World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
15307
World Ranking
7110
National Ranking
182

David R. Jordan publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Jordan sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 370 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David R. Jordan D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Jordan sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David R. Jordan is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields primarily within Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

The scientist's work includes detailed investigations in several subfields such as Molecular Medicine, Clinical Biochemistry, Pollution, Infectious Diseases, and Food Science. Their research topics cover a range of critical areas including:

  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Microbial infections and disease research
  • Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by David R. Jordan include:

  • Emergence of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli among Australian Chickens in the Absence of Fluoroquinolone Use (2020), published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology
  • Porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli: Antimicrobial resistance and development of microbial-based alternative control strategies (2021), published in Veterinary Microbiology
  • Influence of printing angulation on the surface roughness of additive manufactured clear silicone indices: An in vitro study (2020), published in Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
  • Genomic analysis of phylogenetic group B2 extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli causing infections in dogs in Australia (2020), published in Veterinary Microbiology
  • Implications of Foraging and Interspecies Interactions of Birds for Carriage of Escherichia coli Strains Resistant to Critically Important Antimicrobials (2020), published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology

David R. Jordan frequently collaborates with several researchers including Sam Abraham, Mark O'Dea, Rebecca Abraham, Terence Lee, and Tanya Laird.

Their research appears regularly in the following venues:

  • Veterinary Microbiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
  • Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
  • International Journal of Food Microbiology

Best Publications

  • Ecological dynamics of emerging bat virus spillover

    Raina K. Plowright;Raina K. Plowright;Peggy Eby;Peter J. Hudson;Ina L. Smith

  • Whole-genome sequencing reveals untapped genetic potential in Africa’s indigenous cereal crop sorghum

    Emma S. Mace;Shuaishuai Tai;Edward K. Gilding;Yanhong Li

  • Sorghum stay-green QTL individually reduce post-flowering drought-induced leaf senescence

    Karen Harris;PK Subudhi;Andrew Borrell;David Jordan

  • Drought adaptation of stay-green sorghum is associated with canopy development, leaf anatomy, root growth, and water uptake

    Andrew K. Borrell;John E. Mullet;Barbara George-Jaeggli;Erik J. van Oosterom

  • QTL for nodal root angle in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) co-locate with QTL for traits associated with drought adaptation.

    E.S. Mace;V. Singh;E.J. Van Oosterom;G.L. Hammer

  • Identification of genomic regions associated with stay green in sorghum by testing RILs in multiple environments

    Y. Z. Tao;R. G. Henzell;D. R. Jordan;D. G. Butler

  • Stay-green alleles individually enhance grain yield in sorghum under drought by modifying canopy development and water uptake patterns

    Andrew K. Borrell;Erik J. van Oosterom;John E. Mullet;Barbara George-Jaeggli

  • A consensus genetic map of sorghum that integrates multiple component maps and high-throughput Diversity Array Technology (DArT) markers

    Emma S Mace;Jean-Francois Rami;Sophie Bouchet;Patricia E Klein

  • QTL for root angle and number in a population developed from bread wheats (Triticum aestivum) with contrasting adaptation to water-limited environments

    Jack Christopher;Mandy Christopher;Raeleen Jennings;Shirley Jones

  • Exploring and Exploiting Pan-genomics for Crop Improvement.

    Yongfu Tao;Xianrong Zhao;Emma Mace;Emma Mace;Robert Henry

  • The Relationship Between the Stay-Green Trait and Grain Yield in Elite Sorghum Hybrids Grown in a Range of Environments

    D. R. Jordan;C. H. Hunt;A. W. Cruickshank;A. K. Borrell

  • DArT markers: diversity analyses and mapping in Sorghum bicolor

    Emma S Mace;Ling Xia;David R Jordan;Kirsten Halloran

  • Morphological and architectural development of root systems in sorghum and maize

    Vijaya Singh;Erik J. van Oosterom;David R. Jordan;Carlos D. Messina

  • Integrating sorghum whole genome sequence information with a compendium of sorghum QTL studies reveals uneven distribution of QTL and of gene-rich regions with significant implications for crop improvement.

    E. S. Mace;D. R. Jordan

  • Identification of QTL for sugar-related traits in a sweet × grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) recombinant inbred population

    Kimberley B. Ritter;Kimberley B. Ritter;Kimberley B. Ritter;David R. Jordan;Scott C. Chapman;Ian D. Godwin

  • A weakly supervised deep learning framework for sorghum head detection and counting

    Sambuddha Ghosal;Bangyou Zheng;Scott C. Chapman;Scott C. Chapman;Andries B. Potgieter

  • Multi-Spectral Imaging from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Enables the Assessment of Seasonal Leaf Area Dynamics of Sorghum Breeding Lines.

    Andries B. Potgieter;Barbara George-Jaeggli;Barbara George-Jaeggli;Scott C. Chapman;Scott C. Chapman;Kenneth Laws

  • An assessment of the genetic relationship between sweet and grain sorghums, within Sorghum bicolor ssp. bicolor (L.) Moench, using AFLP markers

    Kimberley B. Ritter;C. Lynne McIntyre;Ian D. Godwin;David R. Jordan

  • Crop design for specific adaptation in variable dryland production environments

    Graeme L. Hammer;Greg McLean;Scott Chapman;Bangyou Zheng

  • Whole-genome sequencing reveals untapped genetic potential in Africa’s indigenous cereal crop sorghum

    Emma S. Mace;Shauishuai Tai;Edward K. Gilding;Yanhong Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Emma S. Mace
Emma S. Mace University of Queensland
Graeme L. Hammer
Graeme L. Hammer University of Queensland
Ian D. Godwin
Ian D. Godwin University of Queensland
Andrew Borrell
Andrew Borrell University of Queensland
Scott C. Chapman
Scott C. Chapman University of Queensland
Darren J. Trott
Darren J. Trott University of Adelaide
Erik van Oosterom
Erik van Oosterom University of Queensland
Patricia E. Klein
Patricia E. Klein Texas A&M University
John E. Mullet
John E. Mullet Texas A&M University
Geoffrey W. Coombs
Geoffrey W. Coombs Fiona Stanley Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David R. Jordan

Trending Scientists