World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
81
Citations
23670
World Ranking
1035
National Ranking
149

Xiaodan Liang publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiaodan Liang sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 264 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Xiaodan Liang D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiaodan Liang sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Xiaodan Liang is affiliated with Sun Yat-sen University in China and has an extensive publication record in the field of Computer Science. Their research focuses primarily on computer vision and pattern recognition, as well as artificial intelligence. Liang's contributions span multiple subfields, including control and systems engineering, computational mechanics, and aerospace engineering.

The scientist's work covers a wide range of topics, with particular emphasis on multimodal machine learning applications, domain adaptation and few-shot learning, topic modeling, advanced neural network applications, natural language processing techniques, advanced image and video retrieval techniques, and human pose and action recognition.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Xiaodan Liang include Liang Lin, Xiaojun Chang, Hang Xu, and Jianhua Han. These partnerships reflect consistent teamwork on many research projects.

The scientist has published extensively in several venues, frequently contributing to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Recent published papers by Xiaodan Liang include:

  • FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Training, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Pyramid R-CNN: Towards Better Performance and Adaptability for 3D Object Detection, 2021, 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
  • One Million Scenes for Autonomous Driving: ONCE Dataset, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Knowledge Distillation via the Target-aware Transformer, 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • Exploring Inter-Channel Correlation for Diversity-preserved Knowledge Distillation, 2021, 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Overall, Xiaodan Liang's research activity is notable for its breadth across topics in machine learning and computer vision, with a consistent presence in leading academic conferences and repositories. Their collaborations and publication venues indicate active engagement within the scientific community specializing in artificial intelligence and related areas.

Best Publications

  • Is Faster R-CNN Doing Well for Pedestrian Detection?

    Liliang Zhang;Liang Lin;Xiaodan Liang;Kaiming He

  • Object Region Mining with Adversarial Erasing: A Simple Classification to Semantic Segmentation Approach

    Yunchao Wei;Jiashi Feng;Xiaodan Liang;Ming-Ming Cheng

  • Perceptual Generative Adversarial Networks for Small Object Detection

    Jianan Li;Xiaodan Liang;Yunchao Wei;Tingfa Xu

  • Toward controlled generation of text

    Zhiting Hu;Zichao Yang;Xiaodan Liang;Ruslan Salakhutdinov

  • Scale-Aware Fast R-CNN for Pedestrian Detection

    Jianan Li;Xiaodan Liang;Shengmei Shen;Tingfa Xu

  • STC: A Simple to Complex Framework for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation

    Yunchao Wei;Xiaodan Liang;Yunpeng Chen;Xiaohui Shen

  • Meta R-CNN: Towards General Solver for Instance-Level Low-Shot Learning

    Xiaopeng Yan;Ziliang Chen;Anni Xu;Xiaoxi Wang

  • Look into Person: Self-Supervised Structure-Sensitive Learning and a New Benchmark for Human Parsing

    Ke Gong;Xiaodan Liang;Dongyu Zhang;Xiaohui Shen

  • Semantic Object Parsing with Graph LSTM

    Xiaodan Liang;Xiaohui Shen;Jiashi Feng;Liang Lin

  • Toward Characteristic-Preserving Image-Based Virtual Try-On Network

    Bochao Wang;Huabin Zheng;Xiaodan Liang;Yimin Chen

  • Dual Motion GAN for Future-Flow Embedded Video Prediction

    Xiaodan Liang;Lisa Lee;Wei Dai;Eric P. Xing

  • Look into Person: Joint Body Parsing & Pose Estimation Network and a New Benchmark

    Xiaodan Liang;Ke Gong;Xiaohui Shen;Liang Lin

  • Instance-Level Human Parsing via Part Grouping Network.

    Ke Gong;Xiaodan Liang;Yicheng Li;Yimin Chen

  • Rethinking Knowledge Graph Propagation for Zero-Shot Learning

    Michael Kampffmeyer;Yinbo Chen;Xiaodan Liang;Hao Wang

  • Peak-Piloted Deep Network for Facial Expression Recognition

    Xiangyun Zhao;Xiaodan Liang;Luoqi Liu;Teng Li

  • Human Parsing with Contextualized Convolutional Neural Network

    Xiaodan Liang;Chunyan Xu;Xiaohui Shen;Jianchao Yang

  • Deep Human Parsing with Active Template Regression

    Xiaodan Liang;Si Liu;Xiaohui Shen;Jianchao Yang

  • Knowledge-Driven Encode, Retrieve, Paraphrase for Medical Image Report Generation

    Christy Y. Li;Xiaodan Liang;Zhiting Hu;Eric P. Xing

  • Poseidon: an efficient communication architecture for distributed deep learning on GPU clusters

    Hao Zhang;Zeyu Zheng;Shizhen Xu;Wei Dai

  • Adversarial Geometry-Aware Human Motion Prediction

    Liang-Yan Gui;Yu-Xiong Wang;Xiaodan Liang;José M. F. Moura

  • Proposal-Free Network for Instance-Level Object Segmentation

    Xiaodan Liang;Liang Lin;Yunchao Wei;Xiaohui Shen

  • Hybrid Retrieval-Generation Reinforced Agent for Medical Image Report Generation

    Yuan Li;Xiaodan Liang;Zhiting Hu;Eric P. Xing

Frequent Co-Authors

Liang Lin
Liang Lin Sun Yat-sen University
Eric P. Xing
Eric P. Xing Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Shuicheng Yan
Shuicheng Yan National University of Singapore
Zhiting Hu
Zhiting Hu University of California, San Diego
Xiaohui Shen
Xiaohui Shen ByteDance
Jiashi Feng
Jiashi Feng ByteDance
Yunchao Wei
Yunchao Wei Beijing Jiaotong University
Zhenguo Li
Zhenguo Li Huawei Technologies (China)
Hao Zhang
Hao Zhang Simon Fraser University
Jianchao Yang
Jianchao Yang ByteDance

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open flexible and affordable pathways to a Computer Science career. For those seeking a quick transition into advanced roles, quickest masters degree online programs allow motivated students to earn their credentials in less time than traditional options.

If you want a strong return on your educational investment, consider graduate degrees in areas like Computer Science, Data Science, or Cybersecurity. These are among the graduate degrees that are worth it due to their high demand and earning potential.

For those starting their academic journey or looking to upskill quickly, 2 year online degrees offer a fast, flexible entry into tech careers or a stepping stone to further study.

Worried about costs? Many most affordable online colleges deliver high-quality Computer Science programs that fit diverse budgets, helping you reach your goals without overwhelming debt.

Best Scientists Citing Xiaodan Liang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles