World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8050 7514 76 71 240 13132

Magnus Sverke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Magnus Sverke between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Magnus Sverke published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2013. 11 of the 319 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2013. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 39 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 4 publications
1993 2025

319 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Magnus Sverke: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 3
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 2
2000 7
2001 7
2002 14
2003 13
2004 5
2005 15
2006 21
2007 13
2008 18
2009 6
2010 14
2011 11
2012 7
2013 39
2014 18
2015 12
2016 11
2017 17
2018 13
2019 21
2020 5
2021 5
2022 3
2023 6
2024 7
2025 4
Total 319
Download as CSV

Magnus Sverke publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magnus Sverke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 240 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 240
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Magnus Sverke D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magnus Sverke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Magnus Sverke is affiliated with Stockholm University in Sweden and has contributed extensively to research in health professions, business management, and social sciences. Their work focuses broadly on employment and welfare studies, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, workplace health and well-being, and retirement, disability, and employment, among other related areas.

Their research spans several subfields including general health professions, organizational behavior and human resource management, demography, sociology and political science, and social psychology. This interdisciplinary approach allows for comprehensive exploration of workplace dynamics and individual well-being within organizational settings.

Among recent publications, notable papers include:

  • Does occupational self-efficacy mediate the relationships between job insecurity and work-related learning? A latent growth modelling approach (2021, Work & Stress)
  • A lead article to go deeper and broader in job insecurity research: Understanding an individual perception in its social and political context (2024, Applied Psychology)
  • Health- and Age-Related Workplace Factors as Predictors of Preferred, Expected, and Actual Retirement Timing: Findings from a Swedish Cohort Study (2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • Approaching retirement: A qualitative study of older nursing assistants' experiences of work in residential care and late-career planning (2021, Journal of Aging Studies)
  • Qualitative job insecurity and extra-role behaviours: The moderating role of work motivation and perceived investment in employee development (2022, Economic and Industrial Democracy)

Magnus Sverke works frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Helena Falkenberg
  • Johnny Hellgren
  • Petra Lindfors
  • Katharina Klug
  • Hans De Witte

Their publications are regularly featured in journals such as Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, Applied Psychology, Journal of Aging Studies, and the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. These venues reflect the thematic focus on occupational health, aging, and organizational studies.

The research topics covered by Magnus Sverke also include management and organizational studies, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, and ethics in business and education. This range highlights a multifaceted interest in both individual psychological factors and broader organizational processes affecting employment outcomes.

Best Publications

  • No security: a meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences.

    Magnus Sverke;Johnny Hellgren;Katharina Näswall

  • A Two-dimensional Approach to Job Insecurity: Consequences for Employee Attitudes and Well-being

    Johnny Hellgren;Magnus Sverke;Kerstin Isaksson

  • The Nature of Job Insecurity: Understanding Employment Uncertainty on the Brink of a New Millennium

    Magnus Sverke;Johnny Hellgren

  • Predicting Perceived Employability: Human Capital or Labour Market Opportunities?

    Erik Berntson;Magnus Sverke;Staffan Marklund

  • Does job insecurity lead to impaired well-being or vice versa? Estimation of cross-lagged effects using latent variable modelling

    Johnny Hellgren;Magnus Sverke

  • The interactive effect of job involvement and organizational commitment on job turnover revisited: a note on the mediating role of turnover intention.

    Anders Sjöberg;Magnus Sverke

  • Job insecurity A literature review

    Magnus Sverke;Johnny Hellgren;Katharina Näswall

  • The moderating role of personality characteristics on the relationship between job insecurity and strain

    Katharina Näswall;Magnus Sverke;Johnny Hellgren

  • Associations between quantitative and qualitative job insecurity and well-being : A Test in Belgian banks

    Hans De Witte;Nele De Cuyper;Yasmin Handaja;Magnus Sverke

  • The moderating role of employability in the association between job insecurity and exit, voice, loyalty and neglect

    Erik Berntson;Katharina Näswall;Magnus Sverke

  • Arbets- och organisationspsykologi : Individ och organisation i samspel

    Gunnar Aronsson;Johnny Hellgren;Kerstin Isaksson;Gunn Johansson

  • Job Insecurity and Union Membership: European Unions in the Wake of Flexible Production

    M Sverke;J Hellgren;K Näswall;A Chirumbolo

  • Investigating the relationship between employability and self-efficacy: A cross-lagged analysis

    Erik Berntson;Katharina Näswall;Magnus Sverke

  • Comparing three alternative types of employment with permanent full-time work: How do employment contract and perceived job conditions relate to health complaints?

    Claudia Bernhard-Oettel;Magnus Sverke;Hans De Witte

  • Predicting nurse burnout from demands and resources in three acute care hospitals under different forms of ownership: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey

    Niklas Hansen;Magnus Sverke;Katharina Näswall

  • The Individual in the Changing Working Life

    Katharina Näswall;Johnny Hellgren;Magnus Sverke

  • Exit, Voice and Loyalty Reactions to Job Insecurity in Sweden: Do Unionized and Non‐unionized Employees Differ?

    Magnus Sverke;Johnny Hellgren

  • A new conceptualization of union commitment: Development and test of an integrated theory.

    Magnus Sverke;Sarosh Kuruvilla

  • Contingent Employment Contracts: Are Existing Employment Theories Still Relevant?

    Daniel G. Gallagher;Magnus Sverke

  • Alternative Work Arrangements

    Magnus Sverke;Daniel G. Gallagher;Johnny Hellgren

  • A Meta-Analysis of Job Insecurity and Employee Performance: Testing Temporal Aspects, Rating Source, Welfare Regime, and Union Density as Moderators.

    Magnus Sverke;Lena Låstad;Lena Låstad;Johnny Hellgren;Anne Richter

  • The Consequences of Job Insecurity for Employers and Unions: Exit, Voice and Loyalty:

    Magnus Sverke;Sjoerd Goslinga

  • Dual Commitment to Company and Union in Sweden: An Examination of Predictors and Taxonomic Split Methods:

    Magnus Sverke;Anders Sjoberg

  • Threat of losing valued job features: The role of perceived control in mediating the effect of qualitative job insecurity on job strain and psychological withdrawal

    Tinne Van der Elst;Anne Richter;Magnus Sverke;Katharina Näswall

  • Work and Sleep—A Prospective Study of Psychosocial Work Factors, Physical Work Factors, and Work Scheduling

    Torbjörn Åkerstedt;Torbjörn Åkerstedt;Johanna Garefelt;Anne Richter;Anne Richter;Hugo Westerlund

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte KU Leuven
Antonio Chirumbolo
Antonio Chirumbolo Sapienza University of Rome
Gunnar Aronsson
Gunnar Aronsson Stockholm University
Göran Kecklund
Göran Kecklund Stockholm University
Hugo Westerlund
Hugo Westerlund Stockholm University
Torbjörn Åkerstedt
Torbjörn Åkerstedt Karolinska Institute
Martin Obschonka
Martin Obschonka Queensland University of Technology
Henrik Andershed
Henrik Andershed Örebro University
Rainer K. Silbereisen
Rainer K. Silbereisen Friedrich Schiller University Jena

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up a variety of career paths, each with unique requirements and outcomes. One common consideration is choosing the right program to fit your professional goals. For example, it’s important to understand the difference between masters in social work vs counseling, as these degrees can lead to very different roles in clinical, educational, or community settings.

Many students appreciate the flexibility and accessibility of the easy online psychology degrees now available from accredited universities. These programs often have streamlined admissions and convenient learning formats, making them ideal for working professionals or those with time constraints.

For those seeking a faster path to advancement, consider accelerated psychology master's programs that allow you to complete your graduate education in less time without sacrificing academic rigor. Likewise, you can pursue an accelerated counseling psychology degree online to advance your skills and start helping clients sooner. These online options can help you build a fulfilling career in psychology, counseling, or social work while offering the flexibility to fit your lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Magnus Sverke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles