World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
72
Citations
21326
World Ranking
2048
National Ranking
82

Matthias Berking publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Berking sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 288 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Matthias Berking D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Berking sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthias Berking is affiliated with the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a notable concentration in subfields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, and General Health Professions.

Their work addresses several key topics including Digital Mental Health Interventions, Mental Health Research Topics, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Mental Health Treatment and Access, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Impact of Technology on Adolescents, and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes.

Berking has contributed extensively to academic journals, frequently publishing in venues such as:

  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Internet Interventions
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • JMIR Mental Health
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Among their recent published papers are:

  • Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Care for Adults in Treatment for Depression and Anxiety: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Psychological interventions to improve sleep in college students: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, 2020, Journal of Sleep Research
  • A Gamified Smartphone-Based Intervention for Depression: Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial, 2021, JMIR Mental Health
  • A Web- and Mobile-Based Intervention for Comorbid, Recurrent Depression in Patients With Chronic Back Pain on Sick Leave (Get.Back): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial on Feasibility, User Satisfaction, and Effectiveness, 2020, JMIR Mental Health
  • Effectiveness and Moderators of an Internet-Based Mobile-Supported Stress Management Intervention as a Universal Prevention Approach: Randomized Controlled Trial, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research

Berking has collaborated repeatedly with several coauthors, reflecting extended research partnerships. Frequent coauthors include:

  • David Daniel Ebert
  • Harald Baumeister
  • Kiona K. Weisel
  • Lena Schindler-Gmelch
  • Anna-Carlotta Zarski

Best Publications

  • A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments.

    Pim Cuijpers;Matthias Berking;Gerhard Andersson;Leanne Quigley

  • Emotion regulation and mental health: recent findings, current challenges, and future directions.

    Matthias Berking;Peggilee Wupperman

  • Emotion-regulation skills as a treatment target in psychotherapy

    Matthias Berking;Peggilee Wupperman;Alexander Reichardt;Tanja Pejic

  • Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Marit Sijbrandij;Sander Koole;Marcus Huibers

  • Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Youth: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Outcome Trials

    David Daniel Ebert;Anna-Carlotta Zarski;Helen Christensen;Yvonne Stikkelbroek

  • Deficits in emotion-regulation skills predict alcohol use during and after cognitive-behavioral therapy for alcohol dependence.

    Matthias Berking;Matthias Margraf;David Ebert;Peggilee Wupperman

  • Self-compassion as an emotion regulation strategy in major depressive disorder.

    Alice Diedrich;Michaela Grant;Stefan G. Hofmann;Wolfgang Hiller

  • Internet interventions for mental health in university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Mathias Harrer;Sophia H. Adam;Harald Baumeister;Pim Cuijpers

  • Standalone smartphone apps for mental health—a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Kiona K. Weisel;Lukas M. Fuhrmann;Matthias Berking;Harald Baumeister

  • The benefit of web- and computer-based interventions for stress : A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Elena Heber;David Daniel Ebert;Dirk Lehr;Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers

  • Emotion regulation predicts symptoms of depression over five years.

    Matthias Berking;Matthias Berking;Carolin M. Wirtz;Carolin M. Wirtz;Jennifer Svaldi;Stefan G. Hofmann

  • Self-Conscious Emotions and Depression: Rumination Explains Why Shame But Not Guilt is Maladaptive

    Ulrich Orth;Matthias Berking;Simone Burkhardt

  • Emotion Regulation Skills Training Enhances the Efficacy of Inpatient Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Matthias Berking;David Ebert;Pim Cuijpers;Stefan G Hofmann

  • Affect Regulation Training

    Matthias Berking;Brian Whitley

  • Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;David Daniel Ebert;Liesje Donkin;Heleen Riper

  • Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Care for Adults in Treatment for Depression and Anxiety : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Anne Etzelmueller;Christiaan Vis;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Harald Baumeister

  • Does cognitive behaviour therapy have an enduring effect that is superior to keeping patients on continuation pharmacotherapy? A meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Steven D Hollon;Annemieke van Straten;Claudi Bockting

  • Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur standardisierten Selbsteinschätzung emotionaler Kompetenzen (SEK-27)

    Matthias Berking;Hansjörg Znoj

  • Treatment of comorbid alcohol use disorders and depression with cognitive-behavioural therapy and motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis

    Heleen Riper;Heleen Riper;Gerhard Andersson;Sarah B. Hunter;Jessica de Wit

  • Increasing the acceptance of internet-based mental health interventions in primary care patients with depressive symptoms. A randomized controlled trial

    D.D. Ebert;D.D. Ebert;D.D. Ebert;M. Berking;P. Cuijpers;D. Lehr

  • Enhancing emotion-regulation skills in police officers: Results of a pilot controlled study.

    Matthias Berking;Caroline Meier;Peggilee Wupperman

  • DSM-IV und DSM-5: Was hat sich tatsächlich verändert?

    Anna M. Ehret;Matthias Berking

Frequent Co-Authors

David Daniel Ebert
David Daniel Ebert Technical University of Munich
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dirk Lehr
Dirk Lehr Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Harald Baumeister
Harald Baumeister University of Ulm
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Filip Smit
Filip Smit Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Winfried Rief
Winfried Rief Philipp University of Marburg
Stefan G. Hofmann
Stefan G. Hofmann Philipp University of Marburg
Randy P. Auerbach
Randy P. Auerbach Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens the door to diverse career opportunities. Many students aim to become mental health professionals, as demand for qualified counselors is growing nationwide. Online programs provide the flexibility to balance studies with work or family commitments while building essential skills.

Each state and city may have different requirements for licensure and practice. If you want to become a mental health counselor in Irvine or learn about how to become a mental health counselor in Irving, it's important to review local regulations. Similarly, pathways can look different if you plan to become a mental health counselor in Jacksonville or want to find out how to become a mental health counselor in Jersey City.

Whether you are interested in clinical practice, research, or community outreach, online psychology degrees can help launch or advance your career. Assess local requirements, accredited programs, and specific career pathways to make an informed decision about your educational journey.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Berking

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles