World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Margaret Mitchell

Margaret Mitchell

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
23663
World Ranking
5741
National Ranking
2610

Margaret Mitchell publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 89 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Margaret Mitchell D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Margaret Mitchell is affiliated with Hugging Face in the United States, contributing to research primarily within the domain of computer science. Their scholarly output spans 30 publications in this field, with a focus on several specialized subfields and topics.

The main subfields of study include artificial intelligence, safety research, computer vision and pattern recognition, information systems, and general health professions. The scientist's work commonly addresses themes such as topic modeling, ethics and social impacts of AI, natural language processing techniques, machine learning and data classification, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), face recognition and analysis, and medical malpractice and liability issues.

Margaret Mitchell has authored or contributed to multiple research papers, including:

  • Helping Cancer Patients to Choose the Best Treatment: Towards Automated Data-Driven and Personalized Information Presentation of Cancer Treatment Options, 2024, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Saving Face, 2020, Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
  • Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The BigScience ROOTS Corpus: A 1.6TB Composite Multilingual Dataset, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

Their frequent co-authors include Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Yacine Jernite, Jesse Dodge, Giada Pistilli, and Christopher Akiki. This network of collaborators reflects an active engagement with various researchers in the computational and AI research communities.

Margaret Mitchell's work has been published predominantly in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), the Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl), the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, and the Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Among these venues, the largest number of publications have appeared on arXiv.

Best Publications

  • VQA: Visual Question Answering

    Stanislaw Antol;Aishwarya Agrawal;Jiasen Lu;Margaret Mitchell

  • Model Cards for Model Reporting

    Margaret Mitchell;Simone Wu;Andrew Zaldivar;Parker Barnes

  • VQA: Visual Question Answering

    Aishwarya Agrawal;Jiasen Lu;Stanislaw Antol;Margaret Mitchell

  • From captions to visual concepts and back

    Hao Fang;Saurabh Gupta;Forrest Iandola;Rupesh K. Srivastava

  • BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model

    Unknown

  • Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learning

    Brian Hu Zhang;Blake Lemoine;Margaret Mitchell

  • A Neural Network Approach to Context-Sensitive Generation of Conversational Responses

    Alessandro Sordoni;Michel Galley;Michael Auli;Chris Brockett

  • Closing the AI accountability gap: defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing

    Inioluwa Deborah Raji;Andrew Smart;Rebecca N. White;Margaret Mitchell

  • Midge: Generating Image Descriptions From Computer Vision Detections

    Margaret Mitchell;Jesse Dodge;Amit Goyal;Kota Yamaguchi

  • VQA: Visual Question Answering

    Aishwarya Agrawal;Jiasen Lu;Stanislaw Antol;Margaret Mitchell

  • Spoken Language Derived Measures for Detecting Mild Cognitive Impairment

    B. Roark;M. Mitchell;J. Hosom;K. Hollingshead

  • Visual Storytelling

    Ting-Hao Kenneth Huang;Francis Ferraro;Nasrin Mostafazadeh;Ishan Misra

  • 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning

    Ben Hutchinson;Margaret Mitchell

  • Generating Natural Questions About an Image

    Nasrin Mostafazadeh;Ishan Misra;Jacob Devlin;Margaret Mitchell

  • CLPsych 2015 Shared Task: Depression and PTSD on Twitter

    Glen Coppersmith;Mark Dredze;Craig Harman;Kristy Hollingshead

  • Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditing

    Inioluwa Deborah Raji;Timnit Gebru;Margaret Mitchell;Joy Buolamwini

  • Language Models for Image Captioning: The Quirks and What Works

    Jacob Devlin;Hao Cheng;Hao Fang;Saurabh Gupta

  • Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructure

    Ben Hutchinson;Andrew Smart;Alex Hanna;Emily Denton

  • Exploring Nearest Neighbor Approaches for Image Captioning

    Jacob Devlin;Saurabh Gupta;Ross B. Girshick;Margaret Mitchell

  • Seeing through the Human Reporting Bias: Visual Classifiers from Noisy Human-Centric Labels

    Ishan Misra;C. Lawrence Zitnick;Margaret Mitchell;Ross Girshick

  • Open Domain Targeted Sentiment

    Margaret Mitchell;Jacqui Aguilar;Theresa Wilson;Benjamin Van Durme

  • Visual Storytelling

    Ting-Hao;Huang;Francis Ferraro;Nasrin Mostafazadeh

Frequent Co-Authors

C. Lawrence Zitnick
C. Lawrence Zitnick Facebook (United States)
Michel Galley
Michel Galley Microsoft (United States)
Jianfeng Gao
Jianfeng Gao Microsoft (United States)
Xiaodong He
Xiaodong He Chinese Academy of Sciences
Devi Parikh
Devi Parikh Facebook (United States)
Ishan Misra
Ishan Misra Facebook (United States)
Dhruv Batra
Dhruv Batra Georgia Institute of Technology
Ehud Reiter
Ehud Reiter University of Aberdeen
Chris Brockett
Chris Brockett Microsoft (United States)
Michael Auli
Michael Auli Facebook (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a range of related online degrees and career pathways. For example, a bachelor of science in physics online provides a solid foundation in analytical problem-solving, which is highly valued in the tech industry.

Data-driven roles are in high demand. With the growing need for data specialists, you might consider data science degrees that emphasize skills in analytics, machine learning, and statistics—ideal for careers in business intelligence and research.

Another attractive choice is electrical engineering. The online electrical engineering career outcomes highlight opportunities in automation, hardware development, and telecommunications, blending software expertise with engineering principles.

Finally, those seeking quick entry into the workforce may benefit from short certificate programs that pay well. These certifications can lead to lucrative tech-adjacent roles such as IT support, cloud computing, or cybersecurity, without the longer commitment of a full degree.

Best Scientists Citing Margaret Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles