World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Germany
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
132
Citations
88726
World Ranking
2275
National Ranking
110

Hermann Haller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hermann Haller sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,079 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Hermann Haller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hermann Haller sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 132 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Hermann Haller is affiliated with Hannover Medical School in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a focus on nephrology, immunology, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, surgery, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

They have contributed to numerous scientific publications, often appearing in journals such as:

  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Kidney International
  • Journal of Hypertension

Haller's main topics of research include:

  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management

Frequent co-authors in their work include Song Rong, Sibylle von Vietinghoff, Nelli Shushakova, Roland Schmitt, and Klaus Stahl.

Some recent papers by Hermann Haller and their colleagues include:

  • Steroidal and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in cardiorenal medicine, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Heart failure and chronic kidney disease manifestation and mortality risk associations in type 2 diabetes: A large multinational cohort study, 2020, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
  • The long-acting C5 inhibitor, Ravulizumab, is effective and safe in adult patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome naïve to complement inhibitor treatment, 2020, Kidney International
  • The dapagliflozin and prevention of adverse outcomes in chronic kidney disease (DAPA-CKD) trial: baseline characteristics, 2020, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Injury to the Endothelial Glycocalyx in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19, 2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Best Publications

  • 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

    Giuseppe Mancia;Robert Fagard;Krzysztof Narkiewicz;Josep Redon

  • Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management:: A European Society of Hypertension Task Force document

    Giuseppe Mancia;Stéphane Laurent;Enrico Agabiti-Rosei;Ettore Ambrosioni

  • Loss of Caveolae, Vascular Dysfunction, and Pulmonary Defects in Caveolin-1 Gene-Disrupted Mice

    Marek Drab;Paul Verkade;Marlies Elger;Michael Kasper

  • Olmesartan for the Delay or Prevention of Microalbuminuria in Type 2 Diabetes

    Hermann Haller;Sadayoshi Ito;Joseph L. Izzo;Andrzej Januszewicz

  • Patients with preeclampsia develop agonistic autoantibodies against the angiotensin AT1 receptor.

    Gerd Wallukat;Volker Homuth;Thorsten Fischer;Carsten Lindschau

  • Use of Doppler ultrasonography to predict the outcome of therapy for renal-artery stenosis

    Jörg Radermacher;Ajay Chavan;Jörg Bleck;Annabel Vitzthum

  • New-onset diabetes after transplantation: 2003 International consensus guidelines. Proceedings of an international expert panel meeting. Barcelona, Spain, 19 February 2003

    Jaime Davidson;Alan Wilkinson;Jacques Dantal;Francesco Dotta

  • Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

    Timothy H.J. Goodship;H. Terence Cook;Fadi Fakhouri;Fernando C. Fervenza

  • Erythropoietin regulates endothelial progenitor cells.

    Ferdinand H. Bahlmann;Kirsten de Groot;Jens-Michael Spandau;Aimee L. Landry

  • Statin-Induced Improvement of Endothelial Progenitor Cell Mobilization, Myocardial Neovascularization, Left Ventricular Function, and Survival After Experimental Myocardial Infarction Requires Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase

    Ulf Landmesser;Niels Engberding;Ferdinand H. Bahlmann;Arnd Schaefer

  • Effect of finerenone on albuminuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy : a randomized clinical trial

    George L Bakris;Rajiv Agarwal;Juliana C Chan;Mark E Cooper

  • NF-κB Inhibition Ameliorates Angiotensin II–Induced Inflammatory Damage in Rats

    Dominik N. Muller;Ralf Dechend;Eero M. A. Mervaala;Joon-Keun Park

  • Antiinflammatory Effects of Angiotensin II Subtype 1 Receptor Blockade in Hypertensive Patients With Microinflammation

    Danilo Fliser;Konrad Buchholz;Hermann Haller

  • Cardiovascular Effects of Systemic Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition With Asymmetrical Dimethylarginine in Humans

    Jan T. Kielstein;Burcu Impraim;Solveig Simmel;Stefanie M. Bode-Böger

  • Endothelial-Vasoprotective Effects of High-Density Lipoprotein Are Impaired in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus but Are Improved After Extended-Release Niacin Therapy

    Sajoscha A. Sorrentino;Christian Besler;Lucia Rohrer;Martin Meyer

  • The Renal Arterial Resistance Index and Renal Allograft Survival

    Jörg Radermacher;Michael Mengel;Sebastian Ellis;Stephan Stuht

  • Marked Increase of Asymmetric Dimethylarginine in Patients with Incipient Primary Chronic Renal Disease

    Jan T. Kielstein;Rainer H. Böger;Stefanie M. Bode-Böger;Jürgen C. Frölich

  • Carotid Baroreceptor Stimulation, Sympathetic Activity, Baroreflex Function, and Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients

    Karsten Heusser;Jens Tank;Stefan Engeli;André Diedrich

  • Mice With Disrupted BK Channel β1 Subunit Gene Feature Abnormal Ca2+ Spark/STOC Coupling and Elevated Blood Pressure

    Saskia Plüger;Jörg Faulhaber;Michael Fürstenau;Matthias Löhn

  • Novel baroreflex activation therapy in resistant hypertension: results of a European multi-center feasibility study.

    Ingrid J. M. Scheffers;Abraham A. Kroon;Juerg Schmidli;Jens Jordan;Jens Jordan

Frequent Co-Authors

Friedrich C. Luft
Friedrich C. Luft Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Jan T. Kielstein
Jan T. Kielstein Hannover Medical School
Michael Mengel
Michael Mengel University of Alberta
Danilo Fliser
Danilo Fliser Saarland University
Dominik N. Müller
Dominik N. Müller Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine
Thomas Thum
Thomas Thum Hannover Medical School
Luis M. Ruilope
Luis M. Ruilope European University of Madrid
Ralf Dechend
Ralf Dechend Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Eberhard Ritz
Eberhard Ritz Heidelberg University
Jens Jordan
Jens Jordan German Aerospace Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Medicine involves more than the traditional path to medical school. There are a variety of online degrees and programs that can help you enter or advance in the healthcare field—offering flexibility for working professionals or those with other commitments.

For those interested in nutrition and wellness within healthcare, the best online food science degree options can prepare you for roles in nutrition education, food safety, or public health. If you're aiming for healthcare leadership, the top cahme accredited mha programs are designed for aspiring managers and administrators in hospitals or clinics.

Registered nurses seeking to advance their qualifications without traditional in-person clinicals can benefit from online rn-bsn programs without clinicals. These programs cater to experienced nurses and increase job prospects in a competitive marketplace. Already have a strong clinical background? For advanced practice nurses, the fastest dnp program options provide an accelerated, flexible path to the highest level of nursing practice.

Each of these online pathways complements core medical training or offers alternative careers in healthcare—making it easier to find the right fit for your goals and background.

Best Scientists Citing Hermann Haller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles