World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
39602
World Ranking
16891
National Ranking
8471

John J. Marini publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. Marini sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 411 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John J. Marini D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John J. Marini sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John J. Marini is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a strong focus on pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields, including emergency medicine, critical care and intensive care medicine, biomedical engineering, and epidemiology.

Their publications emphasize respiratory support mechanisms, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, neonatal respiratory health, mechanical circulatory support devices, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) research, intensive care unit cognitive disorders, and sepsis diagnosis and treatment.

Recent papers authored by John J. Marini include:

  • Management of COVID-19 Respiratory Distress, 2020, JAMA
  • Prone Position in ARDS Patients: Why, When, How and for Whom, 2020, Intensive Care Medicine
  • Physiological and Quantitative CT-Scan Characterization of COVID-19 and Typical ARDS: A Matched Cohort Study, 2020, Intensive Care Medicine
  • Personalized Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, 2021, Critical Care
  • COVID-19 Pneumonia: Pathophysiology and Management, 2021, European Respiratory Review

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Marini include Luciano Gattinoni, Luigi Camporota, Mattia Busana, Patrícia R. M. Rocco, and Federica Romitti.

Marini's research has been published primarily in the following venues:

  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Critical Care
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Respiratory Care

Best Publications

  • Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

    Andrew Rhodes;Laura E. Evans;Waleed Alhazzani;Mitchell M. Levy

  • Management of COVID-19 Respiratory Distress.

    John J. Marini;Luciano Gattinoni

  • Occult positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with airflow obstruction: the auto-PEEP effect.

    P. E. Pepe;John J Marini

  • Lung Stress and Strain during Mechanical Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Davide Chiumello;Eleonora Carlesso;Paolo Cadringher;Pietro Caironi

  • Recruitment and derecruitment during acute respiratory failure: an experimental study.

    Paolo Pelosi;Mari Goldner;Andrew McKIBBEN;Alex Adams

  • The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS, part 2: Ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling. Acute respiratory distress syndrome.

    Antonio Artigas;Gordon R. Bernard;Jean Carlet;Didier Dreyfuss

  • Recruitment and derecruitment during acute respiratory failure: a clinical study.

    Stefania Crotti;Daniele Mascheroni;Pietro Caironi;Paolo Pelosi

  • Prone Position in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Rationale, Indications, and Limits

    Luciano Gattinoni;Paolo Taccone;Eleonora Carlesso;John J. Marini

  • The inspiratory workload of patient-initiated mechanical ventilation

    J J Marini;R M Rodriguez;V Lamb

  • The Inspiratory Work of Breathing During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation

    J. J. Marini;J. S. Capps;B. H. Culver

  • Prone positioning attenuates and redistributes ventilator-induced lung injury in dogs.

    Alain Broccard;Robert S. Shapiro;Laura L. Schmitz;Alex B. Adams

  • Prone position in ARDS patients: why, when, how and for whom.

    Claude Guérin;Claude Guérin;Richard K. Albert;Jeremy R. Beitler;Luciano Gattinoni

  • Effect of mechanical ventilation strategy on dissemination of intratracheally instilled Escherichia coli in dogs

    Avi Nahum;James Hoyt;Laura Schmitz;Julia Moody

  • Recruitment maneuvers in three experimental models of acute lung injury. Effect on lung volume and gas exchange.

    Thomas E. Van Der Kloot;Lluis Blanch;Lluis Blanch;A. Melynne Youngblood;A. Melynne Youngblood;Craig R Weinert

  • In vitro versus in vivo comparison of endotracheal tube airflow resistance.

    Patrick E. Wright;John J. Marini;Gordon R. Bernard

  • Diaphragm ultrasound as indicator of respiratory effort in critically ill patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation: a pilot clinical study

    Michele Umbrello;Paolo Formenti;Daniela Longhi;Andrea Galimberti

  • Experts’ opinion on management of hemodynamics in ARDS patients: focus on the effects of mechanical ventilation

    A. Vieillard-Baron;A. Vieillard-Baron;M. Matthay;J. L. Teboul;T. Bein

  • Effects of decreased respiratory frequency on ventilator-induced lung injury.

    John R. Hotchkiss;Lluis Blanch;Gaston Murias;Alexander B. Adams

  • Influence of prone position on the extent and distribution of lung injury in a high tidal volume oleic acid model of acute respiratory distress syndrome

    Alain F. Broccard;Robert S. Shapiro;Laura L. Schmitz;Sue A. Ravenscraft

  • Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008 (Intensive Care Medicine (2008) 34, (17-60))

    R. Phillip Dellinger;Mitchell M. Levy;Jean M. Carlet;Julian Bion

Frequent Co-Authors

Luciano Gattinoni
Luciano Gattinoni University of Göttingen
Paolo Pelosi
Paolo Pelosi University of Genoa
Jean Louis Vincent
Jean Louis Vincent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Davide Chiumello
Davide Chiumello University of Milan
Antonio Pesenti
Antonio Pesenti University of Milan
Mervyn Singer
Mervyn Singer University College London
Gordon R. Bernard
Gordon R. Bernard Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Mitchell M. Levy
Mitchell M. Levy Brown University
Marcus J. Schultz
Marcus J. Schultz University of Amsterdam
Arthur S. Slutsky
Arthur S. Slutsky University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering Medicine in the USA, online degrees in nursing and health sciences can be valuable career pathways or stepping stones. Many prospective healthcare professionals look for flexibility in their education, so accredited online programs are increasingly popular.

For registered nurses aiming to advance, online rn-bsn programs without clinicals offer a way to earn a bachelor's degree without the traditional clinical requirements, making it easier to study while working. Likewise, practical nurses interested in upskilling quickly may prefer a 6 month lpn program, allowing eligibility for nursing licensure in a significantly shorter time.

For advanced practice roles, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs can be completed efficiently. If speed is critical, check out the fastest dnp program options. Budget is also a concern for many; exploring the cheapest dnp program can help you plan your academic journey without unnecessary financial strain.

Exploring these online pathways can provide flexible, affordable, and fast-tracked routes to a rewarding healthcare career—whether as a nurse or a future physician.

Best Scientists Citing John J. Marini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles