World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ognjen Gajic

Ognjen Gajic

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10483 9843 5394 4984 826 32641

Ognjen Gajic publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ognjen Gajic between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ognjen Gajic published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 29.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 63 publications in 2021. 45 of the 796 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 63. Peak 63 publications in 2021. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 29 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 54 publications 2010: 36 publications 2011: 61 publications 2012: 52 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 52 publications 2016: 41 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 40 publications 2019: 44 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 63 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 18 publications
1999 2025

796 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ognjen Gajic: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 4
2001 3
2002 1
2003 4
2004 9
2005 20
2006 29
2007 33
2008 32
2009 54
2010 36
2011 61
2012 52
2013 24
2014 24
2015 52
2016 41
2017 31
2018 40
2019 44
2020 34
2021 63
2022 32
2023 27
2024 27
2025 18
Total 796
Download as CSV

Ognjen Gajic publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ognjen Gajic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 821–840 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 826 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186 826
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ognjen Gajic D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ognjen Gajic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ognjen Gajic is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, specifically focusing on critical care and respiratory illnesses. Their research spans multiple subfields, including epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, infectious diseases, emergency medicine, and critical care and intensive care medicine.

The main topics of Gajic's research work include:

  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Gajic has published numerous papers, with notable recent publications including:

  • Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method, 2021, Critical Care
  • The Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS): An International Registry of Coronavirus 2019-Related Critical Illness, 2020, Critical Care Explorations
  • Guiding Principles for the Conduct of Observational Critical Care Research for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemics and Beyond: The Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study Registry, 2020, Critical Care Medicine
  • Variation in Early Management Practices in Moderate-to-Severe ARDS in the United States, 2021, CHEST Journal
  • Development and Verification of a Digital Twin Patient Model to Predict Specific Treatment Response During the First 24 Hours of Sepsis, 2020, Critical Care Explorations

Frequent co-authors working alongside Gajic include:

  • Rahul Kashyap
  • Allan J. Walkey
  • Amos Lal
  • Vishakha K. Kumar
  • Aysun Tekin

Among the preferred venues for Gajic's publications are:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • CHEST Journal
  • Critical Care Explorations
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings
  • Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

Gajic's work primarily supports advancements in the understanding and treatment of critical care conditions, especially those related to respiratory illnesses and sepsis. The focus on COVID-19 research also reflects a recent engagement with pandemic-related clinical challenges, emphasizing observational study principles and patient management strategies in intensive care settings.

Best Publications

  • An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Eddy Fan;Lorenzo Del Sorbo;Ewan C. Goligher;Carol L. Hodgson

  • Ventilator-associated lung injury in patients without acute lung injury at the onset of mechanical ventilation.

    Ognjen Gajic;Saqib I. Dara;Jose L. Mendez;Adebola O. Adesanya

  • Transfusion-related acute lung injury: Incidence and risk factors

    Pearl Toy;Ognjen Gajic;Peter Bacchetti;Mark R. Looney

  • Early identification of patients at risk of acute lung injury: Evaluation of lung injury prediction score in a multicenter cohort study

    Ognjen Gajic;Ousama Dabbagh;Pauline K. Park;Adebola Adesanya

  • The Importance of Fluid Management in Acute Lung Injury Secondary to Septic Shock

    Claire V. Murphy;Garrett E. Schramm;Joshua A. Doherty;Richard M. Reichley

  • Transfusion-related Acute Lung Injury in the Critically Ill: Prospective Nested Case-Control Study

    Ognjen Gajic;Rimki Rana;Jeffrey L. Winters;Murat Yilmaz

  • Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.

    Ary Serpa Neto;Sabrine N.T. Hemmes;Carmen S.V. Barbas;Martin Beiderlinden

  • Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients

    Ognjen Gajic;Fernando Frutos-Vivar;André Esteban;Rolf D. Hubmayr

  • Fresh-Frozen Plasma and Platelet Transfusions Are Associated With Development of Acute Lung Injury in Critically Ill Medical Patients

    Hasrat Khan;Jon Belsher;Murat Yilmaz;Bekele Afessa

  • Fluid overload in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated with early goal-directed therapy is associated with increased acute need for fluid-related medical interventions and hospital death

    Diana J. Kelm;Jared T. Perrin;Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba;Ognjen Gajic

  • What tidal volumes should be used in patients without acute lung injury

    Marcus J. Schultz;Jack J. Haitsma;Arthur S. Slutsky;Ognjen Gajic

  • Eight-year trend of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

    Guangxi Li;Michael Malinchoc;Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba;Chakradhar V. Venkata

  • Intraoperative Tidal Volume as a Risk Factor for Respiratory Failure after Pneumonectomy

    Evans R. Fernández-Pérez;Mark T. Keegan;Daniel R. Brown;Rolf D. Hubmayr

  • Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis

    Ary Serpa Neto;Ary Serpa Neto;Sabrine N.T. Hemmes;Carmen S.V. Barbas;Martin Beiderlinden

  • Beyond Mortality: Future Clinical Research in Acute Lung Injury

    Roger G. Spragg;Gordon R. Bernard;William Checkley;J. Randall Curtis

  • The effects of the alveolar recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on arterial oxygenation during laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

    Francis X. Whalen;Ognjen Gajic;Geoffrey B. Thompson;Michael L. Kendrick

  • Effect of 24-hour mandatory versus on-demand critical care specialist presence on quality of care and family and provider satisfaction in the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital.

    Ognjen Gajic;Bekele Afessa;Andrew C. Hanson;Tami Krpata

  • A comparison of three methods to estimate baseline creatinine for RIFLE classification

    Jakub Zavada;Jakub Zavada;Eric A J Hoste;Eric A J Hoste;Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba;Paolo Calzavacca

  • Lung-Protective Ventilation With Low Tidal Volumes and the Occurrence of Pulmonary Complications in Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Analysis.

    Ary Serpa Neto;Fabienne D. Simonis;Carmen S. V. Barbas;Michelle Biehl

  • Failure of non-invasive ventilation in patients with acute lung injury: observational cohort study.

    Sameer Rana;Hussam Jenad;Curtis F Buck

Frequent Co-Authors

Rolf D. Hubmayr
Rolf D. Hubmayr Mayo Clinic
Daniel Talmor
Daniel Talmor Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Marcus J. Schultz
Marcus J. Schultz University of Amsterdam
Michael A. Matthay
Michael A. Matthay University of California, San Francisco
David O. Warner
David O. Warner Mayo Clinic
Edward L. Murphy
Edward L. Murphy University of California, San Francisco
Rickey E. Carter
Rickey E. Carter Mayo Clinic
Paolo Pelosi
Paolo Pelosi University of Genoa
Paul J. Novotny
Paul J. Novotny Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but prefer alternative routes to traditional medical school, several online degrees and career pathways can help you break into the field. Many students choose related healthcare professions that offer flexibility, affordability, and quicker entry into the workforce.

For those fascinated by data and patient records, an online health information management degree provides skills in organizing and securing health data. If you are detail-oriented and seeking a fast track into healthcare, you might wonder how much does it cost to become a medical coder; online programs can make this option very accessible.

Aspiring nurses can choose between flexible, affordable online programs such as cheapest nurse practitioner programs, which allow registered nurses to advance their careers, or bridge programs like cheapest rn to bsn online that are designed for working professionals.

Exploring these pathways helps you find a healthcare career that matches your goals, schedule, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Ognjen Gajic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles