World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paul J. Novotny

Paul J. Novotny

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
39654
World Ranking
11138
National Ranking
5730

Paul J. Novotny publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Novotny sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 333 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul J. Novotny D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Novotny sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul J. Novotny is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on pulmonary and respiratory medicine, oncology, general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, as well as economics and econometrics.

Their research covers a diverse range of topics, including:

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Paul J. Novotny are:

  • Feasibility of a Health Coaching and Home-Based Rehabilitation Intervention With Remote Monitoring for COPD, 2021, Respiratory Care
  • Promoting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Wellness through Remote Monitoring and Health Coaching: A Clinical Trial, 2022, Annals of the American Thoracic Society
  • Club Fit: Development of a Physical Activity and Healthy Eating Intervention at a Boys & Girls Club After School Program, 2020, The Journal of Primary Prevention
  • Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE), 2020, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Longitudinal Toxicity over Time (ToxT) analysis to evaluate tolerability: a case study of lenalidomide in the CALGB 50401 (Alliance) trial, 2020, The Lancet Haematology

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Mark L. Wieland
  • Irene G. Sia
  • Amylou C. Dueck
  • Jeff A. Sloan
  • Matthew M. Clark

Paul J. Novotny's work has been published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Journal of the COPD Foundation
  • BMC Public Health

Their contributions span 69 publications within the general field of medicine, with particular depth in pulmonary and respiratory medicine and oncology. The range and interdisciplinary nature of their work encompass clinical interventions, patient-reported outcomes, health coaching, and rehabilitative efforts, often addressing chronic diseases and survivorship issues across diverse populations.

Best Publications

  • Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Ethan Basch;Allison M. Deal;Mark G. Kris;Howard I. Scher

  • Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons.

    Tait D. Shanafelt;Charles M. Balch;Gerald Bechamps;Tom Russell

  • Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: a prospective longitudinal study.

    Colin P. West;Mashele M. Huschka;Paul J. Novotny;Jeff A. Sloan

  • Burnout and suicidal ideation among U.S. medical students.

    Liselotte N. Dyrbye;Matthew R. Thomas;F. Stanford Massie;David V. Power

  • Burnout and career satisfaction among American surgeons.

    Tait D. Shanafelt;Charles M. Balch;Gerald J. Bechamps;Thomas Russell

  • Venlafaxine in management of hot flashes in survivors of breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial

    Charles L Loprinzi;John W Kugler;Jeff A Sloan;James A Mailliard

  • Special Report: Suicidal Ideation Among American Surgeons

    Tait D. Shanafelt;Charles M. Balch;Charles M. Balch;Lotte N. Dyrbye;Gerald Bechamps

  • Personal life events and medical student burnout: a multicenter study.

    Liselotte N. Dyrbye;Matthew R. Thomas;Jefrey L. Huntington;Jefrey L. Huntington;Karen L. Lawson

  • How Do Distress and Well-being Relate to Medical Student Empathy? A Multicenter Study

    Matthew R. Thomas;Liselotte N. Dyrbye;Jefrey L. Huntington;Karen L. Lawson

  • Career fit and burnout among academic faculty.

    Tait D Shanafelt;Colin Patrick West;Jeff A Sloan;Paul J. Novotny

  • Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation of painful metastases involving bone: a multicenter study.

    Matthew P. Goetz;Matthew R. Callstrom;J. William Charboneau;Michael A. Farrell

  • Methodologic lessons learned from hot flash studies.

    Jeff A. Sloan;Charles L. Loprinzi;Paul J. Novotny;Debra L. Barton

  • Phase III Evaluation of Fluoxetine for Treatment of Hot Flashes

    Charles L. Loprinzi;Jeff A. Sloan;Edith A. Perez;Susan K. Quella

  • Relationship between increased personal well-being and enhanced empathy among

    Tait D. Shanafelt;Colin West;Xinghua Zhao;Paul Novotny

  • The learning environment and medical student burnout: A multicentre study

    Liselotte N. Dyrbye;Matthew R. Thomas;William Harper;F. Stanford Massie

  • Dronabinol Versus Megestrol Acetate Versus Combination Therapy for Cancer-Associated Anorexia: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study

    Aminah Jatoi;Harold E. Windschitl;Charles L. Loprinzi;Jeff A. Sloan

  • Prospective evaluation of vitamin E for hot flashes in breast cancer survivors.

    Debra L. Barton;Charles L. Loprinzi;Susan K. Quella;Jeff A. Sloan

  • Evaluation of Soy Phytoestrogens for the Treatment of Hot Flashes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial

    Susan K. Quella;Charles L. Loprinzi;Debra L. Barton;James A. Knost

  • Relationship between increased personal well-being and enhanced empathy among internal medicine residents

    Tait D. Shanafelt;Colin West;Xinghua Zhao;Paul Novotny

  • Prospective evaluation of prognostic variables from patient-completed questionnaires. North Central Cancer Treatment Group.

    C L Loprinzi;J A Laurie;H S Wieand;J E Krook

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeff A. Sloan
Jeff A. Sloan Mayo Clinic
Tait D. Shanafelt
Tait D. Shanafelt Stanford University
Shaker R. Dakhil
Shaker R. Dakhil University of Kansas
Amylou C. Dueck
Amylou C. Dueck Mayo Clinic
Jan C. Buckner
Jan C. Buckner Mayo Clinic
Ping Yang
Ping Yang Mayo Clinic
David P. Steensma
David P. Steensma Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA offers diverse pathways, especially with the rise of flexible online programs. For registered nurses who wish to further their education, there are rn to bsn online programs without clinicals, making it easier to advance without the pressure of additional in-person requirements. These programs are ideal for working professionals seeking to upgrade their credentials while balancing work and life.

For those looking to achieve a terminal nursing degree faster, the fastest online dnp programs provide opportunities to complete studies in a shorter time frame. You may also want to explore various dnp programs online that offer different options in terms of flexibility, curriculum, and workload.

If you’re just starting out in nursing, lpn accelerated program options can quickly get you career-ready. Examining these career pathways is crucial for maximizing your professional opportunities and choosing a program that best fits your educational needs and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Paul J. Novotny

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles