World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Italy
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
68
Citations
24401
World Ranking
2049
National Ranking
28

Roberto Navigli publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Navigli sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 256 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Roberto Navigli D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Navigli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Roberto Navigli is affiliated with Sapienza University of Rome in Italy. Their research spans primarily the field of Computer Science, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence as the main subfield. Other subfields include Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Management Science and Operations Research, Information Systems, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

The core research topics addressed by Roberto Navigli include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Speech and dialogue systems

Recent scholarly work includes publications in major venues. Notable papers include:

  • "Biases in Large Language Models: Origins, Inventory, and Discussion" (2023), published in Journal of Data and Information Quality
  • "Knowledge Graphs" (2021), published in ACM Computing Surveys
  • "Knowledge Graphs" (2021), published in Synthesis Lectures on Data, Semantics and Knowledge
  • "One SPRING to Rule Them Both: Symmetric AMR Semantic Parsing and Generation without a Complex Pipeline" (2021), in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "SensEmBERT: Context-Enhanced Sense Embeddings for Multilingual Word Sense Disambiguation" (2020), in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Roberto Navigli's publication record also includes a book titled "Knowledge Graphs" (2022), published by Morgan & Claypool Publishers.

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Simone Conia
  • Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo
  • Eva Blomqvist
  • Michael Cochez
  • Claudia d'Amato

Frequent publication venues for Navigli's research are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

The combined contributions reflect a focus on advancing the understanding and application of knowledge graphs, semantic technologies, and natural language processing methods within artificial intelligence research.

Best Publications

  • Word sense disambiguation: A survey

    Roberto Navigli

  • BabelNet: The automatic construction, evaluation and application of a wide-coverage multilingual semantic network

    Roberto Navigli;Simone Paolo Ponzetto

  • Knowledge Graphs

    Aidan Hogan;Eva Blomqvist;Michael Cochez;Claudia d'Amato

  • Entity Linking meets Word Sense Disambiguation: A Unified Approach

    Andrea Moro;Alessandro Raganato;Roberto Navigli

  • BabelNet: Building a Very Large Multilingual Semantic Network

    Roberto Navigli;Simone Paolo Ponzetto

  • Learning Domain Ontologies from Document Warehouses and Dedicated Web Sites

    Roberto Navigli;Paola Velardi

  • Ontology learning and its application to automated terminology translation

    R. Navigli;P. Velardi;A. Gangemi

  • Structural semantic interconnections: a knowledge-based approach to word sense disambiguation

    R. Navigli;P. Velardi

  • A software engineering approach to ontology building

    Antonio De Nicola;Michele Missikoff;Roberto Navigli

  • Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021

    Chengqing Zong;Fei Xia;Wenjie Li;Roberto Navigli

  • The English lexical substitution task

    Diana McCarthy;Roberto Navigli

  • An Experimental Study of Graph Connectivity for Unsupervised Word Sense Disambiguation

    R. Navigli;M. Lapata

  • SensEmbed: Learning Sense Embeddings for Word and Relational Similarity

    Ignacio Iacobacci;Mohammad Taher Pilehvar;Roberto Navigli

  • Embeddings for word sense disambiguation: An evaluation study

    Ignacio Iacobacci;Mohammad Taher Pilehvar;Roberto Navigli

  • Word Sense Disambiguation: A Unified Evaluation Framework and Empirical Comparison

    Alessandro Raganato;Jose Camacho-Collados;Roberto Navigli

  • Biases in Large Language Models: Origins, Inventory, and Discussion

    Unknown

  • An analysis of ontology-based query expansion strategies

    Paola Velardi;R Navigli

  • GERBIL: General Entity Annotator Benchmarking Framework

    Ricardo Usbeck;Michael Röder;Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo;Ciro Baron

  • SemEval-2007 Task 10: English Lexical Substitution Task

    Diana McCarthy;Roberto Navigli

  • Knowledge-Rich Word Sense Disambiguation Rivaling Supervised Systems

    Simone Paolo Ponzetto;Roberto Navigli

  • Structural semantic interconnection: a knowledge-based approach to Word Sense Disambiguation

    Roberto Navigli;Paola Velardi

Frequent Co-Authors

Paola Velardi
Paola Velardi Sapienza University of Rome
Jose Camacho-Collados
Jose Camacho-Collados Cardiff University
Simone Paolo Ponzetto
Simone Paolo Ponzetto University of Mannheim
David Jurgens
David Jurgens University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Aldo Gangemi
Aldo Gangemi University of Bologna
Mirella Lapata
Mirella Lapata University of Edinburgh
Diana McCarthy
Diana McCarthy University of Cambridge
Philipp Cimiano
Philipp Cimiano Bielefeld University
Hans Uszkoreit
Hans Uszkoreit German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence
Horacio Saggion
Horacio Saggion Pompeu Fabra University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to numerous online degrees and professional routes. Choosing accredited online colleges is crucial, as recognized accreditation ensures academic quality and career credibility.

Tech enthusiasts with a creative edge may be interested in pursuing the best online game design degree. This path blends programming expertise with visual storytelling for a career in the dynamic game industry.

For those drawn to digital security, there is strong demand in the rapidly growing tech sector for graduates from online cybersecurity degree programs. These degrees focus on protecting networks, data, and infrastructure—skills highly valued by employers.

Beyond traditional tech roles, a computer science background also supports leadership in fields like engineering and building management. For example, earning an online construction management masters prepares graduates for oversight of complex projects and emerging digital construction solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Roberto Navigli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles