World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
105
Citations
56325
World Ranking
282
National Ranking
153

Eduard Hovy publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eduard Hovy sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 595 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Eduard Hovy D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eduard Hovy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For significant contributions to natural language processing, including text summarization, semantic analysis, entity/event coreference and sentiment analysis.

Overview

Eduard Hovy is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States and has an extensive record of research in computer science, particularly within artificial intelligence and natural language processing. Their work spans several interdisciplinary subfields and topics, emphasizing advanced computational techniques and applications.

The scientist's recent publications illustrate a focus on pre-trained language models, named entity recognition, factuality in large language models, and editor role identification in collaborative environments. Notable papers include:

  • Factuality challenges in the era of large language models and opportunities for fact-checking, 2024, Nature Machine Intelligence
  • Pre-Trained Language Models and Their Applications, 2022, Engineering
  • Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Models, 2021, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • Nested Named Entity Recognition via Second-best Sequence Learning and Decoding, 2020, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • Who Did What: Editor Role Identification in Wikipedia, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Their collaborative network includes frequent coauthors such as Piek Vossen, Varun Gangal, Martha Palmer, Tommaso Caselli, and Dheeraj Rajagopal, reflecting consistent interdisciplinary partnerships.

Eduard Hovy has contributed significantly to several publication venues, with numerous papers appearing in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University) with 61 publications
  • Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 4 publications
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 4 publications
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2 publications
  • Engineering, 1 publication

The main field of study is computer science, with a strong focus on artificial intelligence, as demonstrated by 173 publications in this subfield. Additional research interests include computer vision and pattern recognition, information systems, molecular biology, and sociology and political science.

Their research topics cover a broad range of areas within computer science and AI, including:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies

Eduard Hovy was recognized as a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) in 2017. The award citation highlights contributions to natural language processing areas such as text summarization, semantic analysis, entity/event coreference, and sentiment analysis.

Best Publications

  • Hierarchical Attention Networks for Document Classification

    Zichao Yang;Diyi Yang;Chris Dyer;Xiaodong He

  • End-to-end Sequence Labeling via Bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRF

    Xuezhe Ma;Eduard H. Hovy

  • Self-Training With Noisy Student Improves ImageNet Classification

    Qizhe Xie;Minh-Thang Luong;Eduard Hovy;Quoc V. Le

  • Determining the sentiment of opinions

    Soo-Min Kim;Eduard Hovy

  • Automatic evaluation of summaries using N-gram co-occurrence statistics

    Chin-Yew Lin;Eduard Hovy

  • Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Training

    Qizhe Xie;Zihang Dai;Eduard Hovy;Minh-Thang Luong

  • Automated Text Summarization in SUMMARIST

    Eduard Hovy;Chin-Yew Lin

  • Learning surface text patterns for a Question Answering System

    Deepak Ravichandran;Eduard Hovy

  • RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinations

    Guokun Lai;Qizhe Xie;Hanxiao Liu;Yiming Yang

  • OntoNotes: The 90% Solution

    Eduard Hovy;Mitchell Marcus;Martha Palmer;Lance Ramshaw

  • Retrofitting Word Vectors to Semantic Lexicons

    Manaal Faruqui;Jesse Dodge;Sujay Kumar Jauhar;Chris Dyer

  • Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government

    Soon Ae Chun;Stuart Shulman;Rodrigo Sandoval;Eduard Hovy

  • Visualizing and Understanding Neural Models in NLP

    Jiwei Li;Xinlei Chen;Eduard H. Hovy;Dan Jurafsky

  • AUTOMATED TEXT SUMMARIZATION AND THE SUMMARIST SYSTEM

    Eduard Hovy;Chin-Yew Lin

  • Introduction to the special issue on summarization

    Dragomir R. Radev;Eduard Hovy;Kathleen McKeown

  • Extracting Opinions, Opinion Holders, and Topics Expressed in Online News Media Text

    Soo-Min Kim;Eduard Hovy

  • The automated acquisition of topic signatures for text summarization

    Chin-Yew Lin;Eduard Hovy

  • Harnessing Deep Neural Networks with Logic Rules

    Zhiting Hu;Xuezhe Ma;Zhengzhong Liu;Eduard H. Hovy

  • Generating natural language under pragmatic constraints

    Eduard Hendrik Hovy

  • A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLP

    Steven Feng;Varun Gangal;Jason Wei;Sarath Chandar

Frequent Co-Authors

Chin-Yew Lin
Chin-Yew Lin Microsoft Research Asia (China)
Teruko Mitamura
Teruko Mitamura Carnegie Mellon University
Patrick Pantel
Patrick Pantel Facebook (United States)
Graham Neubig
Graham Neubig Carnegie Mellon University
Jiwei Li
Jiwei Li Zhejiang University
Zihang Dai
Zihang Dai Google (United States)
Jerry R. Hobbs
Jerry R. Hobbs University of Southern California
Judith L. Klavans
Judith L. Klavans University of Maryland, College Park
José Luis Ambite
José Luis Ambite University of Southern California
Dirk Hovy
Dirk Hovy Bocconi University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to various degree levels and career paths, especially with the flexibility of online education. Many students opt for easiest associate degree programs to quickly gain foundational IT skills and jumpstart their careers. These programs are often accessible and allow entry into entry-level tech roles or further study.

For those seeking advanced expertise, affordable master degree programs in computer science and related fields can deepen knowledge and enhance employability. Leadership opportunities in technology and education are achievable with a doctorate in leadership online or an ed d degree. These advanced degrees prepare graduates for roles in management, research, and academia.

Exploring a spectrum of online programs can help individuals balance affordability, speed, and career ambitions. Whether starting with an associate degree or pursuing a doctorate, carefully considering your options ensures you choose a path that suits your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Eduard Hovy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles