World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
84243
World Ranking
9297
National Ranking
629

Natalie J. Allen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie J. Allen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 91 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Natalie J. Allen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie J. Allen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Natalie J. Allen is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research primarily falls within the field of Health Professions, with a particular emphasis on General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Physiology, Speech and Hearing, and Education.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Healthcare Innovation and Challenges
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies

Recent publications by Natalie J. Allen include:

  • Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial to evaluate integrated support from pharmacist independent prescriber and third sector worker for people experiencing homelessness: the PHOENIx community pharmacy study, 2023, Pilot and Feasibility Studies
  • Patient and Public Involvement in Research Evaluating Integrated Care for People Experiencing Homelessness: Findings From the PHOENIx Community Pharmacy Pilot Randomised-Controlled Trial, 2024, Health Expectations
  • Team Processes and Outcomes During the AMADEE-18 Mars Analog Mission, 2020, Astrobiology
  • Pharmacy Homeless Outreach Engagement Non-medical Independent Prescribing Rx (PHOENIx) Community Pharmacy-Based Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial, 2025, Journal of Urban Health
  • Team-Member Role Characteristics as Predictors of Response Behavior on Team-Related Surveys, 2022, Small Group Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Natalie J. Allen include:

  • Vibhu Paudyal
  • Richard Lowrie
  • Helena Heath
  • Jane Moir
  • Nigel Barnes

Their publications appear often in venues such as:

  • Health Expectations
  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies
  • Astrobiology
  • Journal of Urban Health
  • Small Group Research

Best Publications

  • The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization

    Natalie J. Allen;John P. Meyer

  • A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment

    John P. Meyer;Natalie J. Allen

  • Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application

    John P. Meyer;Natalie Jean Allen

  • Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization.

    John P. Meyer;Natalie J. Allen;Catherine A. Smith

  • Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: An Examination of Construct Validity

    Natalie J. Allen;John P. Meyer

  • Testing the "Side-Bet Theory" of Organizational Commitment: Some Methodological Considerations

    John P. Meyer;Natalie J. Allen

  • Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: the role of affect and cognitions

    Kibeom Lee;Natalie J. Allen

  • Assessing dissimilarity relations under missing data conditions: Evidence from computer simulations

    Natalie J. Allen;David J. Stanley;Helen Williams;Sarah J. Ross

  • Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations.

    John P. Meyer;Natalie J. Allen;Ian R. Gellatly

  • Organizational socialization tactics : A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers' commitment and role orientation

    Natalie J. Allen;John P. Meyer

  • A meta-analytic review of occupational commitment : Relations with person- and work-related variables

    Kibeom Lee;Julie J. Carswell;Natalie J. Allen

  • Organizational commitment: Evidence of career stage effects?☆

    Natalie J. Allen;John P. Meyer

  • Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization.

    Unknown

  • Examination of the combined effects of work values and early work experiences on organizational commitment

    John P. Meyer;P. Gregory Irving;Natalie J. Allen

  • Development of Organizational Commitment During the First Year of Employment: A Longitudinal Study of Pre- and Post-Entry Influences

    John P. Meyer;D. Ramona Bobocel;Natalie J. Allen

  • Links between work experiences and organizational commitment during the first year of employment: A longitudinal analysis*

    John P. Meyer;Natalie J. Allen

  • The Three‐Component Model of Organisational Commitment: An Application to South Korea

    Kibeom Lee;Natalie J. Allen;John P. Meyer;Kyung-Yong Rhee

  • Construct Validation in Organizational Behavior Research: The Case of Organizational Commitment

    Natalie J. Allen;John P. Meyer

  • The ‘romance of teams’: Toward an understanding of its psychological underpinnings and implications

    Natalie J. Allen;Tracy D. Hecht

  • Examining the “pros” and “cons” of team conflict: A team-level meta-analysis of task, relationship, and process conflict.

    Thomas A. O'Neill;Natalie J. Allen;Stephanie E. Hastings

  • PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH VOLUNTEERS: A REVIEW

    Natalie J. Allen;J. Philippe Rushton

  • Commitment in a changing world of work.

    John P. Meyer;Natalie J. Allen;Laryssa Topolnytsky

Frequent Co-Authors

John P. Meyer
John P. Meyer University of Western Ontario
Kibeom Lee
Kibeom Lee University of Calgary
Michael West
Michael West Duke University
J. Philippe Rushton
J. Philippe Rushton University of Western Ontario
Cary L. Cooper
Cary L. Cooper University of Manchester
Susan Cartwright
Susan Cartwright Lancaster University
Scott A. MacDougall-Shackleton
Scott A. MacDougall-Shackleton University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology can open doors to a diverse range of career pathways, particularly in fields like social work and counseling. Many students choose to pursue online degrees for flexibility and accessibility, helping them meet specific state requirements more easily.

If you are considering a career in social work, it’s important to understand the unique West Virginia social work license requirements, as well as the Wisconsin social work license requirements. Each state sets its own expectations for education, licensure exams, and supervised experience. For those interested in practicing in the West, review the requirements to be a social worker in Wyoming to ensure you’re meeting local standards.

Those leaning toward counseling in the South may find the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Alabama particularly helpful. Understanding your desired career path’s academic and licensing requirements can help you choose the right online degree—and accelerate your professional journey in psychology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Natalie J. Allen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles