World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 72 2048 1857 82 79 288 21326

Matthias Berking publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthias Berking between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthias Berking published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 15.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2014. 14 of the 366 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2014. 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 16 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 49 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 38 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 1 publication
2003 2026

366 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthias Berking: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 3
2004 2
2005 5
2006 7
2007 5
2008 8
2009 3
2010 11
2011 1
2012 16
2013 31
2014 49
2015 27
2016 25
2017 38
2018 19
2019 18
2020 12
2021 15
2022 11
2023 22
2024 24
2025 13
2026 1
Total 366
Download as CSV

Matthias Berking publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Berking sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 288 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 288
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthias Berking D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Berking sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 72
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthias Berking is affiliated with the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a notable concentration in subfields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, and General Health Professions.

Their work addresses several key topics including Digital Mental Health Interventions, Mental Health Research Topics, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Mental Health Treatment and Access, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Impact of Technology on Adolescents, and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes.

Berking has contributed extensively to academic journals, frequently publishing in venues such as:

  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Internet Interventions
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • JMIR Mental Health
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Among their recent published papers are:

  • Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Care for Adults in Treatment for Depression and Anxiety: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Psychological interventions to improve sleep in college students: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, 2020, Journal of Sleep Research
  • A Gamified Smartphone-Based Intervention for Depression: Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial, 2021, JMIR Mental Health
  • A Web- and Mobile-Based Intervention for Comorbid, Recurrent Depression in Patients With Chronic Back Pain on Sick Leave (Get.Back): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial on Feasibility, User Satisfaction, and Effectiveness, 2020, JMIR Mental Health
  • Effectiveness and Moderators of an Internet-Based Mobile-Supported Stress Management Intervention as a Universal Prevention Approach: Randomized Controlled Trial, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research

Berking has collaborated repeatedly with several coauthors, reflecting extended research partnerships. Frequent coauthors include:

  • David Daniel Ebert
  • Harald Baumeister
  • Kiona K. Weisel
  • Lena Schindler-Gmelch
  • Anna-Carlotta Zarski

Best Publications

  • A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments.

    Pim Cuijpers;Matthias Berking;Gerhard Andersson;Leanne Quigley

  • Emotion regulation and mental health: recent findings, current challenges, and future directions.

    Matthias Berking;Peggilee Wupperman

  • Emotion-regulation skills as a treatment target in psychotherapy

    Matthias Berking;Peggilee Wupperman;Alexander Reichardt;Tanja Pejic

  • Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Marit Sijbrandij;Sander Koole;Marcus Huibers

  • Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Youth: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Outcome Trials

    David Daniel Ebert;Anna-Carlotta Zarski;Helen Christensen;Yvonne Stikkelbroek

  • Deficits in emotion-regulation skills predict alcohol use during and after cognitive-behavioral therapy for alcohol dependence.

    Matthias Berking;Matthias Margraf;David Ebert;Peggilee Wupperman

  • Self-compassion as an emotion regulation strategy in major depressive disorder.

    Alice Diedrich;Michaela Grant;Stefan G. Hofmann;Wolfgang Hiller

  • Internet interventions for mental health in university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Mathias Harrer;Sophia H. Adam;Harald Baumeister;Pim Cuijpers

  • Standalone smartphone apps for mental health—a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Kiona K. Weisel;Lukas M. Fuhrmann;Matthias Berking;Harald Baumeister

  • The benefit of web- and computer-based interventions for stress : A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Elena Heber;David Daniel Ebert;Dirk Lehr;Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers

  • Emotion regulation predicts symptoms of depression over five years.

    Matthias Berking;Matthias Berking;Carolin M. Wirtz;Carolin M. Wirtz;Jennifer Svaldi;Stefan G. Hofmann

  • Self-Conscious Emotions and Depression: Rumination Explains Why Shame But Not Guilt is Maladaptive

    Ulrich Orth;Matthias Berking;Simone Burkhardt

  • Emotion Regulation Skills Training Enhances the Efficacy of Inpatient Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Matthias Berking;David Ebert;Pim Cuijpers;Stefan G Hofmann

  • Affect Regulation Training

    Matthias Berking;Brian Whitley

  • Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;David Daniel Ebert;Liesje Donkin;Heleen Riper

  • Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Care for Adults in Treatment for Depression and Anxiety : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Anne Etzelmueller;Christiaan Vis;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Harald Baumeister

  • Does cognitive behaviour therapy have an enduring effect that is superior to keeping patients on continuation pharmacotherapy? A meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Steven D Hollon;Annemieke van Straten;Claudi Bockting

  • Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur standardisierten Selbsteinschätzung emotionaler Kompetenzen (SEK-27)

    Matthias Berking;Hansjörg Znoj

  • Treatment of comorbid alcohol use disorders and depression with cognitive-behavioural therapy and motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis

    Heleen Riper;Heleen Riper;Gerhard Andersson;Sarah B. Hunter;Jessica de Wit

  • Increasing the acceptance of internet-based mental health interventions in primary care patients with depressive symptoms. A randomized controlled trial

    D.D. Ebert;D.D. Ebert;D.D. Ebert;M. Berking;P. Cuijpers;D. Lehr

  • Enhancing emotion-regulation skills in police officers: Results of a pilot controlled study.

    Matthias Berking;Caroline Meier;Peggilee Wupperman

  • DSM-IV und DSM-5: Was hat sich tatsächlich verändert?

    Anna M. Ehret;Matthias Berking

Frequent Co-Authors

David Daniel Ebert
David Daniel Ebert Technical University of Munich
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dirk Lehr
Dirk Lehr Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Harald Baumeister
Harald Baumeister University of Ulm
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Filip Smit
Filip Smit Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Winfried Rief
Winfried Rief Philipp University of Marburg
Stefan G. Hofmann
Stefan G. Hofmann Philipp University of Marburg
Randy P. Auerbach
Randy P. Auerbach Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens the door to diverse career opportunities. Many students aim to become mental health professionals, as demand for qualified counselors is growing nationwide. Online programs provide the flexibility to balance studies with work or family commitments while building essential skills.

Each state and city may have different requirements for licensure and practice. If you want to become a mental health counselor in Irvine or learn about how to become a mental health counselor in Irving, it's important to review local regulations. Similarly, pathways can look different if you plan to become a mental health counselor in Jacksonville or want to find out how to become a mental health counselor in Jersey City.

Whether you are interested in clinical practice, research, or community outreach, online psychology degrees can help launch or advance your career. Assess local requirements, accredited programs, and specific career pathways to make an informed decision about your educational journey.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Berking

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles