World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
8615
World Ranking
7181
National Ranking
3141

Asli Celikyilmaz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Asli Celikyilmaz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 177 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Asli Celikyilmaz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Asli Celikyilmaz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Asli Celikyilmaz is affiliated with Facebook in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in computer science, particularly focusing on artificial intelligence. Their body of work includes 159 publications primarily centered on artificial intelligence, with additional work in computer vision and pattern recognition, management science and operations research, general health professions, and software.

Their research covers a range of core topics such as topic modeling, natural language processing techniques, multimodal machine learning applications, text readability and simplification, advanced text analysis techniques, speech and dialogue systems, and domain adaptation and few-shot learning.

The scientist has authored numerous papers published mainly in arXiv (Cornell University), with 61 publications in this venue alone. Other publications appear in venues like the Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, and IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

Recent significant papers include:

  • Evaluation of Text Generation: A Survey, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Augmented Language Models: a Survey, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • OPT-IML: Scaling Language Model Instruction Meta Learning through the Lens of Generalization, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • A Review on Language Models as Knowledge Bases, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • PlotMachines: Outline-Conditioned Generation with Dynamic Plot State Tracking, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field. Regular co-authors include Ramakanth Pasunuru, Jianfeng Gao, Tianlu Wang, Paul Smolensky, and Mohit Bansal, reflecting ongoing partnerships in advancing research within artificial intelligence and natural language processing.

Best Publications

  • COMET: Commonsense Transformers for Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction

    Antoine Bosselut;Hannah Rashkin;Maarten Sap;Chaitanya Malaviya

  • Reinforced Cross-Modal Matching and Self-Supervised Imitation Learning for Vision-Language Navigation

    Xin Wang;Qiuyuan Huang;Asli Celikyilmaz;Jianfeng Gao

  • Multi-Domain Joint Semantic Frame Parsing Using Bi-Directional RNN-LSTM.

    Dilek Hakkani-Tür;Gokhan Tur;Asli Celikyilmaz;Yun-Nung Chen

  • Cyclical Annealing Schedule: A Simple Approach to Mitigating KL Vanishing

    Hao Fu;Chunyuan Li;Xiaodong Liu;Jianfeng Gao

  • Deep Communicating Agents for Abstractive Summarization

    Asli Celikyilmaz;Antoine Bosselut;Xiaodong He;Yejin Choi

  • End-to-End Task-Completion Neural Dialogue Systems

    Xiujun Li;Yun-Nung Chen;Lihong Li;Jianfeng Gao

  • Augmented Language Models: a Survey

    Unknown

  • Modeling Uncertainty with Fuzzy Logic

    Asli Celikyilmaz;I. Burhan Türksen

  • OPT-IML: Scaling Language Model Instruction Meta Learning through the Lens of Generalization

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of Text Generation: A Survey

    Asli Celikyilmaz;Elizabeth Clark;Jianfeng Gao

  • A Hybrid Hierarchical Model for Multi-Document Summarization

    Asli Celikyilmaz;Dilek Hakkani-Tur

  • Composite Task-Completion Dialogue Policy Learning via Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning

    Baolin Peng;Xiujun Li;Lihong Li;Jianfeng Gao

  • QMSum: A New Benchmark for Query-based Multi-domain Meeting Summarization

    Ming Zhong;Da Yin;Tao Yu;Ahmad Zaidi

  • Enhanced Fuzzy System Models With Improved Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm

    A. Celikyilmaz;I. Burhan Turksen

  • PlotMachines: Outline-Conditioned Generation with Dynamic Plot State Tracking

    Hannah Rashkin;Asli Celikyilmaz;Yejin Choi;Jianfeng Gao

  • Sentence Mover’s Similarity: Automatic Evaluation for Multi-Sentence Texts

    Elizabeth Clark;Asli Celikyilmaz;Noah A. Smith

  • A Review on Language Models as Knowledge Bases

    Unknown

  • Eye Gaze for Spoken Language Understanding in Multi-modal Conversational Interactions

    Dilek Hakkani-Tür;Malcolm Slaney;Asli Celikyilmaz;Larry Heck

  • Intent detection using semantically enriched word embeddings

    Joo-Kyung Kim;Gokhan Tur;Asli Celikyilmaz;Bin Cao

  • Probabilistic model-based sentiment analysis of twitter messages

    Asli Celikyilmaz;Dilek Hakkani-Tur;Junlan Feng

  • Discovery of Topically Coherent Sentences for Extractive Summarization

    Asli Celikyilmaz;Dilek Hakkani-Tur

  • Fuzzy functions with support vector machines

    Aslı Çelikyılmaz;I. Burhan Türkşen

  • Robust Navigation with Language Pretraining and Stochastic Sampling

    Xiujun Li;Chunyuan Li;Qiaolin Xia;Yonatan Bisk

Frequent Co-Authors

Dilek Hakkani-Tur
Dilek Hakkani-Tur University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jianfeng Gao
Jianfeng Gao Microsoft (United States)
Gokhan Tur
Gokhan Tur Amazon (United States)
Yejin Choi
Yejin Choi Stanford University
Ruhi Sarikaya
Ruhi Sarikaya Amazon (United States)
Yun-Nung Chen
Yun-Nung Chen National Taiwan University
Li Deng
Li Deng Citadel
Mohit Bansal
Mohit Bansal University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Lawrence Carin
Lawrence Carin Duke University
Paul Smolensky
Paul Smolensky Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science doesn’t stop at traditional degrees. More students are now considering short careers that pay well. These quick programs can launch you into tech roles faster while still offering strong salary potential.

For those interested in emerging fields, pursuing an ai degree online is a popular pathway. AI skills are in high demand, making these flexible online options especially attractive for working professionals and career switchers.

Choosing the right academic path is crucial. Reviewing the majors that align with your goals can help you plan for a successful tech career. From computer science to data analytics, the right major can open doors in the industry.

If you are looking for advanced credentials without a lengthy commitment, consider the easiest online masters programs. These degrees can enhance your qualifications and broaden your career options, all while fitting your schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Asli Celikyilmaz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles