World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 37 10657 10359 4460 4276 131 6585

Judith L. Klavans publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Judith L. Klavans between 1982 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Judith L. Klavans published across 41 years, from 1982 to 2022, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2001. 4 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2001. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications
1982 2022

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Judith L. Klavans: publications per year, 1982 to 2022
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 2
1986 1
1987 2
1988 2
1989 0
1990 1
1991 3
1992 1
1993 3
1994 6
1995 2
1996 3
1997 4
1998 9
1999 5
2000 13
2001 18
2002 10
2003 7
2004 3
2005 7
2006 1
2007 5
2008 4
2009 2
2010 1
2011 4
2012 1
2013 1
2014 1
2015 2
2016 2
2017 0
2018 7
2019 1
2020 1
2021 1
2022 3
Total 140
Download as CSV

Judith L. Klavans publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith L. Klavans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 122–131 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 131 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544 131
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Judith L. Klavans D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith L. Klavans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990 37
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Judith L. Klavans is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence.

Their work encompasses several main topics, including:

  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis

An example of their recent published work is the paper titled "Unsupervised Stem-based Cross-lingual Part-of-Speech Tagging for Morphologically Rich Low-Resource Languages", published in 2022. This paper appeared in the Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies.

Judith L. Klavans has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including:

  • Ramy Eskander
  • Cass Lowry
  • Sujay Khandagale
  • Maria Polinsky
  • Smaranda Muresan

Their publications have appeared notably in venues such as:

  • Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

Best Publications

  • THE INDEPENDENCE OF SYNTAX AND PHONOLOGY IN CLITICIZATION

    Judith L. Klavans

  • Procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English grammars

    S. Abney;S. Flickenger;C. Gdaniec;C. Grishman

  • Tracking and summarizing news on a daily basis with Columbia's Newsblaster

    Kathleen R. McKeown;Regina Barzilay;David Evans;Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou

  • Towards multidocument summarization by reformulation: progress and prospects

    Kathleen R. McKeown;Judith L. Klavans;Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou;Regina Barzilay

  • SIMFINDER: A Flexible Clustering Tool for Summarization

    Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou;Judith L Klavans;Melissa L Holcombe;Regina Barzilay

  • Detecting Text Similarity over Short Passages: Exploring Linguistic Feature Combinations via Machine Learning

    Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou;Judith L. Klavans;Eleazar Eskin

  • Linear Segmentation and Segment Significance

    Min-Yen Kan;Judith L. Klavans;Kathleen R. McKeown

  • Tools and methods for computational lexicology

    Roy J. Byrd;Nicoletta Calzolari;Martin S. Chodorow;Judith L. Klavans

  • Expansion of Multi- Word Terms for Indexing and Retrieval Using Morphology and Syntax

    Christian Jacquemin;Judith L. Klavans;Evelyne Tzoukermann

  • Rapid understanding of scientific paper collections: Integrating statistics, text analytics, and visualization

    Cody Dunne;Ben Shneiderman;Robert Gove;Judith Klavans

  • The Balancing Act: Combining Symbolic and Statistical Approaches to Language

    Judith L. Klavans;Philip Resnik

  • The syntax of code-switching: Spanish and English

    Judith L. Klavans

  • System and method for document collection, grouping and summarization

    Kathleen R. McKeown;Regina Barzilay;Dave Evans;Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou

  • A procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English

    Ezra Black;Steven Abney;Dan Flickinger;Claudia Gdaniec

  • Columbia Newsblaster: multilingual news summarization on the web

    David Kirk Evans;Judith L. Klavans;Kathleen R. McKeown

  • Evaluation of the DEFINDER system for fully automatic glossary construction.

    Judith L. Klavans;Smaranda Muresan

  • A method for automatically building and evaluating dictionary resources

    Smaranda Muresan;Judith Klavans

  • PERSIVAL, a system for personalized search and summarization over multimedia healthcare information

    Kathleen R. McKeown;Shih-Fu Chang;James Cimino;Steven Feiner

  • Method and system for topical segmentation, segment significance and segment function

    Kathleen R. Mckeown;Judith L. Klavans;Min-Yen Kan

  • Customization in a unified framework for summarizing medical literature

    N. Elhadad;M. Y. Kan;J. L. Klavans;K. R. McKeown

  • The Role of Verbs in Document Analysis

    Judith L. Klavans;Min-Yen Kan

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathleen R. McKeown
Kathleen R. McKeown Columbia University
Min-Yen Kan
Min-Yen Kan National University of Singapore
Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou
Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou Columbia University
Eduard Hovy
Eduard Hovy Carnegie Mellon University
Dagobert Soergel
Dagobert Soergel University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Rebecca J. Passonneau
Rebecca J. Passonneau Pennsylvania State University
José Luis Ambite
José Luis Ambite University of Southern California
Jimmy Lin
Jimmy Lin University of Waterloo
Douglas W. Oard
Douglas W. Oard University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can significantly broaden your options in Computer Science and related fields. Many students prioritize affordability when deciding on higher education pathways. If you’re considering further study, you might find value in learning about some of the cheapest masters degrees available online, which can help you upskill without incurring heavy debt.

For those interested in leadership positions within tech or education, pursuing a PhD in leadership online or enrolling in online ed programs can help position you for high-level roles in organizations or academia. These options offer flexible learning formats while maintaining rigorous academic standards.

Beginners or those looking to quickly enter the workforce may prefer more accessible programs. Exploring the easiest associate's degree to get can be a strategic step, providing foundational knowledge and early career opportunities in tech fields.

With the wide range of online degrees now available, students can select a pathway that best fits their budget, schedule, and long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Judith L. Klavans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles