World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
34900
World Ranking
13481
National Ranking
6854

Daniel Talmor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Talmor sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 337 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel Talmor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Talmor sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Talmor is affiliated with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, focusing primarily on pulmonary and respiratory medicine as well as critical care and intensive care medicine. Their research encompasses various subfields including anesthesiology and pain medicine, epidemiology, and emergency medicine.

Their work covers significant topics within respiratory support and mechanisms, with particular attention to intensive care unit cognitive disorders, sepsis diagnosis and treatment, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, airway management and intubation techniques, neonatal respiratory health research, and the long-term effects of COVID-19.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Daniel Talmor include:

  • Maximilian S. Schaefer
  • Valerie Banner-Goodspeed
  • Elias Baedorf-Kassis
  • Aiman Suleiman
  • Hunter B. Moore

Publications are often found in the following venues:

  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Critical Care
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Journal of Critical Care
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Recent papers published by Daniel Talmor include:

  • The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline (2020) in Intensive Care Medicine
  • Early Restrictive or Liberal Fluid Management for Sepsis-Induced Hypotension (2023) in New England Journal of Medicine
  • Lung Recruitment Assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography (RECRUIT): A Multicenter Study of COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (2023) in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities 2023 (2024) in Critical Care Medicine
  • Mechanical Power during General Anesthesia and Postoperative Respiratory Failure: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study (2022) in Anesthesiology

Best Publications

  • Driving Pressure and Survival in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Marcelo B.P. Amato;Maureen O. Meade;Arthur S. Slutsky;Laurent Brochard

  • Higher vs Lower Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Patients With Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Matthias Briel;Maureen Meade;Alain Mercat;Roy G. Brower

  • An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Eddy Fan;Lorenzo Del Sorbo;Ewan C. Goligher;Carol L. Hodgson

  • Intensive insulin therapy and mortality among critically ill patients: a meta-analysis including NICE-SUGAR study data

    Donald E.G. Griesdale;Russell J. de Souza;Rob M. van Dam;Daren K. Heyland

  • Mechanical Ventilation Guided by Esophageal Pressure in Acute Lung Injury

    Daniel Talmor;Todd Sarge;Atul Malhotra;Carl R O'Donnell

  • Serum Lactate as a Predictor of Mortality in Emergency Department Patients with Infection

    Nathan I. Shapiro;Michael D. Howell;Daniel Talmor;Larry A. Nathanson

  • Early, goal-directed mobilisation in the surgical intensive care unit: a randomised controlled trial

    Stefan J Schaller;Matthew Anstey;Manfred Blobner;Thomas Edrich

  • Early identification of patients at risk of acute lung injury: Evaluation of lung injury prediction score in a multicenter cohort study

    Ognjen Gajic;Ousama Dabbagh;Pauline K. Park;Adebola Adesanya

  • Iatrogenic Gastric Acid Suppression and the Risk of Nosocomial Clostridium difficile Infection

    Michael D. Howell;Victor Novack;Philip Grgurich;Diane Soulliard

  • The application of esophageal pressure measurement in patients with respiratory failure.

    E Akoumianaki;Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore;F Valenza;G Bellani

  • Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.

    Ary Serpa Neto;Sabrine N.T. Hemmes;Carmen S.V. Barbas;Martin Beiderlinden

  • International Evidence-Based Recommendations for Focused Cardiac Ultrasound

    Gabriele Via;Arif Hussain;Mike Wells;Robert Reardon

  • Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol.

    Nathan I. Shapiro;Michael D. Howell;Daniel Talmor;Dermot Lahey

  • Occult hypoperfusion and mortality in patients with suspected infection.

    Michael D. Howell;Michael Donnino;Peter Clardy;Daniel Talmor

  • Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives

    Tommaso Mauri;Takeshi Yoshida;Takeshi Yoshida;Giacomo Bellani;Ewan C. Goligher;Ewan C. Goligher

  • International expert statement on training standards for critical care ultrasonography

    BP Cholley;PH Mayo;J Poelaert;A Vieillard-Baron

  • Hospital Incidence and Outcomes of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using the Kigali Modification of the Berlin Definition

    Elisabeth D Riviello;Willy Kiviri;Theogene Twagirumugabe;Ariel Mueller

  • Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Bedside General and Cardiac Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Critically Ill Patients—part Ii: Cardiac Ultrasonography

    Alexander Levitov;Heidi L. Frankel;Michael Blaivas;Andrew W. Kirkpatrick

  • Effect of Titrating Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) With an Esophageal Pressure-Guided Strategy vs an Empirical High PEEP-Fio2 Strategy on Death and Days Free From Mechanical Ventilation Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Jeremy R. Beitler;Todd Sarge;Valerie M. Banner-Goodspeed;Michelle N. Gong

  • Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis

    Ary Serpa Neto;Ary Serpa Neto;Sabrine N.T. Hemmes;Carmen S.V. Barbas;Martin Beiderlinden

Frequent Co-Authors

Atul Malhotra
Atul Malhotra University of California, San Diego
Nathan I. Shapiro
Nathan I. Shapiro Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Ognjen Gajic
Ognjen Gajic Mayo Clinic
Antonio Pesenti
Antonio Pesenti University of Milan
B. Taylor Thompson
B. Taylor Thompson Harvard University
Neill K. J. Adhikari
Neill K. J. Adhikari University of Toronto
Arthur S. Slutsky
Arthur S. Slutsky University of Toronto
Luciano Gattinoni
Luciano Gattinoni University of Göttingen
Marcus J. Schultz
Marcus J. Schultz University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA can open doors to several related online degree programs and career paths. For those interested in the business and leadership side of healthcare, pursuing a health care administration degree online can be an excellent choice. This path prepares students for healthcare management roles, with flexible learning options suited to busy schedules.

Nurses aiming to advance their education and clinical expertise may consider adn to np bridge programs, which provide a streamlined approach for registered nurses to become nurse practitioners through online study.

For those passionate about nutrition and wellness, earning a nutrition degree online offers a pathway into areas like dietetics, sports nutrition, or public health.

Additionally, future healthcare leaders can seek out cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs, which ensure quality standards and are highly valued by employers. Each of these options supports career growth in complementary health fields while providing the flexibility of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Talmor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles