World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
38
Citations
7073
World Ranking
4310
National Ranking
284

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
4886
World Ranking
8027
National Ranking
629

Andrew Borrell publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Borrell sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 142 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Andrew Borrell D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Borrell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Does Maintaining Green Leaf Area in Sorghum Improve Yield under Drought? II. Dry Matter Production and Yield

    Andrew K. Borrell;Graeme L. Hammer;Robert G. Henzell

  • Sorghum stay-green QTL individually reduce post-flowering drought-induced leaf senescence

    Karen Harris;PK Subudhi;Andrew Borrell;David Jordan

  • Drought adaptation of stay-green sorghum is associated with canopy development, leaf anatomy, root growth, and water uptake

    Andrew K. Borrell;John E. Mullet;Barbara George-Jaeggli;Erik J. van Oosterom

  • Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought? I. Leaf growth and senescence

    Andrew K. Borrell;Graeme L. Hammer;Andrew C. L. Douglas

  • Improving efficiency of water use for irrigated rice in a semi-arid tropical environment.

    Andrew Borrell;Alan Garside;Shu Fukai

  • Stay-green: A consequence of the balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling?

    Andrew Borrell;Graeme Hammer;Erik Van Oosterom

  • Nitrogen Dynamics and the Physiological Basis of Stay-Green in Sorghum

    Andrew K. Borrell;Graeme L. Hammer

  • Stay-green alleles individually enhance grain yield in sorghum under drought by modifying canopy development and water uptake patterns

    Andrew K. Borrell;Erik J. van Oosterom;John E. Mullet;Barbara George-Jaeggli

  • QTL for root angle and number in a population developed from bread wheats (Triticum aestivum) with contrasting adaptation to water-limited environments

    Jack Christopher;Mandy Christopher;Raeleen Jennings;Shirley Jones

  • Developmental and physiological traits associated with high yield and stay-green phenotype in wheat

    J. T. Christopher;A. M. Manschadi;G. L. Hammer;A. K. Borrell

  • The Relationship Between the Stay-Green Trait and Grain Yield in Elite Sorghum Hybrids Grown in a Range of Environments

    D. R. Jordan;C. H. Hunt;A. W. Cruickshank;A. K. Borrell

  • Stay-green traits to improve wheat adaptation in well-watered and water-limited environments

    John T. Christopher;Mandy J. Christopher;Andrew K. Borrell;Susan Fletcher

  • VERNALIZATION1 Modulates Root System Architecture in Wheat and Barley.

    Kai P. Voss-Fels;Hannah Robinson;Stephen R. Mudge;Cecile Richard

  • Genomic Regions Influencing Seminal Root Traits in Barley

    Hannah Robinson;Lee Hickey;Cecile Richard;Emma Mace

  • Post-head-emergence frost in wheat and barley: defining the problem, assessing the damage, and identifying resistance

    T. M. Frederiks;J. T. Christopher;M. W. Sutherland;A. K. Borrell

  • Stay-green quantitative trait loci's effects on water extraction, transpiration efficiency and seed yield depend on recipient parent background

    Vincent Vadez;Santosh P. Deshpande;Jana Kholova;Graeme L. Hammer

  • Partitioning of Dry Matter and the Deposition and Use of Stem Reserves in a Semi-dwarf Wheat Crop

    Andrew K. Borrell;L. D. Incoll;Richard J. Simpson;Michael J. Dalling

  • Yield, transpiration efficiency, and water-use variations and their interrelationships in the sorghum reference collection

    V. Vadez;L. Krishnamurthy;C. T. Hash;H. D. Upadhyaya

  • Phenotyping novel stay-green traits to capture genetic variation in senescence dynamics

    John T. Christopher;Mathieu Veyradier;Andrew K. Borrell;Greg Harvey

  • Functional dynamics of the nitrogen balance of sorghum. II. Grain filling period.

    E.J. van Oosterom;S.C. Chapman;A.K. Borrell;I.J. Broad

  • Functional dynamics of the nitrogen balance of sorghum: I. N demand of vegetative plant parts

    E.J. van Oosterom;A.K. Borrell;S.C. Chapman;I.J. Broad

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. Jordan
David R. Jordan University of Queensland
Graeme L. Hammer
Graeme L. Hammer University of Queensland
Karine Chenu
Karine Chenu University of Queensland
Lee T. Hickey
Lee T. Hickey University of Queensland
Emma S. Mace
Emma S. Mace University of Queensland
Scott C. Chapman
Scott C. Chapman University of Queensland
John E. Mullet
John E. Mullet Texas A&M University
Erik van Oosterom
Erik van Oosterom University of Queensland
Patricia E. Klein
Patricia E. Klein Texas A&M University
James E. M. Watson
James E. M. Watson University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Borrell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles