World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 69 745 685 72 66 199 18995

Greg J. Rebetzke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Greg J. Rebetzke between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Greg J. Rebetzke published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2015. 8 of the 208 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2015. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications
1994 2025

208 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Greg J. Rebetzke: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 2
1997 3
1998 3
1999 4
2000 3
2001 10
2002 5
2003 6
2004 6
2005 6
2006 9
2007 11
2008 8
2009 4
2010 4
2011 7
2012 9
2013 8
2014 12
2015 17
2016 17
2017 7
2018 6
2019 12
2020 4
2021 4
2022 11
2023 1
2024 4
2025 4
Total 208
Download as CSV

Greg J. Rebetzke publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg J. Rebetzke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 196–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 199 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90 199
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Greg J. Rebetzke D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg J. Rebetzke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32 69
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Agriculture
  • Agronomy

His primary scientific interests are in Agronomy, Plant breeding, Horticulture, Dwarfing and Selection. Anthesis, Water-use efficiency, Crop yield, Sowing and Poaceae are the subjects of his Agronomy studies. His study looks at the relationship between Water-use efficiency and fields such as Transpiration, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.

His Plant breeding research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Genetic correlation and Monogastric. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Genetic gain and Genetic variation. The Selection study combines topics in areas such as Quantitative trait locus and Molecular marker.

His most cited work include:

  • Breeding for high water-use efficiency. (826 citations)
  • Breeding Opportunities for Increasing the Efficiency of Water Use and Crop Yield in Temperate Cereals. (572 citations)
  • Improving Intrinsic Water-Use Efficiency and Crop Yield. (537 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Agronomy, Horticulture, Heritability, Quantitative trait locus and Plant breeding. His work in Agronomy is not limited to one particular discipline; it also encompasses Dwarfing. His research on Horticulture also deals with topics like

  • Botany together with Animal science,
  • Poaceae that intertwine with fields like Transpiration.

In his study, Canopy is strongly linked to Stomatal conductance, which falls under the umbrella field of Heritability. The Transgressive segregation and Doubled haploidy research Greg J. Rebetzke does as part of his general Quantitative trait locus study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Trait, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. In his research, Animal breeding is intimately related to Monogastric, which falls under the overarching field of Plant breeding.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (59.26%)
  • Horticulture (20.99%)
  • Heritability (18.52%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Agronomy (59.26%)
  • Crop (11.73%)
  • Sowing (14.20%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Agronomy, Crop, Sowing, Trait and Canopy. His Agronomy study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Transpiration. His Crop research includes elements of Functional genes and Linkage.

His studies deal with areas such as Dwarfing and Yield as well as Sowing. His study in Canopy is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Tiller, Anthesis and Stomatal conductance. Greg J. Rebetzke interconnects Biotechnology, Genetic gain, Genetic variation and Drought tolerance in the investigation of issues within Selection.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • High throughput determination of plant height, ground cover, and above-ground biomass in wheat with LiDAR (99 citations)
  • Methodology for High-Throughput Field Phenotyping of Canopy Temperature Using Airborne Thermography. (54 citations)
  • Dynamic quantification of canopy structure to characterize early plant vigour in wheat genotypes (54 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agriculture
  • Botany
  • Agronomy

Agronomy, Selection, Heritability, Canopy and Stomatal conductance are his primary areas of study. His is involved in several facets of Agronomy study, as is seen by his studies on Drought tolerance, Water-use efficiency and Cultivar. His studies in Water-use efficiency integrate themes in fields like Cropping, Vapour Pressure Deficit, Transpiration and Crop.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Genetic diversity, Allele, Adaptation and Genetic gain, Genetic variation in addition to Selection. His Heritability research focuses on subjects like Germplasm, which are linked to Water soluble carbohydrate, Yield, Agriculture, Photosynthesis and Test weight. His Canopy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Tiller and Anthesis.

Best Publications

  • Breeding for high water-use efficiency.

    Anthony G Condon;Robert I Richards;G J Rebetzke;Graham Farquhar

  • Breeding Opportunities for Increasing the Efficiency of Water Use and Crop Yield in Temperate Cereals.

    R. A. Richards;G. J. Rebetzke;A. G. Condon;A. F. van Herwaarden

  • Traits and selection strategies to improve root systems and water uptake in water-limited wheat crops

    A.P. Wasson;R.A. Richards;R. Chatrath;S.C. Misra

  • Improving Intrinsic Water-Use Efficiency and Crop Yield.

    Anthony G Condon;Robert I Richards;G J Rebetzke;Graham Farquhar

  • "Perfect" markers for the Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b dwarfing genes in wheat.

    M. H. Ellis;W. Spielmeyer;K. R. Gale;G. J. Rebetzke

  • Selection for reduced carbon isotope discrimination increases aerial biomass and grain yield of rainfed bread wheat

    G J Rebetzke;Anthony G Condon;Robert I Richards;Graham Farquhar

  • Breeding for improved water productivity in temperate cereals: phenotyping, quantitative trait loci, markers and the selection environment

    Richard A. Richards;Greg J. Rebetzke;Michelle Watt;A. G. (Tony) Condon

  • Genetic variation for improving the salt tolerance of durum wheat

    Rana Munns;RA Hare;RA James;GJ Rebetzke

  • Large root systems: are they useful in adapting wheat to dry environments?

    Jairo A. Palta;Xing Chen;Xing Chen;Stephen P. Milroy;Greg J. Rebetzke

  • Genetic improvement of early vigour in wheat

    G. J. Rebetzke;R. A. Richards

  • High throughput determination of plant height, ground cover, and above-ground biomass in wheat with LiDAR

    Jose A Jimenez-Berni;Jose A Jimenez-Berni;David M Deery;Pablo Rozas-Larraondo;Anthony Tony G Condon;Anthony Tony G Condon

  • Molecular mapping of gibberellin-responsive dwarfing genes in bread wheat.

    M. H. Ellis;G. J. Rebetzke;F. Azanza;R. A. Richards

  • Genotypic increases in coleoptile length improves stand establishment, vigour and grain yield of deep-sown wheat

    G J Rebetzke;R A Richards;N A Fettell;M Long

  • Genotypic variation in water-soluble carbohydrate accumulation in wheat

    Sari A. Ruuska;Greg J. Rebetzke;Anthony F. van Herwaarden;Richard A. Richards

  • The effect of different height reducing genes on the early growth of wheat

    Marc H Ellis;Greg J Rebetzke;Peter Chandler;David Bonnett

  • Implementation of markers in Australian wheat breeding

    Howard A Eagles;Harbans S Bariana;Francis C Ogbonnaya;Greg J Rebetzke

  • Sense and nonsense in conservation agriculture: Principles, pragmatism and productivity in Australian mixed farming systems

    John A. Kirkegaard;Mark K. Conyers;James R. Hunt;Clive A. Kirkby

  • Quantitative trait loci for water-soluble carbohydrates and associations with agronomic traits in wheat

    G. J. Rebetzke;A. F. van Herwaarden;C. Jenkins;M. Weiss

  • Field evaluation of early vigour for genetic improvement of grain yield in wheat

    TL Botwright;AG Condon;GJ Rebetzke;RA Richards

  • Identification of quantitative trait loci for traits conferring weed competitiveness in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

    R. K. Coleman;G. S. Gill;G. J. Rebetzke

  • Gibberellic acid-sensitive dwarfing genes reduce plant height to increase kernel number and grain yield of wheat.

    G. J. Rebetzke;R. A. Richards

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Richards
Richard A. Richards Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Anthony G. Condon
Anthony G. Condon Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Scott C. Chapman
Scott C. Chapman University of Queensland
Karine Chenu
Karine Chenu University of Queensland
Graham D. Farquhar
Graham D. Farquhar Australian National University
John A. Kirkegaard
John A. Kirkegaard University of Western Australia
Michelle Watt
Michelle Watt University of Melbourne
Wolfgang Spielmeyer
Wolfgang Spielmeyer Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Joseph W. Burton
Joseph W. Burton Agricultural Research Service
James B. Holland
James B. Holland North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Greg J. Rebetzke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles