World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Netherlands
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
128
Citations
49141
World Ranking
190
National Ranking
6

Peter Muris publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Muris sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 610 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter Muris D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Muris sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Peter Muris is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands and specializes in psychology with a focus on clinical psychology. Their research encompasses various subfields including cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, education, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist has contributed to topics such as child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, memory processes and influences, mindfulness and compassion interventions, COVID-19 and mental health, autism spectrum disorder research, personality traits and psychology, and deception detection and forensic psychology.

Their recent publications include:

  • The Process of Science: A Critical Evaluation of more than 15 Years of Research on Self-Compassion with the Self-Compassion Scale (2020), published in Mindfulness
  • Self-Esteem and Self-Compassion: A Narrative Review and Meta-Analysis on Their Links to Psychological Problems and Well-Being (2023), published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management
  • Selective Mutism and Its Relations to Social Anxiety Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder (2021), published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
  • Deconstructing Self-Compassion: How the Continued Use of the Total Score of the Self-Compassion Scale Hinders Studying a Protective Construct Within the Context of Psychopathology and Stress (2022), published in Mindfulness

Peter Muris frequently publishes in journals such as:

  • Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development
  • Mindfulness
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Psychology Research and Behavior Management

Co-authorship appears regularly with several researchers, most notably:

  • Henry Otgaar
  • Cor Meesters
  • Thomas H. Ollendick
  • Chunlin Li
  • David Pineda

Best Publications

  • The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)--further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents.

    Peter Muris;Cor Meesters;Frank van den Berg

  • A Brief Questionnaire for Measuring Self-Efficacy in Youths

    Peter Muris

  • The Malevolent Side of Human Nature: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Review of the Literature on the Dark Triad (Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy)

    Peter Muris;Harald Merckelbach;Henry Otgaar;Ewout Meijer

  • Relationships between self-efficacy and symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression in a normal adolescent sample

    Peter Muris

  • The Role of Temperament in the Etiology of Child Psychopathology

    Peter Muris;Thomas H. Ollendick

  • Three traditional and three new childhood anxiety questionnaires: their reliability and validity in a normal adolescent sample

    Peter Muris;Harald Merckelbach;Thomas Ollendick;Neville King

  • Mediating effects of rumination and worry on the links between neuroticism, anxiety and depression

    Peter Muris;Jeffrey Roelofs;Eric Rassin;Ingmar Franken

  • Differences in attention to food and food intake between overweight/obese and normal-weight females under conditions of hunger and satiety.

    Ilse M.T. Nijs;Peter Muris;Anja S. Euser;Ingmar H.A. Franken

  • Protection or Vulnerability? A Meta-Analysis of the Relations Between the Positive and Negative Components of Self-Compassion and Psychopathology.

    Peter Muris;Peter Muris;Nicola Petrocchi

  • Comorbid Anxiety Symptoms in Children with Pervasive Developmental Disorders

    Peter Muris;Pim Steerneman;Harald Merckelbach;Irit Holdrinet

  • The Creative Experiences Questionnaire (CEQ): A brief self-report measure of fantasy proneness

    Harald Merckelbach;Robert Horselenberg;Peter Muris

  • Fears, worries, and scary dreams in 4- to 12-year-old children: their content, developmental pattern, and origins.

    Peter Muris;Harald Merckelbach;Björn Gadet;Vénique Moulaert

  • The assessment of anhedonia in clinical and non-clinical populations: Further validation of the Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)

    Ingmar H.A. Franken;Eric Rassin;Peter Muris

  • The Self-Perception Profile for children: further evidence for its factor structure, reliability, and validity

    Peter Muris;Cor Meesters;Petra Fijen

  • Individual differences in thought suppression. The white bear suppression inventory: Factor structure, reliability, validity and correlates

    Peter Muris;Harald Merckelbach;Robert Horselenberg

  • Individual differences in reward sensitivity are related to food craving and relative body weight in healthy women

    Ingmar H.A. Franken;Peter Muris

  • Self-reported attachment style, attachment quality, and symptoms of anxiety and depression in young adolescents.

    Peter Muris;Cor Meesters;Marion van Melick;Linda Zwambag

  • Autobiographical memories become less vivid and emotional after eye movements

    Marcel van den Hout;Peter Muris;Elske Salemink;Merel Kindt

  • Internalizing and Externalizing Problems as Correlates of Self-Reported Attachment Style and Perceived Parental Rearing in Normal Adolescents

    Peter Muris;Cor Meesters;Silvia van den Berg

  • On the Links Between Attachment Style, Parental Rearing Behaviors, and Internalizing and Externalizing Problems in Non-Clinical Children

    Jeffrey Roelofs;Cor Meesters;Mijke ter Huurne;Lotte Bamelis

  • The Developmental Psychopathology of Anxiety

    Peter Muris;Harald Merckelbach

Frequent Co-Authors

Harald Merckelbach
Harald Merckelbach Maastricht University
Cor Meesters
Cor Meesters Maastricht University
Birgit Mayer
Birgit Mayer Erasmus University Rotterdam
Eric Rassin
Eric Rassin Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ingmar H.A. Franken
Ingmar H.A. Franken Erasmus University Rotterdam
Thomas H. Ollendick
Thomas H. Ollendick Virginia Tech
Peter J. de Jong
Peter J. de Jong University of Groningen
Jeffrey Roelofs
Jeffrey Roelofs Maastricht University
Arjan E. R. Bos
Arjan E. R. Bos The Open University
Henk G. Schmidt
Henk G. Schmidt Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in the broader helping professions, psychology often goes hand in hand with social work and related fields. Pursuing an online degree provides flexibility for busy students, working professionals, or those balancing family and career obligations.

Social work, in particular, opens doors to diverse roles such as case management, counseling, healthcare advocacy, and crisis intervention. Accredited online degree programs are available across the country, allowing students to tailor their education to specific communities or focus areas. For example, you can explore top online social work degrees in Waco or review the best social work degree programs in Alabama to find the right fit for your goals.

Additionally, strong programs can be found regionally, such as the best social work programs in Arkansas and the best social work degrees in Columbus. These options help students connect with local communities and gain practical, real-world experience.

A psychology background, combined with online study options in social work, creates a solid foundation for a variety of rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Muris

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles