World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
66
Citations
13765
World Ranking
8786
National Ranking
3928

Robert C. Piper publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert C. Piper sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 134 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Robert C. Piper D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert C. Piper sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert C. Piper is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology as well as Medicine.

Their work spans several subfields including Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, and Neurology. The main research topics include:

  • Cellular transport and secretion
  • Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors

Some of the recent papers by Robert C. Piper highlight their focus on molecular mechanisms and cellular pathways. Notable publications include:

  • Functional Genomic Screening Independently Identifies CUL3 as a Mediator of Vemurafenib Resistance via Src-Rac1 Signaling Axis, 2020, Frontiers in Oncology
  • A Cycle of Ubiquitination Regulates Adaptor Function of the Nedd4-Family Ubiquitin Ligase Rsp5, 2020, Current Biology
  • Selective endocytosis of Ca 2+ -permeable AMPARs by the Alzheimer's disease risk factor CALM bidirectionally controls synaptic plasticity, 2022, Science Advances
  • Bro1 stimulates Vps4 to promote intralumenal vesicle formation during multivesicular body biogenesis, 2021, The Journal of Cell Biology
  • Dynein-Mediated Trafficking: A New Mechanism of Diabetic Podocytopathy, 2022, Kidney360

Robert C. Piper frequently collaborates with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Natalya Pashkova
  • Tabitha A. Peterson
  • Stanley C. Winistorfer
  • Christopher P. Ptak
  • Christopher A. Ahern

Their publications appear in several scientific venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Journal of Cell Biology
  • Brain
  • Frontiers in Oncology
  • Current Biology

Best Publications

  • Parasite Lactate Dehydrogenase as an Assay for Plasmodium falciparum Drug Sensitivity

    M. T. Makler;J. M. Ries;J. A. Williams;J. E. Bancroft

  • Biogenesis and Function of Multivesicular Bodies

    Robert C. Piper;David J. Katzmann

  • VPS27 controls vacuolar and endocytic traffic through a prevacuolar compartment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    Robert C. Piper;Antony A. Cooper;Hong Yang;Tom H. Stevens

  • The Vps27p Hse1p complex binds ubiquitin and mediates endosomal protein sorting.

    Patricia S. Bilodeau;Jennifer L. Urbanowski;Stanley C. Winistorfer;Robert C. Piper

  • Lysosome-endosome fusion and lysosome biogenesis.

    J.P. Luzio;B.A. Rous;N.A. Bright;P.R. Pryor

  • Svp1p defines a family of phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate effectors

    Stephen K Dove;Robert C Piper;Robert K McEwen;Jong W Yu

  • Immunocapture diagnostic assays for malaria using Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH).

    Robert Piper;Jacques Lebras;Laura Wentworth;Angela Hunt-Cooke

  • Insights into Ubiquitin Transfer Cascades from a Structure of a UbcH5B∼Ubiquitin-HECTNEDD4L Complex

    Hari B. Kamadurai;Judith Souphron;Daniel C. Scott;David M. Duda

  • Combinatorial SNARE complexes with VAMP7 or VAMP8 define different late endocytic fusion events.

    Paul R Pryor;Barbara M Mullock;Nicholas A Bright;Margaret R Lindsay

  • Differential sorting of two glucose transporters expressed in insulin-sensitive cells.

    R. C. Piper;L. J. Hess;D. E. James

  • Late endosomes: sorting and partitioning in multivesicular bodies.

    Robert C. Piper;J. Paul Luzio

  • Ubiquitin-Dependent Sorting in Endocytosis

    Robert C. Piper;Ivan Dikic;Gergely L. Lukacs

  • Loss of Vac14, a regulator of the signaling lipid phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate, results in neurodegeneration in mice

    Yanling Zhang;Sergey N. Zolov;Clement Y. Chow;Shalom G. Slutsky

  • Vps27-Hse1 and ESCRT-I complexes cooperate to increase efficiency of sorting ubiquitinated proteins at the endosome

    Patricia S. Bilodeau;Stanley C. Winistorfer;William R. Kearney;Andrew D. Robertson

  • The iron transporter Fth1p forms a complex with the Fet5 iron oxidase and resides on the vacuolar membrane.

    Jennifer L. Urbanowski;Robert C. Piper

  • How Ubiquitin Functions with ESCRTs

    S. Brookhart Shields;Robert C. Piper

  • Membrane dynamics and the biogenesis of lysosomes (Review)

    J Paul Luzio;Viviane Poupon;Margaret R Lindsay;Barbara M Mullock

  • Ubiquitin-dependent sorting of integral membrane proteins for degradation in lysosomes

    Robert C Piper;J Paul Luzio

  • GGA proteins bind ubiquitin to facilitate sorting at the trans-Golgi network

    Patricia M. Scott;Patricia S. Bilodeau;Olga Zhdankina;Stanley C. Winistorfer

  • The membrane protein alkaline phosphatase is delivered to the vacuole by a route that is distinct from the VPS-dependent pathway

    Robert C. Piper;Nia J. Bryant;Tom H. Stevens

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. James
David E. James University of Sydney
J. Paul Luzio
J. Paul Luzio University of Cambridge
Jan W. Slot
Jan W. Slot Utrecht University
Nicholas A. Bright
Nicholas A. Bright University of Cambridge
Tom H. Stevens
Tom H. Stevens University of Oregon
Peng Xu
Peng Xu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Brenda A. Schulman
Brenda A. Schulman Max Planck Society
Todd R. Graham
Todd R. Graham Vanderbilt University
John C. Lawrence
John C. Lawrence University of Virginia
Wilbur K. Milhous
Wilbur K. Milhous Clemson University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to a wide variety of dynamic and rewarding online degree options. For students interested in leadership roles, a degree in healthcare management offers a fast track into hospital administration and health systems leadership.

If you are passionate about mental health, consider exploring psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner programs online. These programs allow science graduates to specialize in advanced psychiatric care, often building on their biological science foundation.

Nutrition is another pathway closely linked to biochemistry. Accelerated online options like accelerated nutrition degree online make it easier to earn credentials and enter the nutrition and wellness sector.

For those looking to balance affordability with career growth, pursuing a cheap online mba healthcare administration can be an excellent strategy to boost your qualifications and expand your career opportunities in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Robert C. Piper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles