World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 55 3919 3746 54 54 548 8703

Marco Trevisan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marco Trevisan between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marco Trevisan published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 16.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 129 publications in 2007. 9 of the 646 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 129. Peak 129 publications in 2007. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 68 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 100 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 129 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 38 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
1987 2025

646 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marco Trevisan: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 2
1990 0
1991 2
1992 4
1993 2
1994 3
1995 5
1996 3
1997 3
1998 1
1999 4
2000 68
2001 4
2002 6
2003 100
2004 7
2005 11
2006 8
2007 129
2008 13
2009 19
2010 15
2011 18
2012 38
2013 24
2014 22
2015 24
2016 16
2017 7
2018 13
2019 12
2020 12
2021 17
2022 15
2023 9
2024 5
2025 4
Total 646
Download as CSV

Marco Trevisan publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Trevisan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–550 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 548 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12 548
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Marco Trevisan D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Trevisan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177 55
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Marco Trevisan is affiliated with the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a particular concentration in Plant Science. Their scholarly output includes extensive studies across related subfields such as Molecular Biology, Pollution, Food Science, and Soil Science.

The scientist's work covers several main research topics, including:

  • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
  • Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
  • Horticultural and Viticultural Research
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution

Among their notable publications are:

  • Biogenic ZnO Nanoparticles Synthesized Using a Novel Plant Extract: Application to Enhance Physiological and Biochemical Traits in Maize, 2021, published in Nanomaterials
  • Exogenous application of ZnO nanoparticles and ZnSO4 distinctly influence the metabolic response in Phaseolus vulgaris L., 2021, published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Changes in the chemical and sensory profile of ripened Italian salami following the addition of different microbial starters, 2021, published in Meat Science
  • Plant species-specific impact of polyethylene microspheres on seedling growth and the metabolome, 2022, published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Identification of markers of sensory quality in ground coffee: an untargeted metabolomics approach, 2020, published in Metabolomics

Trevisan frequently publishes in various journals, with multiple contributions to:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Plant Science
  • Food Chemistry
  • Plants

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, including:

  • Luigi Lucini (35 coauthored works)
  • Begoña Miras-Moreno (14 coauthored works)
  • Edoardo Puglisi (13 coauthored works)
  • Leilei Zhang (10 coauthored works)
  • Gabriele Rocchetti (9 coauthored works)

Best Publications

  • Integrated membrane processes for the concentration of tomato juice

    A. Bottino;G. Capannelli;A. Turchini;P. Della Valle

  • Comparison and evaluation of eight pesticide environmental risk indicators developed in Europe and recommendations for future use

    J. Reus;P. Leendertse;C. Bockstaller;I. Fomsgaard

  • A European test of pesticide-leaching models: methodology and major recommendations

    M. Vanclooster;J.J.T.I. Boesten;M. Trevisan;C.D. Brown

  • Sewage sludge for sustainable agriculture: contaminants’ contents and potential use as fertilizer

    Lucrezia Lamastra;Nicoleta Alina Suciu;Marco Trevisan

  • Mitigation of agricultural nonpoint-source pesticide pollution in artificial wetland ecosystems

    Caroline Gregoire;David Elsaesser;David Huguenot;Jens Lange

  • A new approach to assessing the water footprint of wine: an Italian case study.

    Lucrezia Lamastra;Nicoleta Alina Suciu;Elisa Novelli;Marco Trevisan

  • Soil Bacterial Diversity Screening Using Single 16S rRNA Gene V Regions Coupled with Multi-Million Read Generating Sequencing Technologies

    Sotirios Vasileiadis;Edoardo Puglisi;Maria Arena;Fabrizio Cappa

  • Bioavailability and degradation of phenanthrene in compost amended soils

    Edoardo Puglisi;Fabrizio Cappa;George Fragoulis;Marco Trevisan

  • Health-promoting substances and heavy metal content in tomatoes grown with different farming techniques

    Filippo Rossi;Francesco Godani;Terenzio Bertuzzi;Marco Trevisan

  • Monitoring tricyclazole residues in rice paddy watersheds.

    Laura Padovani;Ettore Capri;Caterina Padovani;Edoardo Puglisi

  • Biomassbed: a biological system to reduce pesticide point contamination at farm level

    Costantino Vischetti;Ettore Capri;Marco Trevisan;Cristiano Casucci

  • Recycled paper-paperboard for food contact materials: contaminants suspected and migration into foods and food simulant.

    Nicoleta A. Suciu;Francesca Tiberto;Sotirios Vasileiadis;Lucrezia Lamastra

  • Groundwater pollution and quality monitoring approaches at the European level

    Matteo Balderacchi;Pierre Benoit;Philippe Cambier;Ole Martin Eklo

  • Effects of a humic acid and its size-fractions on the bacterial community of soil rhizosphere under maize (Zea mays L.).

    Edoardo Puglisi;George Fragoulis;Patrizia Ricciuti;Fabrizio Cappa

  • Characterization of mercury species in soils by HPLC-ICP-MS and measurement of fraction removed by diffusive gradient in thin films.

    I. Cattani;S. Spalla;G.M. Beone;A.A.M. Del Re

  • A calculation procedure to assess potential environmental risk of pesticides at the farm level

    Laura Padovani;Marco Trevisan;Ettore Capri

  • Pesticides in rainfall and air in Italy.

    M. Trevisan;C. Montepiani;L. Ragozza;C. Bartoletti

  • Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review

    Andrea Ferrarini;Paolo Serra;María Almagro;María Almagro;Marco Trevisan

  • Assessment of the impact of three pesticides on microbial dynamics and functions in a lab-to-field experimental approach.

    P.A. Karas;C. Baguelin;G. Pertile;E.S. Papadopoulou

  • Botanical and biological pesticides elicit a similar Induced Systemic Response in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) secondary metabolism.

    Luca Pretali;Letizia Bernardo;Timothy S. Butterfield;Marco Trevisan

  • A Component-Based Framework for Simulating Agricultural Production and Externalities

    Marcello Donatelli;Graham Russell;Andrea Emilio Rizzoli;Marco Acutis

  • Reduction of Point Contamination Sources of Pesticide from a Vineyard Farm

    Gabriella Fait;Marco Nicelli;George Fragoulis;Marco Trevisan

  • Assessing Potential for Movement of Active Substances and their Metabolites to Ground Water in the EU : Final Report of the Ground Water Work Group of FOCUS (FOrum for the Co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their USe)

    J.J.T.I. Boesten;R. Fischer;B. Gottesbüren;K. Hanze

Frequent Co-Authors

Flavia Navari-Izzo
Flavia Navari-Izzo University of Pisa
Roberto Pinton
Roberto Pinton University of Udine
Luigi Lucini
Luigi Lucini Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Zeno Varanini
Zeno Varanini University of Verona
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Colin D. Brown
Colin D. Brown University of York
Marnik Vanclooster
Marnik Vanclooster Université Catholique de Louvain
Paolo Nannipieri
Paolo Nannipieri University of Florence
Alessandro Piccolo
Alessandro Piccolo University of Naples Federico II
Adriano Marocco
Adriano Marocco Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career pathways. Programs such as online sociology bachelor programs provide foundational knowledge in social systems, which is crucial for understanding human-environment interactions.

Educators or professionals looking to enhance their leadership skills might consider online edd programs no dissertation. These programs offer advanced educational training with a streamlined approach, valuable for driving environmental education initiatives.

For deeper academic advancement, pathways like eds to edd programs allow educators to transition from a Doctor of Education to a Doctor of Education in Leadership, enhancing credentials in educational policy related to environmental science.

Additionally, professionals focused on social aspects of environmental change may find online dsw programs in social work beneficial. These programs prepare graduates to address community and social welfare challenges linked to environmental issues.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Trevisan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles