World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marco Maccaferri

Marco Maccaferri

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
47
Citations
11269
World Ranking
2485
National Ranking
87

Marco Maccaferri publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Maccaferri sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 209 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Marco Maccaferri D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Maccaferri sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90 000 single nucleotide polymorphism array

    Shichen Wang;Debbie Wong;Kerrie Forrest;Alexandra Allen

  • Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication

    Raz Avni;Moran Nave;Omer Barad;Kobi Baruch

  • Durum wheat genome highlights past domestication signatures and future improvement targets

    Marco Maccaferri;Marco Maccaferri;Neil S. Harris;Sven O. Twardziok;Raj K. Pasam

  • Mapping QTLs Regulating Morpho‐physiological Traits and Yield: Case Studies, Shortcomings and Perspectives in Drought‐stressed Maize

    Roberto Tuberosa;Silvio Salvi;Maria Corinna Sanguineti;Pierangelo Landi

  • Quantitative Trait Loci for Grain Yield and Adaptation of Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) Across a Wide Range of Water Availability

    Marco Maccaferri;Maria Corinna Sanguineti;Simona Corneti;José Luis Araus Ortega

  • Population structure and long-range linkage disequilibrium in a durum wheat elite collection

    Marco Maccaferri;Maria Corinna Sanguineti;Enrico Noli;Roberto Tuberosa

  • A Genome-Wide Association Study of Resistance to Stripe Rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) in a Worldwide Collection of Hexaploid Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

    Marco Maccaferri;Junli Zhang;Peter Bulli;Zewdie Abate

  • A high‐density, SNP‐based consensus map of tetraploid wheat as a bridge to integrate durum and bread wheat genomics and breeding

    Marco Maccaferri;Andrea Ricci;Silvio Salvi;Sara Giulia Milner

  • Resequencing of 145 Landmark Cultivars Reveals Asymmetric Sub-genome Selection and Strong Founder Genotype Effects on Wheat Breeding in China.

    Chenyang Hao;Chengzhi Jiao;Jian Hou;Tian Li

  • Association mapping in durum wheat grown across a broad range of water regimes

    Marco Maccaferri;Maria Corinna Sanguineti;Andrea Demontis;Ahmed El-Ahmed

  • Using vegetation indices derived from conventional digital cameras as selection criteria for wheat breeding in water-limited environments

    J. Casadesus;Y. Kaya;J. Bort;M. M. Nachit

  • Prioritizing quantitative trait loci for root system architecture in tetraploid wheat.

    Marco Maccaferri;Walid El-Feki;Walid El-Feki;Ghasemali Nazemi;Ghasemali Nazemi;Silvio Salvi

  • Genetic dissection of seminal root architecture in elite durum wheat germplasm

    Maria Corinna Sanguineti;S. Li;Marco Maccaferri;Simona Corneti

  • Searching for quantitative trait loci controlling root traits in maize: a critical appraisal

    Roberto Tuberosa;Silvio Salvi;Maria Corinna Sanguineti;Marco Maccaferri

  • Microsatellite analysis reveals a progressive widening of the genetic basis in the elite durum wheat germplasm

    M. Maccaferri;M. C. Sanguineti;P. Donini;R. Tuberosa

  • High-throughput SNP discovery and genotyping in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.)

    Daniele Trebbi;Marco Maccaferri;Peter de Heer;Anker Sørensen

  • Toward positional cloning of Vgt1, a QTL controlling the transition from the vegetative to the reproductive phase in maize.

    Silvio Salvi;Roberto Tuberosa;Elena Chiapparino;Marco Maccaferri

  • Comparative Aerial and Ground Based High Throughput Phenotyping for the Genetic Dissection of NDVI as a Proxy for Drought Adaptive Traits in Durum Wheat.

    Giuseppe E. Condorelli;Marco Maccaferri;Maria Newcomb;Pedro Andrade-Sanchez

  • Wheat root systems as a breeding target for climate resilience

    Eric S. Ober;Samir Alahmad;James Cockram;Cristian Forestan

  • Association mapping for root architectural traits in durum wheat seedlings as related to agronomic performance

    Maria Angela Canè;Marco Maccaferri;Ghasemali Nazemi;Silvio Salvi

  • Association mapping reveals novel stem rust resistance loci in durum wheat at the seedling stage

    Tesfaye Letta;Pablo Olivera;Marco Maccaferri;Yue Jin

  • QTL analysis of drought-related traits and grain yield in relation to genetic variation for leaf abscisic acid concentration in field-grown maize

    M.C. Sanguineti;R. Tuberosa;P. Landi;S. Salvi

  • An integrated DArT-SSR linkage map of durum wheat

    Paola Mantovani;Marco Maccaferri;Maria Corinna Sanguineti;Roberto Tuberosa

Frequent Co-Authors

Roberto Tuberosa
Roberto Tuberosa University of Bologna
Maria Corinna Sanguineti
Maria Corinna Sanguineti University of Bologna
Silvio Salvi
Silvio Salvi University of Bologna
Conxita Royo
Conxita Royo Institute for Research and Technology in Food and Agriculture
M. M. Nachit
M. M. Nachit International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Morocco
Dolors Villegas
Dolors Villegas Institute for Research and Technology in Food and Agriculture
Karim Ammar
Karim Ammar International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
L. F. García del Moral
L. F. García del Moral University of Granada
Catherine Feuillet
Catherine Feuillet Bayer (Germany)
Xianming Chen
Xianming Chen Washington State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Marco Maccaferri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles