World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
70
Citations
21685
World Ranking
20068
National Ranking
9993

Paul J. Wang publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Wang sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 454 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul J. Wang D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Wang sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul J. Wang is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Within this broad area, their research focuses on several subfields including Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments, Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias, Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation Studies, ECG Monitoring and Analysis, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, and Heart Failure Treatment and Management.

They have a significant number of publications across prominent journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • Circulation
  • Heart Rhythm
  • Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Their recent published papers include:

  • Guidance for cardiac electrophysiology during the COVID-19 pandemic from the Heart Rhythm Society COVID-19 Task Force; Electrophysiology Section of the American College of Cardiology; and the Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association, 2020, Heart Rhythm
  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2020, Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
  • Intrinsically stretchable electrode array enabled in vivo electrophysiological mapping of atrial fibrillation at cellular resolution, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Guidance for Cardiac Electrophysiology During the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Heart Rhythm Society COVID-19 Task Force; Electrophysiology Section of the American College of Cardiology; and the Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association, 2020, Circulation
  • Knowledge Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities in Health and Prevention Research for Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders: A Report From the 2021 National Institutes of Health Workshop, 2022, Annals of Internal Medicine

Collaborations have been a notable aspect of their career, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Sanjiv M. Narayan
  • Albert J. Rogers
  • Tina Baykaner
  • Nitish Badhwar
  • Prasanth Ganesan

Their research often integrates clinical and technological perspectives, as seen in their work on cardiac electrophysiology, arrhythmia management, and the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning in cardiac studies. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in their contributions to the understanding of electrophysiological mechanisms and the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Best Publications

  • Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks in MADIT II : Frequency, Mechanisms, Predictors, and Survival Impact

    James P. Daubert;Wojciech Zareba;David S. Cannom;Scott McNitt

  • Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT)

    Wojciech Zareba;Helmut Klein;Iwona Cygankiewicz;W. Jackson Hall

  • Pulmonary-vein isolation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure.

    Mohammed N. Khan;Pierre Jaïs;Jennifer Cummings;Luigi Di Biase;Luigi Di Biase

  • Left atrial appendage: An underrecognized trigger site of atrial fibrillation

    Luigi Di Biase;Luigi Di Biase;J. David Burkhardt;Prasant Mohanty;Javier Sanchez

  • Diagnosing syncope. Part 1: Value of history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians.

    Mark Linzer;Eric H. Yang;N. A.Mark Estes;Paul Wang

  • Drug Screening Using a Library of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell–Derived Cardiomyocytes Reveals Disease-Specific Patterns of Cardiotoxicity

    Ping Liang;Feng Lan;Andrew S. Lee;Tingyu Gong

  • Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

    James V. Freeman;Ruo P. Zhu;Douglas K. Owens;Alan M. Garber

  • Cryoablation catheter and method of performing cryoablation

    Peter L. Friedman;Paul J. Wang;Ernest G. Cravalho

  • An experimental model of sudden death due to low-energy chest-wall impact (commotio cordis)

    Mark S. Link;Paul J. Wang;Natesa G. Pandian;Saroja Bharati

  • The clinical implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing in the multicenter automatic defibrillator trial II.

    Jonathan S. Steinberg;Avi Fischer;Paul Wang;Claudio Schuger

  • Diagnosing syncope. Part 2 : Unexplained syncope

    Mark Linzer;Eric H. Yang;N. A.Mark Estes;Paul Wang

  • Interference with cardiac pacemakers by cellular telephones

    David L. Hayes;Paul J. Wang;Dwight W. Reynolds;N.A. Mark Estes

  • Periprocedural Stroke and Management of Major Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: The Impact of Periprocedural Therapeutic International Normalized Ratio

    Luigi Di Biase;Luigi Di Biase;J. David Burkhardt;Prasant Mohanty;Javier Sanchez

  • Improving survival from sudden cardiac arrest: the role of the automated external defibrillator.

    John P. Marenco;Paul J. Wang;Mark S. Link;Munther K. Homoud

  • Cardiac system and method for treatment of cardiac arrhythmias and transmyocardial revascularization

    Paul Wang;Hassan Rastegar

  • Adverse cardiovascular events temporally associated with ma huang, an herbal source of ephedrine.

    David Samenuk;Mark S. Link;Munther K. Homoud;Robert Contreras

  • Guidance for Cardiac Electrophysiology During the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Heart Rhythm Society COVID-19 Task Force; Electrophysiology Section of the American College of Cardiology; and the Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association.

    Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy;Mina K Chung;Rakesh Gopinathannair;Kristen K Patton

  • Procedural complications, rehospitalizations, and repeat procedures after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

    Rashmee U. Shah;James V. Freeman;David Shilane;Paul J. Wang

  • Wide-aperture catheter-based microwave cardiac ablation antenna

    Carey M. Rappaport;Paul Wang;Zeji Gu

  • Fermi Large Area Telescope Measurements of the Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emission at Intermediate Galactic Latitudes

    A. A. Abdo;A. A. Abdo;M. Ackermann;M. Ajello;B. Anderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S. Link
Mark S. Link The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
N.A. Mark Estes
N.A. Mark Estes Tufts Medical Center
Olaf Reimer
Olaf Reimer University of Innsbruck
Diego F. Torres
Diego F. Torres Institute of Space Sciences
C. C. Cheung
C. C. Cheung United States Naval Research Laboratory
Julie McEnery
Julie McEnery Goddard Space Flight Center
Yasushi Fukazawa
Yasushi Fukazawa Hiroshima University
Jun Kataoka
Jun Kataoka Waseda University
Igor V. Moskalenko
Igor V. Moskalenko Stanford University
A. Morselli
A. Morselli National Institute for Nuclear Physics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Alongside traditional medical degrees, there are various online pathways and allied health careers that offer flexibility and faster entry into the healthcare field. For those interested in nursing, there are online MSN programs for non nurses, which allow individuals from different backgrounds to earn an advanced nursing degree without prior nursing experience.

If you’re looking for a more accessible entry point, ADN nursing programs are a great option. These associate degree programs often have less competitive admissions and can get you into the nursing workforce more quickly.

For those interested in administrative roles, medical billing and coding online schools provide flexible options that can be completed from home, often with financial aid available.

Additionally, there are nursing schools that don't require teas or HESI exams, making the admissions process simpler for prospective students. Exploring these varied online pathways can help you find a healthcare career that fits your goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Paul J. Wang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles