What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Genetics, Quantitative trait locus, Genetic variation, Microsatellite and Genetic marker.
His Genetics research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Nested association mapping and Genetic diversity.
His Quantitative trait locus research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Sorghum and Poaceae.
His research integrates issues of Genomics of domestication, DNA profiling, Domestication, Molecular biology and Locus in his study of Genetic variation.
His studies deal with areas such as DNA sequencing and Restriction fragment length polymorphism, Polymerase chain reaction, Primer as well as Genetic marker.
Stephen Kresovich interconnects Botany and Sweet sorghum in the investigation of issues within Gene.
His most cited work include:
- A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness (2611 citations)
- The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses (2200 citations)
- The Genetic Architecture of Maize Flowering Time (1062 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Genetics, Sorghum, Genetic marker, Botany and Genetic variation.
Genetics connects with themes related to Genetic diversity in his study.
His work carried out in the field of Sorghum brings together such families of science as Quantitative trait locus, Germplasm and Plant breeding.
His Quantitative trait locus research focuses on Genetic association and how it relates to Linkage disequilibrium.
His Genetic marker research integrates issues from Molecular marker, Genetic distance, Restriction fragment length polymorphism, Primer and Inbred strain.
His Genetic variation research incorporates themes from Genetic variability, Domestication, Biotechnology and Crop.
He most often published in these fields:
- Genetics (40.00%)
- Sorghum (36.36%)
- Genetic marker (22.42%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?
- Sorghum (36.36%)
- Quantitative trait locus (18.79%)
- Agronomy (19.39%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Stephen Kresovich focuses on Sorghum, Quantitative trait locus, Agronomy, Genetics and Botany.
His Sorghum study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Germplasm, Horticulture, Plant breeding and Genetic variation.
Stephen Kresovich has included themes like Linkage disequilibrium, Genetic association and Locus in his Quantitative trait locus study.
Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Reference genome and Allele are among the areas of Genetics where the researcher is concentrating his efforts.
His Botany research includes elements of Salicylic acid, Interleukin, Genome and Abiotic component.
His work deals with themes such as Genetic marker, Gene, Hybrid and Genomics, which intersect with Sweet sorghum.
Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Population genomic and genome-wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum (517 citations)
- Genome-environment associations in sorghum landraces predict adaptive traits. (139 citations)
- Genome-wide association study of grain polyphenol concentrations in global sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] germplasm. (75 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Stephen Kresovich mainly investigates Quantitative trait locus, Sorghum, Germplasm, Botany and Single-nucleotide polymorphism.
His Quantitative trait locus research includes themes of Allele, Locus, Agronomy and Genetic association.
His Sorghum research incorporates elements of Biotechnology, Association mapping, Grain quality and Candidate gene.
The Biotechnology study combines topics in areas such as Andropogoneae, Genetic variation, Computational genomics and Genetic diversity.
In his study, Sweet sorghum is inextricably linked to Genome, which falls within the broad field of Botany.
His study on Single-nucleotide polymorphism is covered under Genetics.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
