World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
59
Citations
20344
World Ranking
1247
National Ranking
41

Pierre Martre publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Martre sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 161 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Pierre Martre D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Martre sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Agronomy

Agronomy, Anthesis, Poaceae, Crop yield and Cultivar are his primary areas of study. His Agronomy research incorporates elements of Genetic variability, Genetic variation and Food security. His work carried out in the field of Poaceae brings together such families of science as Fructification and Storage protein.

His studies deal with areas such as Global temperature, Consistency and Estimator as well as Crop yield. As part of the same scientific family, he usually focuses on Cultivar, concentrating on Senescence and intersecting with Quantitative trait locus, Doubled haploidy, Leaf lamina and Grain yield. He interconnects Global warming and Growing season in the investigation of issues within Yield.

His most cited work include:

  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production (801 citations)
  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production (801 citations)
  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change (749 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Agronomy, Simulation modeling, Crop, Anthesis and Crop yield. Pierre Martre focuses mostly in the field of Agronomy, narrowing it down to topics relating to Genetic variability and, in certain cases, Genetic variation. His study focuses on the intersection of Crop and fields such as Yield with connections in the field of Global warming.

His research integrates issues of Canopy and Poaceae in his study of Anthesis. Pierre Martre combines subjects such as Fructification and Quantitative trait locus with his study of Poaceae. His Crop yield study combines topics in areas such as Statistics, Phyllochron, Global change and Irrigation.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (69.28%)
  • Simulation modeling (31.33%)
  • Crop (24.70%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Crop (24.70%)
  • Agronomy (69.28%)
  • Crop simulation model (13.25%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Pierre Martre focuses on Crop, Agronomy, Crop simulation model, Sowing and Atmospheric sciences. He regularly links together related areas like Yield in his Crop studies. Pierre Martre is interested in Winter wheat, which is a field of Agronomy.

The various areas that he examines in his Sowing study include Genetic variability, Cultivar, Crop yield and Duration. His Cultivar research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Biomass, Global warming and Growing season. Pierre Martre connects Impact assessment with Simulation modeling in his research.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein (97 citations)
  • Diverging importance of drought stress for maize and winter wheat in Europe (76 citations)
  • Contribution of crop model structure, parameters and climate projections to uncertainty in climate change impact assessments. (63 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Agronomy

Pierre Martre spends much of his time researching Crop, Food security, Agronomy, Political science and Yield. His Crop research includes elements of Canopy, Drought stress and Winter wheat. His research in Food security intersects with topics in Wheat grain, Grain yield, Global change and Co2 concentration.

The Agronomy study combines topics in areas such as Genetic variability, Effects of global warming and Duration. Pierre Martre has included themes like Cropping and Probabilistic logic in his Yield study. Pierre Martre conducted interdisciplinary study in his works that combined Boreal and Simulation modeling.

Best Publications

  • Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates

    Chuang Zhao;Bing Liu;Shilong Piao;Xuhui Wang

  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;P. Martre;P. Martre;R. P. Rötter

  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;C. Rosenzweig;J. W. Jones

  • Raising yield potential of wheat. III. Optimizing partitioning to grain while maintaining lodging resistance

    M. John Foulkes;Gustavo A. Slafer;William J. Davies;Pete. M. Berry

  • Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods

    Bing Liu;Bing Liu;Senthold Asseng;Christoph Müller;Frank Ewert

  • Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one

    Pierre Martre;Pierre Martre;Daniel Wallach;Senthold Asseng;Frank Ewert

  • Climate change impacts on crop yields

    Unknown

  • Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein

    Senthold Asseng;Pierre Martre;Andrea Maiorano;Reimund P Rötter

  • Plasma Membrane Aquaporins Play a Significant Role during Recovery from Water Deficit

    Pierre Martre;Raphaël Morillon;François Barrieu;Gretchen B. North

  • Modeling Grain Nitrogen Accumulation and Protein Composition to Understand the Sink/Source Regulations of Nitrogen Remobilization for Wheat

    Pierre Martre;John R. Porter;Peter D. Jamieson;Eugène Triboï

  • Environmentally-induced changes in protein composition in developing grains of wheat are related to changes in total protein content.

    Eugène Triboï;Pierre Martre;Anne‐Marie Triboï‐Blondel

  • Identification of traits to improve the nitrogen-use efficiency of wheat genotypes

    O. Gaju;V. Allard;V. Allard;P. Martre;P. Martre;J.W. Snape

  • Diverging importance of drought stress for maize and winter wheat in Europe

    Heidi Webber;Frank Ewert;Jørgen E. Olesen;Christoph Müller

  • Deviation from the grain protein concentration–grain yield negative relationship is highly correlated to post-anthesis N uptake in winter wheat

    Matthieu Bogard;Vincent Allard;Vincent Allard;Maryse Brancourt-Hulmel;Emmanuel Heumez

  • Nitrogen partitioning and remobilization in relation to leaf senescence, grain yield and grain nitrogen concentration in wheat cultivars ☆

    Oorbessy Gaju;Vincent Allard;Vincent Allard;Pierre Martre;Pierre Martre;Jacques Le Gouis;Jacques Le Gouis

  • The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions.

    Enli Wang;Pierre Martre;Zhigan Zhao;Zhigan Zhao;Frank Ewert

  • Contribution of Crop Models to Adaptation in Wheat

    Karine Chenu;John Roy Porter;Pierre Martre;Bruno Basso

  • Anthesis date mainly explained correlations between post-anthesis leaf senescence, grain yield, and grain protein concentration in a winter wheat population segregating for flowering time QTLs

    Matthieu Bogard;Matthieu Jourdan;Matthieu Jourdan;Vincent Allard;Vincent Allard;Pierre Martre;Pierre Martre

  • Modelling protein content and composition in relation to crop nitrogen dynamics for wheat

    Pierre Martre;Peter D. Jamieson;Mikhail A. Semenov;Robert F. Zyskowski

  • Unravelling environmental and genetic relationships between grain yield and nitrogen concentration for wheat

    Eugène Triboi;Pierre Martre;Christine Girousse;Catherine Ravel

  • Contribution of crop model structure, parameters and climate projections to uncertainty in climate change impact assessments.

    Fulu Tao;Reimund P. Rötter;Taru Palosuo;Carlos Gregorio Hernández Díaz‐Ambrona

  • Sowing date and nitrogen fertilisation effects on dry matter and nitrogen dynamics for durum wheat: An experimental and simulation study

    Roberto Ferrise;Andrea Triossi;Pierre Stratonovitch;Marco Bindi

Frequent Co-Authors

Mikhail A. Semenov
Mikhail A. Semenov Rothamsted Research
Senthold Asseng
Senthold Asseng Technical University of Munich
Andrew J. Challinor
Andrew J. Challinor University of Leeds
Reimund P. Rötter
Reimund P. Rötter University of Göttingen
Frank Ewert
Frank Ewert University of Bonn
Christoph Müller
Christoph Müller Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Jørgen E. Olesen
Jørgen E. Olesen Aarhus University
Taru Palosuo
Taru Palosuo Natural Resources Institute Finland
Peter J. Thorburn
Peter J. Thorburn Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Davide Cammarano
Davide Cammarano Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Pierre Martre

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles