World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roberto Tuberosa

Roberto Tuberosa

Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Italy
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 75 529 488 9 9 411 24568

Roberto Tuberosa publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roberto Tuberosa between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roberto Tuberosa published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 10.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2005. 20 of the 435 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2005. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 25 publications 2005: 46 publications 2006: 37 publications 2007: 37 publications 2008: 34 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 11 publications
1986 2025

435 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roberto Tuberosa: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 2
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 2
1994 4
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 3
2001 5
2002 9
2003 4
2004 25
2005 46
2006 37
2007 37
2008 34
2009 20
2010 26
2011 13
2012 9
2013 18
2014 17
2015 10
2016 8
2017 16
2018 12
2019 16
2020 10
2021 11
2022 5
2023 4
2024 9
2025 11
Total 435
Download as CSV

Roberto Tuberosa publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Tuberosa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 411–415 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 411 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11 411
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Roberto Tuberosa D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Tuberosa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28 75
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Italy Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Italy Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Botany

Roberto Tuberosa mainly investigates Quantitative trait locus, Genetics, Agronomy, Gene and Genomics. His Quantitative trait locus study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Biotechnology, Crop yield, Allele, Adaptation and Candidate gene. His work in Genetics covers topics such as Genetic diversity which are related to areas like Locus, Genotyping and Evolutionary biology.

Roberto Tuberosa has researched Agronomy in several fields, including Plant genetics and Ramification. Roberto Tuberosa has included themes like Chromosome regions and Selection in his Genomics study. His Genetic variation research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Genetic marker, Restriction fragment length polymorphism and Botany.

His most cited work include:

  • Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90 000 single nucleotide polymorphism array (995 citations)
  • Monitoring large-scale changes in transcript abundance in drought- and salt-stressed barley. (512 citations)
  • Root system architecture: opportunities and constraints for genetic improvement of crops. (468 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Quantitative trait locus, Agronomy, Genetics, Botany and Horticulture are his primary areas of study. His Quantitative trait locus research incorporates themes from Germplasm, Genomics, Association mapping, Allele and Candidate gene. His Genomics research focuses on subjects like Biotechnology, which are linked to Selection.

In general Agronomy study, his work on Drought tolerance, Grain yield, Cultivar and Phenology often relates to the realm of Yield, thereby connecting several areas of interest. The study of Genetics is intertwined with the study of Genetic diversity in a number of ways. His is involved in several facets of Botany study, as is seen by his studies on Poaceae and Hordeum vulgare.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Quantitative trait locus (32.11%)
  • Agronomy (30.03%)
  • Genetics (25.07%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Quantitative trait locus (32.11%)
  • Agronomy (30.03%)
  • Genetics (25.07%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Quantitative trait locus, Agronomy, Genetics, Genome-wide association study and Germplasm. His Quantitative trait locus research includes elements of Introgression, Association mapping, Allele, Family-based QTL mapping and Candidate gene. His work in Agronomy addresses issues such as Chromosome, which are connected to fields such as Major gene and Range.

His Genetics study typically links adjacent topics like Plant breeding. As a part of the same scientific study, he usually deals with the Plant breeding, concentrating on Genetic variation and frequently concerns with Adaptation and Botany. Within one scientific family, he focuses on topics pertaining to Selection under Germplasm, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Genotype.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication. (381 citations)
  • A high‐density, SNP‐based consensus map of tetraploid wheat as a bridge to integrate durum and bread wheat genomics and breeding (181 citations)
  • Durum wheat genome highlights past domestication signatures and future improvement targets (180 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Botany

His scientific interests lie mostly in Quantitative trait locus, Genetics, Agronomy, Single-nucleotide polymorphism and Crop. His research in Quantitative trait locus intersects with topics in Plant genetics, Allele, Family-based QTL mapping and Candidate gene. His Genetics study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Botany and Plant breeding.

His study explores the link between Plant breeding and topics such as Genetic variation that cross with problems in Selection and Gene pool. His work on Phenology as part of general Agronomy research is frequently linked to Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science. His Crop research integrates issues from Drought stress, Biotechnology and Genomics.

Best Publications

  • Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90 000 single nucleotide polymorphism array

    Shichen Wang;Debbie Wong;Kerrie Forrest;Alexandra Allen

  • Root system architecture: opportunities and constraints for genetic improvement of crops.

    Sophie de Dorlodot;Brian Forster;Loïc Pagès;Adam Price

  • Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication

    Raz Avni;Moran Nave;Omer Barad;Kobi Baruch

  • Durum wheat genome highlights past domestication signatures and future improvement targets

    Marco Maccaferri;Marco Maccaferri;Neil S. Harris;Sven O. Twardziok;Raj K. Pasam

  • Monitoring large-scale changes in transcript abundance in drought- and salt-stressed barley.

    Z. Neslihan Ozturk;Z. Neslihan Ozturk;Valentina Talamé;Valentina Talamé;Michael Deyholos;Christine B. Michalowski

  • Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops

    Roberto Tuberosa;Silvio Salvi

  • To clone or not to clone plant QTLs: present and future challenges

    Silvio Salvi;Roberto Tuberosa

  • Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?

    Nicholas C. Collins;François Tardieu;Roberto Tuberosa

  • Conserved noncoding genomic sequences associated with a flowering-time quantitative trait locus in maize

    Silvio Salvi;Giorgio Sponza;Michele Morgante;Dwight Tomes

  • Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era.

    Roberto Tuberosa

  • A high-density genetic map of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) from the cross Chinese Spring × SQ1 and its use to compare QTLs for grain yield across a range of environments

    S.A. Quarrie;A. Steed;C. Calestani;A. Semikhodskii

  • Mapping QTLs Regulating Morpho‐physiological Traits and Yield: Case Studies, Shortcomings and Perspectives in Drought‐stressed Maize

    Roberto Tuberosa;Silvio Salvi;Maria Corinna Sanguineti;Pierangelo Landi

  • Quantitative Trait Loci for Grain Yield and Adaptation of Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) Across a Wide Range of Water Availability

    Marco Maccaferri;Maria Corinna Sanguineti;Simona Corneti;José Luis Araus Ortega

  • Translational research impacting on crop productivity in drought-prone environments.

    Matthew Reynolds;Matthew Reynolds;Roberto Tuberosa

  • Identification of QTLs for root characteristics in maize grown in hydroponics and analysis of their overlap with QTLs for grain yield in the field at two water regimes.

    Roberto Tuberosa;Maria Corinna Sanguineti;Pierangelo Landi;Marcella Michela Giuliani

  • Application of genomics-assisted breeding for generation of climate resilient crops: Progress and prospects

    Chittaranjan Kole;Mehanathan Muthamilarasan;Robert Henry;David Edwards

  • Dissection and modelling of abiotic stress tolerance in plants.

    François Tardieu;Roberto Tuberosa

  • Can genomics boost productivity of orphan crops

    Rajeev Varshney;J.-M. Ribaut;E.S. Buckler;E.S. Buckler;R. Tuberosa

  • Population structure and long-range linkage disequilibrium in a durum wheat elite collection

    Marco Maccaferri;Maria Corinna Sanguineti;Enrico Noli;Roberto Tuberosa

  • A high‐density, SNP‐based consensus map of tetraploid wheat as a bridge to integrate durum and bread wheat genomics and breeding

    Marco Maccaferri;Andrea Ricci;Silvio Salvi;Sara Giulia Milner

  • Global agricultural intensification during climate change: a role for genomics.

    Michael Terence Abberton;Jacqueline Batley;Jacqueline Batley;Alison bentley;John Bryant

  • Genetic and genomic dissection of maize root development and architecture.

    Frank Hochholdinger;Roberto Tuberosa

  • Barley transcript profiles under dehydration shock and drought stress treatments : a comparative analysis

    Valentina Talamè;Neslihan Z. Ozturk;Hans J. Bohnert;Hans J. Bohnert;Roberto Tuberosa

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Maccaferri
Marco Maccaferri University of Bologna
Maria Corinna Sanguineti
Maria Corinna Sanguineti University of Bologna
Silvio Salvi
Silvio Salvi University of Bologna
M. M. Nachit
M. M. Nachit International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Morocco
Conxita Royo
Conxita Royo Institute for Research and Technology in Food and Agriculture
Rajeev K. Varshney
Rajeev K. Varshney Murdoch University
Karim Ammar
Karim Ammar International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
Dolors Villegas
Dolors Villegas Institute for Research and Technology in Food and Agriculture
L. F. García del Moral
L. F. García del Moral University of Granada
Catherine Feuillet
Catherine Feuillet Bayer (Germany)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Roberto Tuberosa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles