World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
68968
World Ranking
9061
National Ranking
355

Lisa Hartling publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Hartling sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 437 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lisa Hartling D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Hartling sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisa Hartling is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada and has contributed extensively to research within the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their work spans multiple subfields, notably General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Clinical Psychology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Hartling's publications encompass a variety of topics focused on evidence synthesis, pediatric pain, health policy, and health literacy. Core topics addressed in their research include:

  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Delphi Technique in Research

Among their recent papers are works published predominantly in well-regarded medical journals. Notable publications include:

  • "Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement" (2022) in BMJ
  • "Incidence, risk factors, natural history, and hypothesised mechanisms of myocarditis and pericarditis following covid-19 vaccination: living evidence syntheses and review" (2022) in BMJ
  • "Digital Technology Distraction for Acute Pain in Children: A Meta-analysis" (2020) in PEDIATRICS
  • "Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: a scoping review" (2020) in Systematic Reviews
  • "Screening for Gestational Diabetes" (2021) in JAMA

Hartling frequently collaborates with a group of researchers, reflecting sustained partnerships in their scholarly work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Shannon D. Scott
  • Jennifer Pillay
  • Ben Vandermeer
  • Sarah A. Elliott
  • Samina Ali

Their research has appeared in a range of publication venues, with the highest number of contributions in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Systematic Reviews
  • Paediatrics & Child Health
  • PLoS ONE
  • JMIR Formative Research

Best Publications

  • PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

    Andrea C Tricco;Erin Lillie;Wasifa Zarin;Kelly K O'Brien

  • Meta-Analysis: Secondary Prevention Programs for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

    Alexander M. Clark;Lisa Hartling;Ben Vandermeer;Finlay A. McAlister

  • Efficacy and safety of exogenous melatonin for secondary sleep disorders and sleep disorders accompanying sleep restriction: meta-analysis

    Nina Buscemi;Ben Vandermeer;Nicola Hooton;Rena Pandya

  • Standard 6: Age Groups for Pediatric Trials

    Katrina Williams;Denise Thomson;Iva Seto;Despina G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis

  • Behavioural and developmental interventions for autism spectrum disorder: a clinical systematic review.

    Maria B. Ospina;Jennifer Krebs Seida;Brenda Clark;Mohammad Karkhaneh

  • Epinephrine for bronchiolitis.

    Lisa Hartling;Liza M Bialy;Ben Vandermeer;Lisa Tjosvold

  • Prevalence and Effect of Cyberbullying on Children and Young People: A Scoping Review of Social Media Studies

    Michele P. Hamm;Amanda S. Newton;Annabritt Chisholm;Jocelyn Shulhan

  • The efficacy and safety of exogenous melatonin for primary sleep disorders. A meta-analysis.

    Nina Buscemi;Ben Vandermeer;Nicola Hooton;Rena Pandya

  • Systematic Review: Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients with Symptomatic Heart Failure

    Finlay A. McAlister;Justin A. Ezekowitz;Natasha Wiebe;Brian Rowe

  • Music for pain and anxiety in children undergoing medical procedures: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

    J.A. Klassen;Y. Liang;L. Tjosvold;T.P. Klassen

  • Glucocorticoids for acute viral bronchiolitis in infants and young children.

    Ricardo M Fernandes;Liza M Bialy;Ben Vandermeer;Lisa Tjosvold

  • Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews

    Nina Buscemi;Lisa Hartling;Ben Vandermeer;Lisa Tjosvold

  • Benefits and Harms of Treating Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research

    Lisa Hartling;Donna M Dryden;Alyssa Guthrie;Melanie Muise

  • Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study.

    Lisa Hartling;Maria Ospina;Yuanyuan Liang;Donna M Dryden

  • Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers

    Lisa Hartling;Andrea Milne;Michele P. Hamm;Ben Vandermeer

  • Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions

    Shannon D Scott;Lauren Albrecht;Kathy O'Leary;Geoff D C Ball

  • Social media use among patients and caregivers: a scoping review

    Michele P Hamm;Annabritt Chisholm;Jocelyn Shulhan;Andrea Milne

  • The effectiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME Guide No. 30

    Mim Fatmi;Lisa Hartling;Tracey Hillier;Sandra Campbell

  • Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions

    Meera Viswanathan;Mohammed T Ansari;Nancy D Berkman;Stephanie Chang

  • Problem-based learning in pre-clinical medical education: 22 years of outcome research

    Lisa Hartling;Carol Spooner;Lisa Tjosvold;Anna Oswald

Frequent Co-Authors

Terry P. Klassen
Terry P. Klassen University of Manitoba
Katrina Williams
Katrina Williams University of Melbourne
Brian H. Rowe
Brian H. Rowe University of Alberta
Andrea C. Tricco
Andrea C. Tricco St. Michael's Hospital
Finlay A. McAlister
Finlay A. McAlister University of Alberta
Patrick J. McGrath
Patrick J. McGrath Columbia University
Lehana Thabane
Lehana Thabane McMaster University
Joan Robinson
Joan Robinson University of Alberta
William Pickett
William Pickett Brock University
Phillip I. Tarr
Phillip I. Tarr Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in healthcare but looking for alternative educational routes beyond traditional medical school, there are several flexible online options to consider. For aspiring nurses, online adn programs (Associate Degree in Nursing) offer a pathway to nursing that often takes less time and can be more accessible. Some institutions are also recognized as a nursing school that don't require teas, which means you can skip standardized entrance exams like TEAS or HESI that can be barriers for some students.

For those with a non-nursing background aiming to move quickly into advanced practice, online direct entry msn programs provide a streamlined route to a Master of Science in Nursing and the chance to shift careers efficiently. Alternatively, if you are more interested in healthcare administration, there are medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid, making this administrative track both accessible and affordable.

Each of these pathways offers the advantages of flexible online study, diverse career options, and the ability to enter the healthcare field without the lengthy commitment of a standard medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa Hartling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles