World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7425 6925 4014 3649 130 11033

Josh M. Cisler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Josh M. Cisler between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Josh M. Cisler published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2025. 33 of the 171 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2025. 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 19 publications
2007 2025

171 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Josh M. Cisler: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 6
2008 3
2009 7
2010 10
2011 8
2012 6
2013 7
2014 10
2015 6
2016 2
2017 5
2018 11
2019 10
2020 11
2021 18
2022 8
2023 10
2024 14
2025 19
Total 171
Download as CSV

Josh M. Cisler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josh M. Cisler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 130
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Josh M. Cisler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josh M. Cisler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Josh M. Cisler is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a focus on clinical psychology and cognitive neuroscience among other subfields.

Their work extensively addresses several main topics, including:

  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Cisler has contributed to numerous publications over the years, with a notable presence in several academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Recent papers highlight their engagement with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and related areas. Some of these publications are:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and the Developing Adolescent Brain, 2020, Biological Psychiatry
  • Laboratory models of post-traumatic stress disorder: The elusive bridge to translation, 2022, Neuron
  • Differential Patterns of Delayed Emotion Circuit Maturation in Abused Girls With and Without Internalizing Psychopathology, 2021, American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Exercise-induced increases in Anandamide and BDNF during extinction consolidation contribute to reduced threat following reinstatement: Preliminary evidence from a randomized controlled trial, 2021, Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • Altered large-scale functional brain organization in posttraumatic stress disorder: A comprehensive review of univariate and network-level neurocircuitry models of PTSD, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical

Collaboration appears to be a significant component of Cisler's research process. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Marisa Ross
  • Kevin M. Crombie
  • Ryan J. Herringa
  • Joseph E. Dunsmoor
  • Chadi G. Abdallah

Their interdisciplinary contributions span experimental and cognitive psychology, behavioral neuroscience, and epidemiology, emphasizing the clinical aspects of psychological trauma and neural mechanisms underlying stress and memory.

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

    Josh M. Cisler;Ernst H.W. Koster

  • Quality of life in the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Josh M. Cisler;David F. Tolin

  • Emotion Regulation and the Anxiety Disorders: An Integrative Review.

    Josh M. Cisler;Bunmi O. Olatunji;Matthew T. Feldner;John P. Forsyth

  • Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders: A Review of Meta-Analytic Findings

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Josh M. Cisler;Brett J. Deacon

  • Phenomenological characteristics of attentional biases towards threat: A critical review.

    Josh M. Cisler;Amy K. Bacon;Nathan L. Williams

  • Disgust, fear, and the anxiety disorders: a critical review.

    Josh M. Cisler;Bunmi O. Olatunji;Jeffrey M. Lohr

  • Emotion Regulation and Anxiety Disorders

    Josh M. Cisler;Bunmi O. Olatunji

  • Is disgust associated with psychopathology? Emerging research in the anxiety disorders

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Josh Cisler;Dean McKay;Mary L. Phillips;Mary L. Phillips

  • The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-Revised: Psychometric properties and specificity in relation to anxiety disorder symptoms

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Josh M. Cisler;Brett J. Deacon;Kevin Connolly

  • A comparison of statistical methods for detecting context-modulated functional connectivity in fMRI.

    Josh M. Cisler;Keith Bush;J. Scott Steele

  • Differential functional connectivity within an emotion regulation neural network among individuals resilient and susceptible to the depressogenic effects of early life stress.

    J. M. Cisler;G. A. James;S. Tripathi;T. Mletzko

  • Exposure to interpersonal violence and risk for PTSD, depression, delinquency, and binge drinking among adolescents: Data from the NSA-R

    Josh M. Cisler;Angela M. Begle;Ananda B. Amstadter;Heidi S. Resnick

  • Components of attentional biases in contamination fear: evidence for difficulty in disengagement.

    Josh M. Cisler;Bunmi O. Olatunji

  • The Emotional Stroop Task and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: a Meta-Analysis

    Josh M. Cisler;Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Thomas G. Adams;Kimberly A. Babson

  • A meta-analysis of the influence of comorbidity on treatment outcome in the anxiety disorders.

    Bunmi O. Olatunji;Josh M. Cisler;David F. Tolin

  • Childhood maltreatment is associated with a sex-dependent functional reorganization of a brain inhibitory control network

    Amanda Elton;Shanti P. Tripathi;Tanja Mletzko;Jonathan Young

  • Attentional bias differences between fear and disgust: Implications for the role of disgust in disgust-related anxiety disorders

    Josh M. Cisler;Bunmi O. Olatunji;Jeffrey M. Lohr;Nathan L. Williams

  • Neural Processing Correlates of Assaultive Violence Exposure and PTSD Symptoms during Implicit Threat Processing: A Network Level Analysis among Adolescent Girls

    Josh M. Cisler;J. Scott Steele;Sonet Smitherman;Jennifer K. Lenow

  • Prevalence and Correlates of Poor Self-Rated Health in the United States: The National Elder Mistreatment Study

    Ananda B. Amstadter;Angela Moreland Begle;Josh M. Cisler;Melba A. Hernandez

  • Altered functional connectivity of the insular cortex across prefrontal networks in cocaine addiction.

    Josh M. Cisler;Amanda Elton;Ashley P. Kennedy;Jonathan Young

Frequent Co-Authors

Bunmi O. Olatunji
Bunmi O. Olatunji Vanderbilt University
Jeffrey M. Lohr
Jeffrey M. Lohr University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Ananda B. Amstadter
Ananda B. Amstadter Virginia Commonwealth University
Carla Kmett Danielson
Carla Kmett Danielson Medical University of South Carolina
Benjamin E. Saunders
Benjamin E. Saunders Medical University of South Carolina
Ron Acierno
Ron Acierno The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Dean G. Kilpatrick
Dean G. Kilpatrick Medical University of South Carolina
Brett J. Deacon
Brett J. Deacon University of Wollongong
Katie A. McLaughlin
Katie A. McLaughlin University of Oregon
Mary L. Phillips
Mary L. Phillips University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and fulfilling career pathways. Many psychology graduates choose to specialize in support-focused professions such as speech-language pathology, where the demand for skilled practitioners is steadily increasing.

For those interested in becoming a speech therapist in Texas, you must complete both academic coursework and clinical experience to meet state licensure requirements. Similarly, Utah speech pathologist certification requirements include earning a master's degree, supervised practice, and passing national exams. These steps ensure practitioners are well-qualified to help clients overcome communication disorders.

Regional differences are important, so if you are considering becoming a speech therapist in Vermont, or exploring how to become a speech language pathologist in Virginia, be sure to carefully review each state’s educational and licensing standards. Many universities now offer flexible online degree options, making advanced training in psychology and speech pathology more accessible than ever for aspiring professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Josh M. Cisler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles