World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
51536
World Ranking
12423
National Ranking
671

Jens Jordan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Jordan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 568 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jens Jordan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Jordan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jens Jordan is affiliated with the German Aerospace Center in Germany and specializes in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology, Genetics, Surgery, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their research addresses a variety of topics mainly centered on cardiovascular health and physiological effects related to spaceflight and environmental conditions. Key topics in their work include:

  • Spaceflight effects on biology
  • High Altitude and Hypoxia
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Neuroscience of respiration and sleep

Jens Jordan has contributed to publications in several venues frequently, including the following:

  • Clinical Autonomic Research
  • Hypertension
  • Frontiers in Physiology
  • Journal of Hypertension
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Recent papers authored by Jens Jordan or featuring their contributions cover a range of cardiovascular topics and guidelines, including:

  • 2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension, 2023, Journal of Hypertension
  • Recommendations for tilt table testing and other provocative cardiovascular autonomic tests in conditions that may cause transient loss of consciousness, 2021, Clinical Autonomic Research
  • Orthostatic Hypertension, 2020, Hypertension
  • How spaceflight challenges human cardiovascular health, 2022, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
  • Recommendations for tilt table testing and other provocative cardiovascular autonomic tests in conditions that may cause transient loss of consciousness: Consensus statement of the European Federation of Autonomic Societies (EFAS) endorsed by the American Autonomic Society (AAS) and the European Academy of Neurology (EAN), 2021, Autonomic Neuroscience

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field. Notable co-authors include:

  • Jens Tank
  • Fabian Hoffmann
  • Ulrich Limper
  • Karsten Heusser
  • Darius A. Gerlach

Best Publications

  • 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

    Giuseppe Mancia;Robert Fagard;Krzysztof Narkiewicz;Josep Redon

  • Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome.

    Roy Freeman;Wouter Wieling;Felicia B. Axelrod;David G. Benditt

  • Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome

    Roy Freeman;Wouter Wieling;Felicia B. Axelrod;David G. Benditt

  • Activation of the peripheral endocannabinoid system in human obesity.

    Stefan Engeli;Jana Böhnke;Mareike Feldpausch;Kerstin Gorzelniak

  • Dysregulation of the Peripheral and Adipose Tissue Endocannabinoid System in Human Abdominal Obesity

    Matthias Blüher;Stefan Engeli;Nora Klöting;Janin Berndt

  • Orthostatic Intolerance and Tachycardia Associated with Norepinephrine-Transporter Deficiency

    John R. Shannon;Nancy L. Flattem;Jens Jordan;Giris Jacob

  • Carotid Baroreceptor Stimulation, Sympathetic Activity, Baroreflex Function, and Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients

    Karsten Heusser;Jens Tank;Stefan Engeli;André Diedrich

  • Novel baroreflex activation therapy in resistant hypertension: results of a European multi-center feasibility study.

    Ingrid J. M. Scheffers;Abraham A. Kroon;Juerg Schmidli;Jens Jordan;Jens Jordan

  • Retinol-binding protein 4 in human obesity.

    Jürgen Janke;Stefan Engeli;Michael Boschmann;Frauke Adams

  • The pressor response to water drinking in humans : a sympathetic reflex?

    Jens Jordan;John R. Shannon;Bonnie K. Black;Yasmine Ali

  • Phenotyping and outcome on contemporary management in a German cohort of patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy

    A. Haghikia;E. Podewski;E. Libhaber;E. Libhaber;S. Labidi

  • Randomized comparison of reduced fat and reduced carbohydrate hypocaloric diets on intrahepatic fat in overweight and obese human subjects.

    Sven Haufe;Sven Haufe;Stefan Engeli;Petra Kast;Jana Böhnke

  • Consensus statement on the definition of neurogenic supine hypertension in cardiovascular autonomic failure by the American Autonomic Society (AAS) and the European Federation of Autonomic Societies (EFAS) : Endorsed by the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH).

    Alessandra Fanciulli;Jens Jordan;Italo Biaggioni;Giovanna Calandra–Buonaura

  • Water Drinking Acutely Improves Orthostatic Tolerance in Healthy Subjects

    Christoph Schroeder;Victoria E. Bush;Lucy J. Norcliffe;Friedrich C. Luft

  • Catheter-Based Renal Nerve Ablation and Centrally Generated Sympathetic Activity in Difficult-to-Control Hypertensive Patients: Prospective Case Series

    Julia Brinkmann;Karsten Heusser;Bernhard M. Schmidt;Jan Menne

  • Water drinking as a treatment for orthostatic syndromes

    John R Shannon;Andre Diedrich;Italo Biaggioni;Jens Tank

  • Water-Induced Thermogenesis

    Michael Boschmann;Jochen Steiniger;Uta Hille;Jens Tank

  • Women have lower tonic autonomic support of arterial blood pressure and less effective baroreflex buffering than men

    Demetra D. Christou;Pamela Parker Jones;Jens Jordan;André Diedrich

  • Joint statement of the European Association for the Study of Obesity and the European Society of Hypertension: obesity and difficult to treat arterial hypertension.

    Jens Jordan;Volkan Yumuk;Markus Schlaich;Peter M. Nilsson

  • A potent pressor response elicited by drinking water.

    Jens Jordan;John R Shannon;Eric Grogan;Italo Biaggioni

Frequent Co-Authors

Friedrich C. Luft
Friedrich C. Luft Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Dimitrios Tsikas
Dimitrios Tsikas Hannover Medical School
David Robertson
David Robertson Vanderbilt University
Italo Biaggioni
Italo Biaggioni Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Jeanette Schulz-Menger Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Guido Grassi
Guido Grassi University of Milano-Bicocca
Hermann Haller
Hermann Haller Hannover Medical School
Sandor Batkai
Sandor Batkai Cardior Pharmaceuticals
Fred C.G.J. Sweep
Fred C.G.J. Sweep Radboud University
Horacio Kaufmann
Horacio Kaufmann New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to numerous online degree programs and career options in healthcare. For many aspiring medical professionals, flexibility and accelerated learning are crucial—especially for nurses and advanced practitioners. If you’re looking for quick advancement, the fastest dnp program offers a pathway to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree efficiently, helping you climb the career ladder rapidly.

Cost is another factor to consider. The cheapest online dnp programs offer reputable DNP degrees at a lower tuition, making advanced nursing education more accessible. For those starting out or seeking entry-level nursing roles, LPN programs provide a timely solution—consider enrolling in the fastest lpn program to quickly launch your healthcare career.

Mental health is an expanding field, and the fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program gives you the skills to become a specialist in this vital area. Exploring these online pathways can help you save time and resources while staying competitive in the evolving medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Jens Jordan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles