World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
133
Citations
114610
World Ranking
2171
National Ranking
229

Neil R. Poulter publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil R. Poulter sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 791 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Neil R. Poulter D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil R. Poulter sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 133 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Neil R. Poulter is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. They have contributed extensively to research in the field of medicine, particularly focusing on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine as a primary subfield. Their work also spans nutrition and dietetics, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, surgery, and health toxicology and mutagenesis.

Their research topics cover a wide spectrum that includes blood pressure and hypertension studies, sodium intake and health, heart rate variability and autonomic control, cardiovascular health and risk factors, climate change and health impacts, nutritional studies and diet, and diabetes treatment and management.

Neil R. Poulter has published a significant number of papers in various scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues where their work appears are:

  • European Heart Journal Supplements
  • Journal of Hypertension
  • UNC Libraries
  • Hypertension
  • European Heart Journal

Selected recent papers include:

  • 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines, 2020, Hypertension
  • 2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines, 2020, Journal of Hypertension
  • Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis, 2021, The Lancet
  • EU-Wide Cross-Sectional Observational Study of Lipid-Modifying Therapy Use in Secondary and Primary Care: the DA VINCI study, 2020, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
  • Age-stratified and blood-pressure-stratified effects of blood-pressure-lowering pharmacotherapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis, 2021, The Lancet

Frequent collaborators of Neil R. Poulter include:

  • Thomas Beaney
  • Aletta E. Schutte
  • Gabriele Kerr
  • Anca Chis Ster
  • Markus P. Schlaich

Their research contributions have been recognized with the award of Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

    Anushka Patel;Stephen MacMahon;John Chalmers

  • Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes

    Steven P. Marso;Gilbert H. Daniels;Kirstine Brown-Frandsen;Peter Kristensen

  • Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis.

    Kunihiro Matsushita;Marije van der Velde;Brad C. Astor;Mark Woodward

  • Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

    Peter S Sever;Björn Dahlöf;Neil R Poulter;Hans Wedel

  • 2003 European society of hypertension - European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

    G Mancia;EA Rosei;R Cifkova;G DeBacker

  • 2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines.

    Thomas Unger;Claudio Borghi;Fadi Charchar;Nadia A Khan

  • Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

    Björn Dahlöf;Peter S Sever;Neil R Poulter;Hans Wedel

  • Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States.

    Katharina Wolf-Maier;Richard S. Cooper;José R. Banegas;Simona Giampaoli

  • Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension.

    Peter M Rothwell;Sally C Howard;Eamon Dolan;Eoin O'Brien

  • Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.

    Rury R. Holman;M. Angelyn Bethel;Robert J. Mentz;Vivian P. Thompson

  • Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy.

    Rory Collins;Christina Reith;Jonathan Emberson;Jane Armitage

  • Hypertension Treatment and Control in Five European Countries, Canada, and the United States

    Katharina Wolf-Maier;Richard S. Cooper;Holly Kramer;José R. Banegas

  • Genetic analysis of over 1 million people identifies 535 new loci associated with blood pressure traits.

    Evangelos Evangelou;Evangelos Evangelou;Helen R. Warren;Helen R. Warren;David Mosen-Ansorena;Borbala Mifsud

  • Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004—BHS IV

    Williams B;Poulter Nr;Brown Mj;Davis M

  • Novel genetic associations for blood pressure identified via gene-alcohol interaction in up to 570K individuals across multiple ancestries

    Mary F. Feitosa;Aldi T. Kraja;Daniel I. Chasman;Yun J. Sung

  • Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes

    Johannes F.E. Mann;David D. Ørsted;Kirstine Brown-Frandsen;Steven P. Marso

  • Albuminuria and Kidney Function Independently Predict Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Diabetes

    Toshiharu Ninomiya;Vlado Perkovic;Bastiaan E de Galan;Bastiaan E de Galan;Sophia Zoungas

  • British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 2004 (BHS-IV): summary

    Bryan Williams;Neil R Poulter;Morris J Brown;Mark Davis

  • Compliance, Safety, and Effectiveness of Fixed-Dose Combinations of Antihypertensive Agents. A Meta-Analysis

    Ajay K. Gupta;Shazia Arshad;Neil R. Poulter

  • Genetic analysis of over 1 million people identifies 535 new loci associated with blood pressure traits

    Evangelos Evangelou;Helen R. Warren;David Mosen-Ansorena;Borbala Mifsu

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter S. Sever
Peter S. Sever Imperial College London
Mark Woodward
Mark Woodward Imperial College London
John Chalmers
John Chalmers University of New South Wales
Sophia Zoungas
Sophia Zoungas Monash University
Mark J. Caulfield
Mark J. Caulfield Queen Mary University of London
Björn Dahlöf
Björn Dahlöf Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Giuseppe Mancia
Giuseppe Mancia University of Milano-Bicocca
Hans Wedel
Hans Wedel University of Gothenburg
Bruce Neal
Bruce Neal George Institute for Global Health
Bryan Williams
Bryan Williams University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing in the healthcare field isn't limited to earning a traditional medical degree. Many students and professionals are exploring flexible avenues with online degrees that open doors to various career pathways. If you're interested in leadership or management roles, consider the cheapest mha online programs to earn a Master’s in Healthcare Administration without incurring high debt.

For licensed nurses aiming for top clinical roles, affordable cheapest online dnp programs provide an accessible way to obtain a Doctor of Nursing Practice. Meanwhile, those passionate about pharmacy may explore pharmacy school online options, which combine rigorous training with online flexibility.

Technology and data-driven healthcare is another growing field. Earning a health information management bachelor degree online can prepare you for roles in medical records and health informatics. Many of these online degree pathways are designed for affordability and convenience, helping you build a rewarding career in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Neil R. Poulter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles