World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Diethelm Wallwiener

Diethelm Wallwiener

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 77 18390 17278 969 930 885 22854

Diethelm Wallwiener publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Diethelm Wallwiener between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Diethelm Wallwiener published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 22.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 129 publications in 2014. 28 of the 999 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 129. Peak 129 publications in 2014. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 29 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 22 publications 1998: 18 publications 1999: 21 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 26 publications 2002: 21 publications 2003: 33 publications 2004: 55 publications 2005: 38 publications 2006: 52 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 34 publications 2009: 38 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 31 publications 2012: 39 publications 2013: 33 publications 2014: 129 publications 2015: 35 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 38 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 6 publications
1982 2025

999 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Diethelm Wallwiener: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 4
1989 7
1990 3
1991 3
1992 29
1993 4
1994 6
1995 7
1996 11
1997 22
1998 18
1999 21
2000 16
2001 26
2002 21
2003 33
2004 55
2005 38
2006 52
2007 33
2008 34
2009 38
2010 24
2011 31
2012 39
2013 33
2014 129
2015 35
2016 31
2017 22
2018 26
2019 25
2020 24
2021 16
2022 15
2023 38
2024 22
2025 6
Total 999
Download as CSV

Diethelm Wallwiener publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diethelm Wallwiener sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 881–900 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 885 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139 885
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Diethelm Wallwiener D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diethelm Wallwiener sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730 77
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Diethelm Wallwiener is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany and has an extensive research portfolio primarily in the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work encompasses a significant focus on oncology, with contributions covering various aspects of cancer research including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, genetics, and surgery.

The scientist's publication record includes numerous articles in peer-reviewed journals, with frequent contributions to leading venues such as Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, Senologie - Zeitschrift für Mammadiagnostik und -therapie, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, European Journal of Cancer, and Cancers.

Key research topics covered by Diethelm Wallwiener include:

  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Diethelm Wallwiener are:

  • Prognostic effect of low-level HER2 expression in patients with clinically negative HER2 status, 2021, European Journal of Cancer
  • Mutations in BRCA1/2 and Other Panel Genes in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer -Association With Patient and Disease Characteristics and Effect on Prognosis, 2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Living-Donor Uterus Transplantation: Pre-, Intra-, and Postoperative Parameters Relevant to Surgical Success, Pregnancy, and Obstetrics with Live Births, 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Efficacy of Lapatinib in Patients with HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer and HER2-Positive Circulating Tumor Cells-The DETECT III Clinical Trial, 2024, Clinical Chemistry
  • Initial experience with CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapies compared to antihormone monotherapies in routine clinical use in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer - Data from the PRAEGNANT research network for the first 2 years of drug availability in Germany, 2020, The Breast

Throughout their career, Diethelm Wallwiener has collaborated extensively with a group of frequent co-authors, including Sara Y. Brucker, Tanja Fehm, Andreas Schneeweiß, Peter A. Fasching, and Andreas D. Hartkopf. These collaborations have contributed to a substantial body of work primarily centered on breast cancer treatment and diagnostics.

Wallwiener's research spans both clinical studies and molecular investigations, with a particular emphasis on therapeutic approaches and diagnostic advancements in oncology. Their contributions cover the clinical outcomes of breast cancer therapies, mutations affecting prognosis, and surgical parameters relevant to transplantation and birth outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Reduction in New Metastases in Breast Cancer with Adjuvant Clodronate Treatment

    Ingo J. Diel;Erich-Franz Solomayer;Serban D. Costa;Christina Gollan

  • Clinical aspects of Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuester–Hauser syndrome: recommendations for clinical diagnosis and staging

    Peter Oppelt;Stefan P. Renner;Anja Kellermann;Sara Brucker

  • Detection and Typing of Human Papillomavirus by E6 Nested Multiplex PCR

    K. Sotlar;D. Diemer;A. Dethleffs;Y. Hack

  • HER2 status of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a prospective, multicenter trial

    Tanja Fehm;Volkmar Müller;Bahriye Aktas;Wolfgang Janni

  • Expression of stem cell and epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers in primary breast cancer patients with circulating tumor cells

    Sabine Kasimir-Bauer;Oliver Hoffmann;Diethelm Wallwiener;Rainer Kimmig

  • Proteomics of Human Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

    Julia D. Wulfkuhle;Dennis C. Sgroi;Henry Krutzsch;Kelley McLean;Kelley McLean

  • Progression-specific genes identified by expression profiling of matched ductal carcinomas in situ and invasive breast tumors, combining laser capture microdissection and oligonucleotide microarray analysis.

    Christina S. Schuetz;Michael Bonin;Susan E. Clare;Kay Nieselt

  • Detection and characterization of circulating tumor cells in blood of primary breast cancer patients by RT-PCR and comparison to status of bone marrow disseminated cells

    Tanja Fehm;Oliver Hoffmann;Bahriye Aktas;Sven Becker

  • The VCUAM (Vagina Cervix Uterus Adnex-associated Malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations.

    Peter Oppelt;Stefan P. Renner;Sara Brucker;Pamela L. Strissel

  • A concept for the standardized detection of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow from patients with primary breast cancer and its clinical implementation

    Tanja Fehm;Stephan Braun;Volkmar Muller;Wolfgang Janni

  • Higher efficacy of letrozole in combination with trastuzumab compared to letrozole monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer - results of the eLEcTRA trial.

    J. Huober;J. Huober;P.A. Fasching;P.A. Fasching;M. Barsoum;L. Petruzelka

  • Expression of the embryonic stem cell marker SOX2 in early-stage breast carcinoma

    Claudia Lengerke;Tanja Fehm;Ralf Kurth;Hans Neubauer

  • Determination of HER2 status using both serum HER2 levels and circulating tumor cells in patients with recurrent breast cancer whose primary tumor was HER2 negative or of unknown HER2 status

    Tanja Fehm;Sven Becker;Silke Duerr-Stoerzer;Karl Sotlar

  • High prevalence of viral genomes and inflammation in peripartum cardiomyopathy.

    Burkhard D. Bültmann;Karin Klingel;Michael Näbauer;Diethelm Wallwiener

  • Is human chorionic gonadotropin directly involved in the regulation of human implantation

    P. Licht;H. Fluhr;J. Neuwinger;D. Wallwiener

  • Measurement of tumour size with mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging as compared to histological tumour size in primary breast cancer

    Ines Gruber;Miriam Rueckert;Karl Oliver Kagan;Annette Staebler

  • Telomerase activity correlates with tumor aggressiveness and reflects therapy effect in breast cancer.

    Axel Hoos;Axel Hoos;Hedwig H. Hepp;Sepp Kaul;Thorsten Ahlert

  • PET with [18F]fluorothymidine for imaging of primary breast cancer: a pilot study

    Brigitte Smyczek-Gargya;Nikos Fersis;Helmut Dittmann;Ulrich Vogel

  • A concept for the clinical implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast carcinoma with special regard to quality assurance.

    Thorsten Kuehn;Andreas Bembenek;Thomas Decker;Dieter Ludwig Munz

  • Chemokine bioactivity of RANTES in endometriotic and normal endometrial stromal cells and peritoneal fluid.

    D. Hornung;F. Bentzien;D. Wallwiener;L. Kiesel

Frequent Co-Authors

Tanja Fehm
Tanja Fehm Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Andreas Schneeweiss
Andreas Schneeweiss German Cancer Research Center
Peter A. Fasching
Peter A. Fasching University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Matthias W. Beckmann
Matthias W. Beckmann University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Volkmar Müller
Volkmar Müller Universität Hamburg
Nadia Harbeck
Nadia Harbeck Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Michael Untch
Michael Untch Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch
Christoph Thomssen
Christoph Thomssen University of Göttingen
Jens Huober
Jens Huober Kantonsspital St. Gallen
Arnulf Stenzl
Arnulf Stenzl University of Tübingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in medical careers beyond traditional doctor routes? Many students considering studying Medicine in the USA also explore other respected healthcare pathways—and online options make these fields more accessible than ever.

For those drawn to pharmaceuticals, consider pursuing pharmacy school online, which allows you to continue working or meeting other obligations while earning a degree. Similarly, if managing health data interests you, accredited him programs offer a flexible route to careers in data management, compliance, and informatics.

Medical billing and coding is another respected field, and understanding medical coding certification cost can help you budget for one of the fastest-growing allied health careers. Nursing remains an ever-popular healthcare path, with numerous cheapest fnp programs online letting you prepare for advanced practice roles affordably.

Exploring these alternative degrees can expand your career options, allow greater work-life balance, and help you find a healthcare role that best matches your strengths and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Diethelm Wallwiener

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles