World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
65436
World Ranking
8726
National Ranking
259

Markus P. Schlaich publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus P. Schlaich sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 669 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Markus P. Schlaich D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus P. Schlaich sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Markus P. Schlaich is affiliated with the University of Western Australia in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Other notable fields of study include surgery, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, civil and structural engineering, and nutrition and dietetics.

The scientist's main research topics include blood pressure and hypertension studies, heart rate variability and autonomic control, cardiovascular health and disease prevention, sodium intake and health, hormonal regulation and hypertension, cardiovascular syncope and autonomic disorders, and diabetes treatment and management.

Publications by Markus P. Schlaich span several venues, with frequent contributions seen in:

  • Journal of Hypertension
  • Hypertension
  • European Heart Journal
  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Collaborations are an important aspect of their work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Aletta E. Schutte
  • Janis M. Nolde
  • Revathy Carnagarin
  • Krzysztof Narkiewicz
  • George S. Stergiou

Recently published papers demonstrating their research contributions are:

  • Dual endothelin antagonist aprocitentan for resistant hypertension (PRECISION): a multicentre, blinded, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3 trial, 2022, The Lancet
  • 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines, 2020, Hypertension
  • 2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines, 2020, Journal of Hypertension
  • May Measurement Month 2019, 2020, Hypertension
  • SGLT2 Inhibitor-Induced Sympathoinhibition, 2020, JACC Basic to Translational Science

Best Publications

  • Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

    Christopher J.L. Murray;Christopher J.L. Murray;Christopher J.L. Murray;Aleksandr Y. Aravkin;Aleksandr Y. Aravkin;Aleksandr Y. Aravkin;Peng Zheng;Peng Zheng;Peng Zheng;Cristiana Abbafati;Cristiana Abbafati;Cristiana Abbafati

  • Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

    Valery L Feigin;Benjamin A Stark;Catherine Owens Johnson;Gregory A Roth

  • 2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines.

    Thomas Unger;Claudio Borghi;Fadi Charchar;Nadia A Khan

  • Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): A randomised controlled trial

    Murray D. Esler;Henry Krum;Paul A. Sobotka;Markus P. Schlaich

  • Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study

    Henry Krum;Markus Schlaich;Robert Whitbourn;Paul Sobotka

  • Renal Sympathetic-Nerve Ablation for Uncontrolled Hypertension

    Markus P. Schlaich;Paul A. Sobotka;Henry Krum;Elisabeth Lambert

  • Renin-angiotensin system and cardiovascular risk

    Roland E Schmieder;Karl F Hilgers;Markus P Schlaich;Bernhard M W Schmidt

  • Effect of Renal Sympathetic Denervation on Glucose Metabolism in Patients With Resistant Hypertension A Pilot Study

    Felix Mahfoud;Markus Schlaich;Ingrid Kindermann;Christian Ukena

  • Sympathetic augmentation in hypertension: role of nerve firing, norepinephrine reuptake, and Angiotensin neuromodulation.

    Markus P. Schlaich;Elisabeth Lambert;David M. Kaye;Zygmunt Krozowski

  • Percutaneous renal denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension: final 3-year report of the Symplicity HTN-1 study

    Henry Krum;Markus P Schlaich;Paul A Sobotka;Michael Böhm

  • Relation Between Cardiac Sympathetic Activity and Hypertensive Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

    Markus P. Schlaich;David M. Kaye;Elisabeth Lambert;Marcus Sommerville

  • Renal sympathetic denervation for treatment of drug-resistant hypertension: one-year results from the Symplicity HTN-2 randomized, controlled trial

    Murray D Esler;Henry Krum;Markus Peter Schlaich;Roland E Schmieder

  • Renal Hemodynamics and Renal Function After Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension

    Felix Mahfoud;Bodo Cremers;Julia Janker;Britta Link

  • Sympathetic Activation in Chronic Renal Failure

    Markus P. Schlaich;Flora Socratous;Sarah Hennebry;Nina Eikelis

  • Renal Denervation as a Therapeutic Approach for Hypertension: Novel Implications for an Old Concept

    Markus P. Schlaich;Paul A. Sobotka;Henry Krum;Robert Whitbourn

  • Ambulatory Blood Pressure Changes After Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension

    Felix Mahfoud;Christian Ukena;Roland E. Schmieder;Bodo Cremers

  • Renal Denervation in Moderate to Severe CKD

    Dagmara Hering;Felix Mahfoud;Antony S. Walton;Henry Krum

  • Relevance of Sympathetic Nervous System Activation in Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome

    Alicia A. Thorp;Markus P. Schlaich

  • Substantial Reduction in Single Sympathetic Nerve Firing After Renal Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension

    Dagmara Hering;Elisabeth A. Lambert;Elisabeth A. Lambert;Petra Marusic;Antony S. Walton

  • Sympathetic nervous activation in obesity and the metabolic syndrome-causes, consequences and therapeutic implications

    Gavin William Lambert;Nora Straznicky;Elisabeth A Lambert;John Dixon

Frequent Co-Authors

Murray D. Esler
Murray D. Esler Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Gavin W. Lambert
Gavin W. Lambert Swinburne University of Technology
Roland E. Schmieder
Roland E. Schmieder University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Henry Krum
Henry Krum Monash University
Michael Böhm
Michael Böhm Saarland University
David M. Kaye
David M. Kaye The Alfred Hospital
Paul J. Nestel
Paul J. Nestel Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Mark Hamer
Mark Hamer University College London
Luis M. Ruilope
Luis M. Ruilope European University of Madrid
Karlheinz Peter
Karlheinz Peter Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering Medicine in the USA, there are several online degree options and alternative career pathways worth exploring. Many choose nursing as a flexible entry point, especially since there are affordable nursing programs available entirely online. These programs offer a strong foundation in clinical knowledge and patient care while allowing students to balance studies with other responsibilities.

Those with an RN license can pursue advancement with the cheapest rn to bsn program options. This pathway equips nurses with enhanced skills and opens doors to higher-paying roles. For career changers or graduates from non-nursing backgrounds, direct entry msn programs offer a fast-track route into advanced nursing positions.

If you aim for leadership or academic roles, consider online phd nursing programs. These degrees allow professionals to contribute to research, policy, and teaching. Each pathway offers flexibility, affordability, and distinct career outcomes for those passionate about healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Markus P. Schlaich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles