World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kurt Christian Kersebaum

Kurt Christian Kersebaum

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Czechia
2026
Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Czechia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 65 899 828 6 6 229 20783
Environmental Sciences 66 2050 1957 4 4 234 20909

Kurt Christian Kersebaum publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kurt Christian Kersebaum between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kurt Christian Kersebaum published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2017. 18 of the 261 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2017. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 5 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 7 publications
1984 2025

261 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kurt Christian Kersebaum: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 5
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 0
2001 4
2002 2
2003 2
2004 3
2005 9
2006 3
2007 6
2008 1
2009 7
2010 6
2011 6
2012 4
2013 9
2014 13
2015 18
2016 22
2017 25
2018 24
2019 15
2020 14
2021 10
2022 14
2023 13
2024 11
2025 7
Total 261
Download as CSV

Kurt Christian Kersebaum publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt Christian Kersebaum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 226–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 229 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58 229
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Kurt Christian Kersebaum D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt Christian Kersebaum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58 65
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2020 - Fellow of the Soil Science Society of America (SSSA)
  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Society of Agronomy (ASA)

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Agriculture
  • Ecology
  • Statistics

His primary areas of investigation include Agronomy, Climate change, Crop, Crop yield and Yield. His Agronomy research includes themes of Loam and Effects of global warming. His research in Climate change is mostly focused on Climate model.

His research investigates the connection with Crop and areas like Growing season which intersect with concerns in Phenology. His study in Crop yield is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Hydrology and Precipitation. His Yield study incorporates themes from Cropping, Agriculture, Global temperature and Atmospheric sciences.

His most cited work include:

  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production (801 citations)
  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change (749 citations)
  • Impacts and adaptation of European crop production systems to climate change (668 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Kurt Christian Kersebaum mostly deals with Agronomy, Climate change, Crop, Crop yield and Soil water. His Climate change research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Cropping, Agriculture, Atmospheric sciences and Yield. His Agriculture study incorporates themes from Global warming, Agricultural engineering and Global change.

His work carried out in the field of Crop brings together such families of science as Cultivar, Yield, Food security and Sowing. His research in Crop yield intersects with topics in Hydrology, Evapotranspiration, Agroforestry and Precision agriculture. The Soil water study combines topics in areas such as Fertilizer and Nitrogen cycle.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (41.53%)
  • Climate change (31.15%)
  • Crop (28.96%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Climate change (31.15%)
  • Agronomy (41.53%)
  • Crop (28.96%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Kurt Christian Kersebaum focuses on Climate change, Agronomy, Crop, Statistics and Agriculture. His Climate change research incorporates themes from Biomass, Mediterranean climate, Atmospheric sciences and Yield. His Crop research incorporates elements of Cultivar, Crop yield and Representative Concentration Pathways.

His Statistics research focuses on subjects like Phenology, which are linked to Experimental data. His Agriculture study combines topics in areas such as Global warming, Natural resource and Library science. His research in Crop simulation model focuses on subjects like Leaf area index, which are connected to Soil water.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein (97 citations)
  • Decline in climate resilience of European wheat. (67 citations)
  • Global wheat production with 1.5 and 2.0°C above pre-industrial warming (40 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agriculture
  • Statistics
  • Ecology

His primary areas of investigation include Climate change, Crop, Food security, Statistics and Agriculture. In the subject of general Climate change, his work in Global change is often linked to Baseline, thereby combining diverse domains of study. His Crop research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Water supply, Water use, Atmospheric sciences and Yield.

His work investigates the relationship between Statistics and topics such as Phenology that intersect with problems in Experimental data. His work on Water scarcity as part of general Agriculture research is frequently linked to Political science, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science. His research on Library science frequently links to adjacent areas such as Agronomy.

Best Publications

  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;P. Martre;P. Martre;R. P. Rötter

  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;C. Rosenzweig;J. W. Jones

  • Impacts and adaptation of European crop production systems to climate change

    J.E. Olesen;M. Trnka;K.C. Kersebaum;A.O. Skjelvåg

  • How Do Various Maize Crop Models Vary in Their Responses to Climate Change Factors

    Simona Bassu;Nadine Brisson;Jean Louis Durand;Kenneth Boote

  • Adverse weather conditions for European wheat production will become more frequent with climate change

    Miroslav Trnka;Miroslav Trnka;Reimund P. Rötter;Margarita Ruiz-Ramos;Kurt Christian Kersebaum

  • Simulation of winter wheat yield and its variability in different climates of Europe: A comparison of eight crop growth models

    Taru Palosuo;Kurt Christian Kersebaum;Carlos Angulo;Petr Hlavinka

  • Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods

    Bing Liu;Bing Liu;Senthold Asseng;Christoph Müller;Frank Ewert

  • Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one

    Pierre Martre;Pierre Martre;Daniel Wallach;Senthold Asseng;Frank Ewert

  • Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein

    Senthold Asseng;Pierre Martre;Andrea Maiorano;Reimund P Rötter

  • Agroclimatic conditions in Europe under climate change

    M. Trnka;Jørgen Eivind Olesen;K. C. Kersebaum;A. O. Skjelvåg

  • Estimating crop yield potential at regional to national scales

    Justin van Wart;K. Christian Kersebaum;Shaobing Peng;Maribeth Milner

  • Diverging importance of drought stress for maize and winter wheat in Europe

    Heidi Webber;Frank Ewert;Jørgen E. Olesen;Christoph Müller

  • Simulation of spring barley yield in different climatic zones of Northern and Central Europe: A comparison of nine crop models

    Reimund P. Rötter;Taru Palosuo;Kurt Christian Kersebaum;Carlos Angulo

  • Crop modelling for integrated assessment of risk to food production from climate change

    F. Ewert;R.P. Rötter;M. Bindi;H. Webber

  • The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions.

    Enli Wang;Pierre Martre;Zhigan Zhao;Zhigan Zhao;Frank Ewert

  • Validity of agroecosystem models a comparison of results of different models applied to the same data set

    B. Diekkrüger;D. Söndgerath;K.C. Kersebaum;C.W. McVoy

  • The MONICA model: Testing predictability for crop growth, soil moisture and nitrogen dynamics

    C. Nendel;M. Berg;K.C. Kersebaum;W. Mirschel

  • Decline in climate resilience of European wheat.

    Helena Kahiluoto;Janne Kaseva;Jan Balek;Jørgen E. Olesen

  • Contribution of crop model structure, parameters and climate projections to uncertainty in climate change impact assessments.

    Fulu Tao;Reimund P. Rötter;Taru Palosuo;Carlos Gregorio Hernández Díaz‐Ambrona

  • Cereal yield gaps across Europe

    René Schils;Jørgen E. Olesen;Kurt-Christian Kersebaum;Bert Rijk

  • Crop rotation modelling—A European model intercomparison

    Chris Kollas;Kurt Christian Kersebaum;Claas Nendel;Kiril Manevski

  • Application of a simple management model to simulate water and nitrogen dynamics

    K.C. Kersebaum

  • Coincidence of variation in yield and climate in Europe.

    Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio;Lauri Jauhiainen;Miroslav Trnka;Jörgen E. Olesen

Frequent Co-Authors

Claas Nendel
Claas Nendel University of Potsdam
Frank Ewert
Frank Ewert University of Bonn
Reimund P. Rötter
Reimund P. Rötter University of Göttingen
Jørgen E. Olesen
Jørgen E. Olesen Aarhus University
Thomas Gaiser
Thomas Gaiser University of Bonn
Roberto Ferrise
Roberto Ferrise University of Florence
Miroslav Trnka
Miroslav Trnka Czech Academy of Sciences
Marco Bindi
Marco Bindi University of Florence
Fulu Tao
Fulu Tao Chinese Academy of Sciences
Senthold Asseng
Senthold Asseng Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kurt Christian Kersebaum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles