World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4970 4608 2729 2470 157 11580

Tahira M. Probst publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tahira M. Probst between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tahira M. Probst published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2022. 14 of the 187 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2022. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 10 publications
1997 2025

187 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tahira M. Probst: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 3
2001 2
2002 2
2003 3
2004 6
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 5
2009 0
2010 8
2011 4
2012 6
2013 7
2014 11
2015 11
2016 13
2017 14
2018 6
2019 14
2020 11
2021 13
2022 17
2023 8
2024 4
2025 10
Total 187
Download as CSV

Tahira M. Probst publications per year - data summary

  • Tahira M. Probst, a Psychology scholar from Washington State University Vancouver, has 187 publications recorded across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2022, with 17 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1997, 2005 and 2006, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 29 years in the span carries no publications at all (2009).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.7 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 52 publications, 28% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 23 publications (2.3 per year); 2007-2016: 67 publications (6.7 per year); 2017-2025: 97 publications (10.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Tahira M. Probst publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tahira M. Probst sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 157 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 157
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tahira M. Probst publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Tahira M. Probst, a Psychology scholar from Washington State University Vancouver, records 157 publications - the 53rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 53% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Tahira M. Probst, and about 47% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Tahira M. Probst falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Tahira M. Probst D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tahira M. Probst sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Tahira M. Probst D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Tahira M. Probst, a Psychology scholar from Washington State University Vancouver, records 52 D-Index - the 57th percentile of the discipline.
  • 57% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Tahira M. Probst, and about 43% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Tahira M. Probst ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Tahira M. Probst is affiliated with Washington State University Vancouver in the United States. Their research focuses on health professions and social sciences, with particular attention to general health professions, sociology and political science, organizational behavior and human resource management, radiological and ultrasound technology, and social psychology.

The main topics addressed in their work include employment and welfare studies, workplace health and well-being, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, occupational health and safety research, work-family balance challenges, retirement, disability, and employment, as well as the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Probst has contributed to several academic publications, including:

  • Occupational Health Science in the Time of COVID-19: Now more than Ever (2020, Occupational Health Science)
  • Economic stressors and the enactment of CDC-recommended COVID-19 prevention behaviors: The impact of state-level context (2020, Journal of Applied Psychology)
  • Caught between Scylla and Charybdis: How Economic Stressors and Occupational Risk Factors Influence Workers' Occupational Health Reactions to COVID-19 (2020, Applied Psychology)
  • COVID-19 moral disengagement and prevention behaviors: The impact of perceived workplace COVID-19 safety climate and employee job insecurity (2022, Safety Science)
  • Precarious employment and self-reported experiences of unwanted sexual attention and sexual harassment at work. An analysis of the European Working Conditions Survey (2020, PLoS ONE)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Probst include:

  • Andrea Bazzoli
  • Лаура Петитта
  • Claudio Barbaranelli
  • Valerio Ghezzi
  • Hyun Jung Lee

Their research has been published in multiple venues, with notable numbers of publications in:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Safety Science
  • Applied Psychology
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Business and Psychology

Best Publications

  • The effects of job insecurity on employee safety outcomes: cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations.

    Tahira M. Probst;Ty L. Brubaker

  • Empowerment and continuous improvement in the United States, Mexico, Poland, and India: Predicting fit on the basis of the dimensions of power distance and individualism.

    Christopher Robert;Tahira M. Probst;Joseph J. Martocchio;Fritz Drasgow

  • Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization.

    Peter J. Carnevale;Tahira M. Probst

  • The Effects of Job Insecurity on Job Satisfaction, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Deviant Behavior, and Negative Emotions of Employees

    William D. Reisel;Tahira M. Probst;Swee-Lim Chia;Cesar M. Maloles

  • Development and validation of the Job Security Index and the Job Security Satisfaction scale: A classical test theory and IRT approach

    Tahira M. Probst

  • Productivity, counterproductivity and creativity: The ups and downs of job insecurity

    Tahira M. Probst;Susan M. Stewart;Melissa L. Gruys;Bradley W. Tierney

  • Organizational injury rate underreporting: the moderating effect of organizational safety climate.

    Tahira M. Probst;Ty L. Brubaker;Anthony Barsotti

  • Accident under-reporting among employees: Testing the moderating influence of psychological safety climate and supervisor enforcement of safety practices

    Tahira M. Probst;Armando X. Estrada

  • Safety and insecurity: exploring the moderating effect of organizational safety climate.

    Tahira M. Probst

  • Countering the negative effects of job insecurity through participative decision making: lessons from the demand-control model.

    Tahira M. Probst

  • Leadership decision-making: A behavioral reasoning theory analysis

    James D. Westaby;Tahira M. Probst;Barbara C. Lee

  • Culture and deception in business negotiations : A multilevel analysis

    Harry C. Triandis;Peter Carnevale;Michele Gelfand;Christopher Robert

  • Cultural Values as Moderators of Employee Reactions to Job Insecurity: The Role of Individualism and Collectivism

    Tahira M. Probst;John Lawler

  • Exploring Employee Outcomes of Organizational Restructuring A Solomon Four-Group Study

    Tahira M. Probst

  • Layoffs and tradeoffs: production, quality, and safety demands under the threat of job loss.

    Tahira M. Probst

  • A managerial and personal control model: predictions of work alienation and organizational commitment in Hungary

    Moshe Banai;William D Reisel;Tahira M Probst

  • Occupational Health Science in the Time of COVID-19: Now more than Ever.

    Robert R Sinclair;Tammy Allen;Lacie Barber;Mindy Bergman

  • Cultural Values in Intergroup and Single-Group Social Dilemmas.

    Tahira M Probst;Peter J Carnevale;Harry C Triandis

  • Catch me if I fall! Enacted uncertainty avoidance and the social safety net as country-level moderators in the job insecurity-job attitudes link.

    Maike E. Debus;Tahira M. Probst;Cornelius J. König;Martin Kleinmann

  • Wedded to the job: moderating effects of job involvement on the consequences of job insecurity.

    Tahira M. Probst

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudio Barbaranelli
Claudio Barbaranelli Sapienza University of Rome
Peter J. Carnevale
Peter J. Carnevale University of Southern California
Cornelius J. König
Cornelius J. König Saarland University
Leslie B. Hammer
Leslie B. Hammer Oregon Health & Science University
Martin Kleinmann
Martin Kleinmann University of Zurich
Emiko S. Kashima
Emiko S. Kashima La Trobe University
Harry C. Triandis
Harry C. Triandis University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Fritz Drasgow
Fritz Drasgow University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Martin S. Hagger
Martin S. Hagger University of California, Merced

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to multiple rewarding pathways, both academically and professionally. Many students broaden their horizons by exploring related fields, such as social work. Increasingly, most valuable online social work programs in the US are becoming popular options for those seeking flexibility and strong career prospects.

If you are considering geographic preferences or in-state tuition advantages, you might explore popular social work programs in North Carolina or look into programs in other areas, such as the best-ranked social work degree programs in Pittsburgh. These programs offer specialized coursework, practicum opportunities, and state-specific licensure preparation.

For those interested in online study, there is a growing list of highly rated virtual programs. For example, the most valuable online social work bachelor's programs in Ohio provide access to quality education and support networks. With both onsite and online options, psychology majors can find a pathway that aligns with their academic goals and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Tahira M. Probst

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles