World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
74
Citations
21805
World Ranking
5546
National Ranking
2635

Benjamin S. Glick publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin S. Glick sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 158 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Benjamin S. Glick D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin S. Glick sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Benjamin S. Glick is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a distinct emphasis on Cell Biology and Molecular Biology. Additional areas of study include Biophysics, Organic Chemistry, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The researcher's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Cellular transport and secretion
  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Click Chemistry and Applications
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Benjamin S. Glick has published frequently in venues such as BioEssays and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), with additional contributions to eLife, The Journal of Cell Biology, and Molecular Biology of the Cell.

Recent publications include:

  • "A General Method to Improve Fluorophores Using Deuterated Auxochromes," 2021, JACS Au
  • "A photostable monomeric superfolder green fluorescent protein," 2020, Traffic
  • "Activity-dependent Golgi satellite formation in dendrites reshapes the neuronal surface glycoproteome," 2021, eLife
  • "A microscopy-based kinetic analysis of yeast vacuolar protein sorting," 2020, eLife
  • "ER arrival sites associate with ER exit sites to create bidirectional transport portals," 2020, The Journal of Cell Biology

Collaborations have included frequent co-authorship with Jason C. Casler, Luís Aragón, Mohan Babu, Ronald Berezney, and Hannah Correia.

Best Publications

  • The Mechanisms of Vesicle Budding and Fusion

    Juan S Bonifacino;Benjamin S Glick

  • Import of proteins into mitochondria.

    Benjamin Glick;Gottfried Schatz

  • Rapidly maturing variants of the Discosoma red fluorescent protein (DsRed).

    Brooke J Bevis;Benjamin S Glick

  • Purification of an N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive protein catalyzing vesicular transport.

    Marc R. Block;Benjamin S. Glick;Celeste A. Wilcox;Felix T. Wieland

  • A new type of coated vesicular carrier that appears not to contain clathrin: Its possible role in protein transport within the Golgi stack

    Lelio Orci;Benjamin S. Glick;James E. Rothman

  • Involvement of GTP-binding “G” proteins in transport through the Golgi stack

    Paul Melançon;Benjamin S. Glick;Vivek Malhotra;Peggy J. Weidman

  • Golgi maturation visualized in living yeast

    Eugene Losev;Catherine A. Reinke;Jennifer Jellen;Daniel E. Strongin

  • Role of an N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive transport component in promoting fusion of transport vesicles with cisternae of the Golgi stack

    Vivek Malhotra;Lelio Orci;Benjamin S. Glick;Marc R. Block

  • Cytochromes c1 and b2 are sorted to the intermembrane space of yeast mitochondria by a stop-transfer mechanism.

    Benjamin S. Glick;Anders Brandt;Kyle Cunningham;Sabina Müller

  • Golgi Structure Correlates with Transitional Endoplasmic Reticulum Organization in Pichia pastoris and Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Olivia W. Rossanese;Jon Soderholm;Brooke J. Bevis;Irina B. Sears

  • Isolation of highly purified mitochondria from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    Benjamin S. Glick;Liza A. Pon

  • Membrane Traffic Within the Golgi Apparatus

    Benjamin S. Glick;Akihiko Nakano

  • Possible Role for Fatty Acyl-Coenzyme A in Intracellular Protein Transport

    Benjamin S. Glick;James E. Rothman

  • Vesicular transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi stack requires the NEM-sensitive fusion protein.

    Con J. M. Beckers;Marc R. Block;Marc R. Block;Marc R. Block;Benjamin S. Glick;Benjamin S. Glick;James E. Rothman

  • CAN HSP70 PROTEINS ACT AS FORCE-GENERATING MOTORS ?

    Benjamin S Glick

  • Dynamics of Transitional Endoplasmic Reticulum Sites in Vertebrate Cells

    Adam T. Hammond;Benjamin S. Glick

  • The curious status of the Golgi apparatus.

    Benjamin S Glick;Vivek Malhotra

  • Sequential intermediates in the pathway of intercompartmental transport in a cell-free system

    William E. Balch;Benjamin S. Glick;James E. Rothman

  • De novo formation of transitional ER sites and Golgi structures in Pichia pastoris

    Brooke J Bevis;Adam T Hammond;Catherine A Reinke;Benjamin S Glick

  • Models for Golgi Traffic: A Critical Assessment

    Benjamin S. Glick;Alberto Luini

Frequent Co-Authors

Gottfried Schatz
Gottfried Schatz University of Basel
James E. Rothman
James E. Rothman Yale University
Robert J. Keenan
Robert J. Keenan University of Chicago
William N. Green
William N. Green University of Chicago
Vivek Malhotra
Vivek Malhotra Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Sabine Rospert
Sabine Rospert University of Freiburg
Lelio Orci
Lelio Orci University of Geneva
Andreas T Matouschek
Andreas T Matouschek The University of Texas at Austin
Suzanne R. Pfeffer
Suzanne R. Pfeffer Stanford University
Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz
Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz Howard Hughes Medical Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an education in Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to a wide variety of advanced and specialized online degree options. If you are interested in nursing leadership roles, exploring the best online dnp programs can help you advance your clinical expertise without the traditional on-site requirements.

For those drawn to healthcare administration or hospital management, a doctorate in healthcare management provides online pathways to leadership and policy-making positions. Alternatively, students interested in pharmaceuticals may consider the flexibility and career outcomes offered by online pharmd programs, which combine scientific knowledge with pharmacy practice.

Additionally, if your focus is on physiology, wellness, or human performance, an exercise science degree online accredited program offers have an excellent foundation for careers in health coaching, therapy, and sports science.

Each of these online degrees can supplement your background in Biology or Biochemistry and create diverse opportunities in research, healthcare, and industry. Careful research into accredited programs will ensure you align your studies with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin S. Glick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles