World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
71
Citations
25255
World Ranking
19943
National Ranking
9932

Neuroscience

D-Index
71
Citations
25228
World Ranking
2363
National Ranking
1119

Horacio Kaufmann publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Horacio Kaufmann sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 341 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Horacio Kaufmann D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Horacio Kaufmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Horacio Kaufmann is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with specific emphasis on Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Physiology.

The scientist's work addresses multiple topics within neurological and medical research, including:

  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Neurological diseases and metabolism
  • Neurological disorders and treatments

Frequent coauthors in Kaufmann's research include Jose-Alberto Palma, Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann, Italo Biaggioni, Gregor K. Wenning, and Alessandra Fanciulli.

Publications by Kaufmann appear predominantly in journals such as Neurology, Clinical Autonomic Research, Movement Disorders, Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, and Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. These venues reflect a strong focus on neurological disorders and autonomic function.

Among the recent papers associated with Kaufmann are:

  • The Movement Disorder Society Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy, 2022, Movement Disorders
  • Genome sequencing analysis identifies new loci associated with Lewy body dementia and provides insights into its genetic architecture, 2021, Nature Genetics
  • Baroreflex Dysfunction, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Multiple system atrophy, 2022, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Diagnosis and treatment of orthostatic hypotension, 2022, The Lancet Neurology

Kaufmann's scholarly output includes extensive contributions to understanding autonomic disorders and neurodegenerative diseases with a particular interest in conditions such as orthostatic hypotension, multiple system atrophy, and Lewy body dementia.

Best Publications

  • Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy

    S. Gilman;G. K. Wenning;P. A. Low;D. J. Brooks

  • Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome.

    Roy Freeman;Wouter Wieling;Felicia B. Axelrod;David G. Benditt

  • Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome

    Roy Freeman;Wouter Wieling;Felicia B. Axelrod;David G. Benditt

  • The Movement Disorder Society Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy

    Unknown

  • Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, pure autonomic failure and multiple system atrophy

    Unknown

  • Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study with midodrine

    Joseph Jankovic;Janice L. Gilden;Bradley C. Hiner;Horacio Kaufmann

  • The recommendations of a consensus panel for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and associated supine hypertension

    Christopher H. Gibbons;Peter Schmidt;Italo Biaggioni;Camille Frazier-Mills

  • Genome sequencing analysis identifies new loci associated with Lewy body dementia and provides insights into its genetic architecture

    Ruth Chia;Marya S. Sabir;Sara Bandres-Ciga

  • A double-blind, dose-response study of midodrine in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension

    R. A. Wright;H. C. Kaufmann;R. Perera;T. L. Opfer-Gehrking

  • Droxidopa for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension A randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

    Horacio Kaufmann;Roy Freeman;Italo Biaggioni;Phillip Low

  • Epidemiology of reflex syncope.

    N. Colman;K. Nahm;K. S. Ganzeboom;W. K. Shen

  • Autonomic failure as the initial presentation of Parkinson disease and dementia with Lewy bodies

    Horacio Kaufmann;Kirsty Nahm;Dushyant Purohit;David Wolfe

  • Assessment: Botulinum neurotoxin in the treatment of autonomic disorders and pain (an evidence-based review): Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    M. Naumann;Y. So;C. E. Argoff;M. K. Childers

  • Baroreflex Dysfunction.

    Unknown

  • Natural history of pure autonomic failure: A United States prospective cohort.

    Horacio Kaufmann;Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann;Jose-Alberto Palma;Italo Biaggioni

  • Consensus statement on the definition of neurogenic supine hypertension in cardiovascular autonomic failure by the American Autonomic Society (AAS) and the European Federation of Autonomic Societies (EFAS) : Endorsed by the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH).

    Alessandra Fanciulli;Jens Jordan;Italo Biaggioni;Giovanna Calandra–Buonaura

  • Norepinephrine deficiency in Parkinson's disease: The case for noradrenergic enhancement

    Alberto J. Espay;Peter A. LeWitt;Horacio Kaufmann

  • The distribution of Lewy bodies in pure autonomic failure: autopsy findings and review of the literature.

    K. Hague;P. Lento;S. Morgello;S. Caro

  • Multiple system atrophy

    Unknown

  • The Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ): validation of a novel symptom assessment scale

    Horacio Kaufmann;Richard Malamut;Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann;Kathleen Rosa

  • Norepinephrine Precursor Therapy in Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension

    Horacio Kaufmann;Daniela Saadia;Andrei Voustianiouk;David S. Goldstein

  • Cognitive impairment in multiple system atrophy: A position statement by the neuropsychology task force of the MDS multiple system atrophy (MODIMSA) study group

    Iva Stankovic;Florian Krismer;Aleksandar Jesic;Angelo Antonini

  • Brain magnetic resonance imaging in multiple-system atrophy and Parkinson disease: a diagnostic algorithm.

    Kirsty Bhattacharya;Daniela Saadia;Barbara Eisenkraft;Melvin Yahr

  • Plasma endothelin during upright tilt: relevance for orthostatic hypotension?

    H. Kaufmann;E. Oribe;J.A. Oliver

  • Orthostatic heart rate changes in patients with autonomic failure caused by neurodegenerative synucleinopathies

    Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann;Horacio Kaufmann;Jose-Alberto Palma;Cyndya A Shibao

  • Vestibular control of sympathetic activity. An otolith-sympathetic reflex in humans

    H. Kaufmann;I. Biaggioni;A. Voustianiouk;A. Diedrich

  • Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy

    G. K. Wenning;S. Gilman;K. Seppi

Frequent Co-Authors

Italo Biaggioni
Italo Biaggioni Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Roy Freeman
Roy Freeman Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Gregor K. Wenning
Gregor K. Wenning Innsbruck Medical University
Phillip A. Low
Phillip A. Low Mayo Clinic
David Robertson
David Robertson Vanderbilt University
Vaughan G. Macefield
Vaughan G. Macefield Monash University
Klaus Seppi
Klaus Seppi Innsbruck Medical University
Werner Poewe
Werner Poewe Innsbruck Medical University
Jens Jordan
Jens Jordan German Aerospace Center
David S. Goldstein
David S. Goldstein National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Neuroscience in the USA opens doors to diverse fields, but it’s important to consider related pathways that offer flexibility and high earning potential. Many students are exploring the best majors in college to align their passion with lucrative careers. Allied fields like psychology, biology, or even computer science can complement or serve as alternatives to neuroscience studies.

To reduce financial burdens, you may consider enrolling in one of the cheapest online college options that accept FAFSA. These programs help students save money while accessing accredited and respected degrees in science and health-related fields.

Additionally, earning specialized credentials can boost your job prospects. There are many what certificates can I get online that can fast-track your entry into healthcare, research, or tech roles.

If balancing studies with work and other commitments is a priority, you might explore some of the easy bachelor degrees online for a more flexible academic journey. Choosing the right degree pathway can help you achieve your career goals efficiently and affordably.

Best Scientists Citing Horacio Kaufmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles