What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Artificial intelligence
- Natural language processing
- Programming language
Her main research concerns Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing, Information retrieval, SemEval and Word-sense disambiguation.
Artificial intelligence is frequently linked to Subjectivity in her study.
Her study in Natural language processing is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Graph, Word and Computational model.
Her Information retrieval course of study focuses on Natural language and Text processing, Open text, PageRank and Semantic network.
Her SemEval study incorporates themes from Sentence and Construct.
Rada Mihalcea usually deals with Word-sense disambiguation and limits it to topics linked to Pattern recognition and Graph database and Computational linguistics.
Her most cited work include:
- TextRank: Bringing Order into Text (2683 citations)
- Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity (982 citations)
- Wikify!: linking documents to encyclopedic knowledge (881 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Her primary areas of study are Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing, Information retrieval, Word and Word-sense disambiguation.
Much of her study explores Artificial intelligence relationship to Context.
In most of her Context studies, her work intersects topics such as Utterance.
Her studies link Subjectivity with Natural language processing.
Her Information retrieval study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Annotation and World Wide Web.
Her Question answering study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as Information extraction.
She most often published in these fields:
- Artificial intelligence (61.92%)
- Natural language processing (54.40%)
- Information retrieval (19.95%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Artificial intelligence (61.92%)
- Natural language processing (54.40%)
- Human–computer interaction (4.66%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her main research concerns Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing, Human–computer interaction, Utterance and Context.
Her Artificial intelligence research includes elements of Variety, Graph and Style.
Her work in Natural language processing addresses issues such as Leverage, which are connected to fields such as Noun.
Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Distracted driving, User-generated content, Deception and Modalities.
Rada Mihalcea has included themes like Tone, Syllable, Expression and Face in her Utterance study.
Her research integrates issues of Crowdsourcing, Conversation, Dialog box and Perception in her study of Context.
Between 2018 and 2021, her most popular works were:
- DialogueRNN: An Attentive RNN for Emotion Detection in Conversations. (116 citations)
- MELD: A Multimodal Multi-Party Dataset for Emotion Recognition in Conversations (95 citations)
- Emotion Recognition in Conversation: Research Challenges, Datasets, and Recent Advances (53 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Artificial intelligence
- Programming language
- Natural language processing
Her scientific interests lie mostly in Natural language processing, Artificial intelligence, Conversation, Utterance and Context.
Her primary area of study in Natural language processing is in the field of Sentiment analysis.
Many of her research projects under Artificial intelligence are closely connected to Family history with Family history, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.
Her studies in Conversation integrate themes in fields like Emotion recognition, Field, Frustration, Key and Data science.
The concepts of her Utterance study are interwoven with issues in Code, Cognitive science and Benchmark.
Her Context study deals with Dialog box intersecting with Empirical research, Classifier, Word error rate and Identification.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
