Jule Specht;Wiebke Bleidorn;Jaap J. A. Denissen;Marie Hennecke

  • Loneliness and the Big Five Personality Traits: A Meta–Analysis:

    Susanne Buecker;Marlies Maes;Jaap J. A. Denissen;Maike Luhmann

  • Social connectedness as a source and consequence of meaning in life

    Olga Stavrova;Maike Luhmann

  • Is loneliness in emerging adults increasing over time? A preregistered cross-temporal meta-analysis and systematic review.

    Unknown

  • The Prospective Effect of Life Satisfaction on Life Events

    Maike Luhmann;Richard E. Lucas;Michael Eid;Ed Diener

  • Transactions between life events and personality traits across the adult lifespan

    Jaap J. A. Denissen;Maike Luhmann;Joanne M. Chung;Wiebke Bleidorn

  • Studying Changes in Life Circumstances and Personality: It's About Time

    Maike Luhmann;Ulrich Orth;Jule Specht;Christian Kandler

  • Post-traumatic growth as positive personality change: Challenges, opportunities, and recommendations.

    Eranda Jayawickreme;Frank J. Infurna;Kinan Alajak;Laura E.R. Blackie

  • The policy relevance of personality traits

    Wiebke Bleidorn;Patrick L. Hill;Mitja D. Back;Jaap J. A. Denissen

  • Does it really feel the same? Changes in life satisfaction following repeated life events.

    Maike Luhmann;Michael Eid

  • Loneliness from young adulthood to old age: Explaining age differences in loneliness:

    Louise C. Hawkley;Susanne Buecker;Till Kaiser;Maike Luhmann

  • Time frames and the distinction between affective and cognitive well-being.

    Maike Luhmann;Louise C. Hawkley;Michael Eid;John T. Cacioppo

  • The Development of loneliness through adolescence and young adulthood: Its nature, correlates, and midlife outcomes

    Tilmann von Soest;Maike Luhmann;Denis Gerstorf

  • Development of loneliness in midlife and old age: Its nature and correlates.

    Tilmann von Soest;Maike Luhmann;Thomas Hansen;Denis Gerstorf

  • On the consistency of personality types across adulthood: latent profile analyses in two large-scale panel studies.

    Jule Specht;Maike Luhmann;Christian Geiser

  • Stability and variability in the relationship between subjective well-being and income

    Maike Luhmann;Ulrich Schimmack;Michael Eid

  • A dimensional taxonomy of perceived characteristics of major life events.

    Maike Luhmann;Ina Fassbender;Mark Alcock;Peter Haehner

  • Is the association between various emotion-regulation skills and mental health mediated by the ability to modify emotions? Results from two cross-sectional studies

    Matthias Berking;Christine Poppe;Maike Luhmann;Peggilee Wupperman;Peggilee Wupperman

  • Openness to experience and culture-openness transactions across the lifespan

    Ted Schwaba;Maike Luhmann;Jaap Denissen;Joanne Mee Hae Chung

Frequent Co-Authors

Jaap J. A. Denissen
Jaap J. A. Denissen Utrecht University
Michael Eid
Michael Eid Freie Universität Berlin
Wiebke Bleidorn
Wiebke Bleidorn University of Zurich
Richard E. Lucas
Richard E. Lucas Michigan State University
Ulrich Orth
Ulrich Orth University of Bern
Louise C. Hawkley
Louise C. Hawkley University of Chicago
Christian Geiser
Christian Geiser Utah State University
John T. Cacioppo
John T. Cacioppo University of Chicago
Christian Kandler
Christian Kandler University of Bremen
Wolff Schlotz
Wolff Schlotz Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens the door to an array of specialized online degree options and diverse careers. Many students choose to focus on unique fields that align with their interests and ambitions.

For those passionate about sports and performance, a sports psychology career path offers opportunities to work with athletes, teams, and coaches to boost mental well-being and optimize performance. Meanwhile, individuals interested in advanced study can discover the full spectrum of what can you do with a masters in psychology—from counseling roles to positions in research, healthcare, education, and beyond.

Those intrigued by the intersection of psychology and law can pursue masters in forensic psychology jobs, ranging from criminal profiling to working with law enforcement agencies. Alternatively, if business and organizations are your focus, find out what can you do with a masters in io psychology and consider careers in talent management, human resources, organizational consulting, and leadership development.

No matter your interest, online psychology degrees can prepare you for highly rewarding pathways tailored to your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Maike Luhmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles