World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 105 291 282 159 154 301 39757

Yejin Choi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Yejin Choi between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Yejin Choi published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 20.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 81 publications in 2024. 115 of the 489 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 81. Peak 81 publications in 2024. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 79 publications 2022: 55 publications 2023: 75 publications 2024: 81 publications 2025: 34 publications
2002 2025

489 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Yejin Choi: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 2
2004 0
2005 3
2006 1
2007 4
2008 1
2009 1
2010 5
2011 9
2012 6
2013 10
2014 4
2015 10
2016 11
2017 14
2018 18
2019 31
2020 34
2021 79
2022 55
2023 75
2024 81
2025 34
Total 489
Download as CSV

Yejin Choi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yejin Choi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 292–301 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 301 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293 301
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Yejin Choi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yejin Choi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37 105
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Yejin Choi is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, particularly focusing on artificial intelligence and related subfields. Their research encompasses topics such as topic modeling, natural language processing techniques, multimodal machine learning applications, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), speech and dialogue systems, text readability and simplification, and hate speech and cyberbullying detection.

The scientist has published a significant number of papers, with notable recent works including:

  • CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning (2021), Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at Scale (2020), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • WinoGrande (2021), Communications of the ACM
  • Distributional Footprints of Deceptive Product Reviews (2021), Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoning (2022), Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Yejin Choi frequently collaborates with other researchers. Common coauthors include:

  • Ronan Le Bras
  • Ximing Lu
  • Chandra Bhagavatula
  • Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  • Liwei Jiang

Their work appears primarily in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

The main fields of study in their research encompass computer science with a strong emphasis on artificial intelligence. Subfields include artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, information systems, sociology and political science, and safety research.

Best Publications

  • The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration

    Ari Holtzman;Jan Buys;Leo Du;Maxwell Forbes

  • Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Tasks

    Xiujun Li;Xi Yin;Chunyuan Li;Pengchuan Zhang

  • BabyTalk: Understanding and Generating Simple Image Descriptions

    Girish Kulkarni;Visruth Premraj;Vicente Ordonez;Sagnik Dhar

  • Finding Deceptive Opinion Spam by Any Stretch of the Imagination

    Myle Ott;Yejin Choi;Claire Cardie;Jeffrey T. Hancock

  • Neural Motifs: Scene Graph Parsing with Global Context

    Rowan Zellers;Mark Yatskar;Sam Thomson;Yejin Choi

  • Truth of Varying Shades: Analyzing Language in Fake News and Political Fact-Checking

    Hannah Rashkin;Eunsol Choi;Jin Yea Jang;Svitlana Volkova

  • VinVL: Revisiting Visual Representations in Vision-Language Models

    Pengchuan Zhang;Xiujun Li;Xiaowei Hu;Jianwei Yang

  • COMET: Commonsense Transformers for Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction

    Antoine Bosselut;Hannah Rashkin;Maarten Sap;Chaitanya Malaviya

  • CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning

    Jack Hessel;Ari Holtzman;Maxwell Forbes;Ronan Le Bras

  • SWAG: A Large-Scale Adversarial Dataset for Grounded Commonsense Inference

    Rowan Zellers;Yonatan Bisk;Roy Schwartz;Yejin Choi

  • QuAC: Question Answering in Context

    Eunsol Choi;He He;Mohit Iyyer;Mohit Iyyer;Mark Yatskar

  • WinoGrande: an adversarial winograd schema challenge at scale

    Keisuke Sakaguchi;Ronan Le Bras;Chandra Bhagavatula;Yejin Choi

  • From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoning

    Rowan Zellers;Yonatan Bisk;Ali Farhadi;Yejin Choi

  • The Risk of Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detection.

    Maarten Sap;Dallas Card;Saadia Gabriel;Yejin Choi

  • OpinionFinder: A System for Subjectivity Analysis

    Theresa Wilson;Paul Hoffmann;Swapna Somasundaran;Jason Kessler

  • ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning

    Maarten Sap;Ronan Le Bras;Emily Allaway;Chandra Bhagavatula

  • Baby talk: Understanding and generating simple image descriptions

    Girish Kulkarni;Visruth Premraj;Sagnik Dhar;Siming Li

  • HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?

    Rowan Zellers;Ari Holtzman;Yonatan Bisk;Ali Farhadi

  • Syntactic Stylometry for Deception Detection

    Song Feng;Ritwik Banerjee;Yejin Choi

  • Identifying Sources of Opinions with Conditional Random Fields and Extraction Patterns

    Yejin Choi;Claire Cardie;Ellen Riloff;Siddharth Patwardhan

  • PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language

    Yonatan Bisk;Rowan Zellers;Ronan Le bras;Jianfeng Gao

  • Defending Against Neural Fake News

    Rowan Zellers;Ari Holtzman;Hannah Rashkin;Yonatan Bisk

Frequent Co-Authors

Maarten Sap
Maarten Sap Carnegie Mellon University
Noah A. Smith
Noah A. Smith University of Washington
Jianfeng Gao
Jianfeng Gao Microsoft (United States)
Claire Cardie
Claire Cardie Cornell University
Asli Celikyilmaz
Asli Celikyilmaz Facebook (United States)
Ali Farhadi
Ali Farhadi University of Washington
Luke Zettlemoyer
Luke Zettlemoyer University of Washington
Tamara L. Berg
Tamara L. Berg University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Hannaneh Hajishirzi
Hannaneh Hajishirzi University of Washington
Alexander C. Berg
Alexander C. Berg University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA offers a variety of flexible options for every learner. Many students are now turning to cheap online college classes to save money without sacrificing quality. These programs allow you to balance work, life, and education, making them ideal for non-traditional students or busy professionals.

If your academic record isn’t perfect, don’t worry—many best colleges for low gpa now offer accessible pathways for motivated students ready to upskill. Online learning has opened doors for those who may not meet traditional admission standards yet are eager to build a rewarding technical career.

Accelerated tracks, such as those found in computer science accelerated program s, allow students to earn their degree faster and enter the workforce sooner. Graduates can explore a wide range of roles—from software development to IT project management, or even branches outside technology. For instance, you might wonder what can you do with an environmental science major? Like computer science, environmental science offers diverse, emerging career options across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Yejin Choi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles