World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
9298
World Ranking
5694
National Ranking
3090

Jeffrey M. Lohr publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey M. Lohr sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jeffrey M. Lohr D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey M. Lohr sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeffrey M. Lohr is affiliated with the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville in the United States. Their academic profile shows a focus on research within this institution.

While there is no available data on specific recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues linked to Jeffrey M. Lohr, they are recognized as an active contributor to their field through ongoing scholarly activities.

The absence of listed main and subfields of study or defined main research topics suggests that detailed specialization information is not publicly documented for this scientist at this time.

Similarly, there are no recorded book publications or awards connected to this individual, indicating that such information has either not been published or is not retrievable from the current sources.

Jeffrey M. Lohr is currently active and not deceased. The available data positions them as a professional engaged in academic research within a recognized American university.

Best Publications

  • The Disgust Scale: Item Analysis, Factor Structure, and Suggestions for Refinement.

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Nathan L. Williams;David F. Tolin;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz

  • A large sample empirical typology of male spouse abusers and its relationship to dimensions of abuse.

    L. Kevin Hamberger;Jeffrey M. Lohr;Dennis Bonge;David F. Tolin

  • Disgust, fear, and the anxiety disorders: a critical review.

    Josh M. Cisler;Bunmi O. Olatunji;Jeffrey M. Lohr

  • Secondary trauma symptoms in clinicians: a critical review of the construct, specificity, and implications for trauma-focused treatment.

    Lisa S. Elwood;Juliette Mott;Juliette Mott;Jeffrey M. Lohr;Tara E. Galovski

  • Science and pseudoscience in the development of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Implications for clinical psychology

    James D Herbert;Scott O Lilienfeld;Jeffrey M Lohr;Robert W Montgomery

  • Disgust and disgust sensitivity in blood-injection-injury and spider phobia.

    David F. Tolin;Jeffrey M. Lohr;Craig N. Sawchuk;Thomas C. Lee

  • Disgust domains in the prediction of contamination fear.

    Bunmi O Olatunji;Craig N Sawchuk;Jeffrey M Lohr;Peter J de Jong

  • An Empirical Classification of Motivations for Domestic Violence

    L. Kevin Hamberger;Jeffrey M. Lohr;Dennis Bonge;David F. Tolin

  • Multimodal assessment of disgust in contamination-related obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Jeffrey M. Lohr;Craig N. Sawchuk;David F. Tolin

  • Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Steven Jay Lynn;Jeffrey M. Lohr

  • Disgust sensitivity and contamination fears in spider and blood-injection-injury phobias.

    Craig N Sawchuk;Jeffrey M Lohr;David F Tolin;Thomas C Lee

  • The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-Revised: Psychometric properties and specificity in relation to anxiety disorder symptoms

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Josh M. Cisler;Brett J. Deacon;Kevin Connolly

  • Differential habituation of fear and disgust during repeated exposure to threat-relevant stimuli in contamination-based OCD: an analogue study

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Jeffrey Willems;Jeffrey M. Lohr

  • Emotional responding to fearful and disgusting stimuli in specific phobics

    Craig N Sawchuk;Jeffrey M Lohr;David H Westendorf;Suzanne A Meunier

  • A functional analysis of danger and safety signals in anxiety disorders

    Jeffrey M. Lohr;Bunmi O. Olatunji;Craig N. Sawchuk

  • Disgust sensitivity as a mediator of the sex differences in contamination fears

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Craig N. Sawchuk;Willem A. Arrindell;Jeffrey M. Lohr

  • Efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Implications for behavior therapy

    Jeffrey M. Lohr;David F. Tolin;Scott O. Lilienfeld

  • Predictors of treatment dropout from a spouse abuse abatement program.

    L. Kevin Hamberger;Jeffrey M. Lohr;Mark Gottlieb

  • Exposure to disgust-evoking imagery and information processing biases in blood-injection-injury phobia.

    Craig N. Sawchuk;Jeffrey M. Lohr;Thomas C. Lee;David F. Tolin

  • Visual avoidance in specific phobia

    David F. Tolin;Jeffrey M. Lohr;Thomas C. Lee;Craig N. Sawchuk

  • Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology: Initial thoughts, reflections, and considerations.

    Scott O. Lilienfeld;Steven Jay Lynn;Jeffrey M. Lohr

Frequent Co-Authors

Bunmi O. Olatunji
Bunmi O. Olatunji Vanderbilt University
Josh M. Cisler
Josh M. Cisler University of Wisconsin–Madison
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
L. Kevin Hamberger
L. Kevin Hamberger Medical College of Wisconsin
David F. Tolin
David F. Tolin Yale University
Grant James Devilly
Grant James Devilly Griffith University
Ronald A. Kleinknecht
Ronald A. Kleinknecht Western Washington University
Jonathan S. Abramowitz
Jonathan S. Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Steven Jay Lynn
Steven Jay Lynn Binghamton University
Richard J. McNally
Richard J. McNally Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding career paths, especially in the field of school counseling. The journey to becoming a school counselor varies by state, with each location having its own specific educational and certification requirements.

For example, Oregon school counselor education requirements emphasize a graduate degree in counseling, as well as a state-approved program. Meanwhile, those interested in working in Pennsylvania should review Pennsylvania school counselor certification requirements for guidance on the state’s unique pathway.

Similarly, Rhode Island school counselor certification requirements outline the need for specialized coursework and exams, while South Carolina school counselor education requirements require an advanced degree and supervised practice.

Many universities now offer online Psychology and counseling programs, making it easier for students nationwide to meet these prerequisites. Whether your goal is to become a licensed counselor or pursue another psychology-related career, understanding state-specific requirements is key to a successful professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey M. Lohr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles