World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Finlay A. McAlister

Finlay A. McAlister

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
116
Citations
55292
World Ranking
4321
National Ranking
168

Finlay A. McAlister publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Finlay A. McAlister sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 650 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Finlay A. McAlister D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Finlay A. McAlister sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Finlay A. McAlister is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research portfolio spans several subfields including infectious diseases, oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and economics and econometrics.

Their published work covers a range of main topics such as heart failure treatment and management, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, COVID-19 clinical research studies, blood pressure and hypertension studies, cardiovascular function and risk factors, atrial fibrillation management and outcomes, and emergency and acute care studies.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Reduction of dietary sodium to less than 100 mmol in heart failure (SODIUM-HF): an international, open-label, randomised, controlled trial, 2022, The Lancet
  • The MedSafer Study-Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Hospitalized Older Adults, 2022, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Symptoms associated with a positive result for a swab for SARS-CoV-2 infection among children in Alberta, 2020, Canadian Medical Association Journal
  • Worsening Hypertension Awareness, Treatment, and Control Rates in Canadian Women Between 2007 and 2017, 2020, Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • Is There a Sex Gap in Surviving an Acute Coronary Syndrome or Subsequent Development of Heart Failure?, 2020, Circulation

Frequent collaborators in McAlister's research include Justin A. Ezekowitz, Padma Kaul, Erik Youngson, Jeffrey A. Bakal, and Nariman Sepehrvand. This network of coauthors has helped produce a significant volume of research output, highlighting diverse aspects of cardiology and related fields.

McAlister's research is published predominantly in several key venues such as the Canadian Journal of Cardiology, Canadian Medical Association Journal, Journal of Cardiac Failure, CJC Open, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). These journals provide a platform for disseminating work primarily related to cardiovascular health and medical research.

The scientist's main contributions lie within medicine, supported by over 300 publications, with more than a hundred focused specifically on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. The research also touches on infectious diseases and oncology, marking a multidisciplinary approach.

Best Publications

  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Mortality Risk: A Systematic Review

    Marcello Tonelli;Natasha Wiebe;Bruce Culleton;Andrew House

  • Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission: A systematic review of randomized trials

    Finlay A. McAlister;Simon Stewart;Stefania Ferrua;John J.J.V. McMurray

  • Meta-Analysis: Secondary Prevention Programs for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

    Alexander M. Clark;Lisa Hartling;Ben Vandermeer;Finlay A. McAlister

  • Anemia is common in heart failure and is associated with poor outcomes: insights from a cohort of 12 065 patients with new-onset heart failure.

    Justin A. Ezekowitz;Finlay A. McAlister;Paul W. Armstrong

  • Body mass index and mortality in heart failure: a meta-analysis.

    Antigone Oreopoulos;Raj Padwal;Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh;Gregg C. Fonarow

  • Renal Insufficiency and Heart Failure Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications From a Prospective Cohort Study

    Finlay A. McAlister;Justin Ezekowitz;Marcello Tonelli;Paul W. Armstrong

  • Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery: A Large, International, Prospective Cohort Study Establishing Diagnostic Criteria, Characteristics, Predictors, and 30-day Outcomes

    Fernando Botto;Pablo Alonso-Coello;Matthew T V Chan;Matthew T V Chan;Juan Carlos Villar

  • Telemonitoring or structured telephone support programmes for patients with chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Robyn A Clark;Sally C Inglis;Finlay A McAlister;John G F Cleland

  • Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure

    Sally C Inglis;Robyn A Clark;Finlay A McAlister;Jocasta Ball

  • Why Do Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Not Receive Warfarin

    Tammy J. Bungard;William A. Ghali;Koon K. Teo;Finlay A. McAlister

  • A systematic review of randomized trials of disease management programs in heart failure

    Finlay A McAlister;Fiona M.E Lawson;Koon K Teo;Paul W Armstrong

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review.

    Finlay A. McAlister;Justin Ezekowitz;Nicola Hooton;Ben Vandermeer

  • Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale.

    H D Clark;G A Wells;C Huët;F A McAlister

  • Meta-analysis: beta-blocker dose, heart rate reduction, and death in patients with heart failure

    Finlay A McAlister;Natasha Wiebe;Justin A Ezekowitz;Alexander A Leung

  • Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms

    Sharon E. Straus;Finlay A. McAlister

  • Contemporary management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: scientific review.

    Don D. Sin;Finlay A. McAlister;S. F. Paul Man;Nick R. Anthonisen

  • Accuracy of administrative databases in identifying patients with hypertension.

    Karen Tu;Norman Rc Campbell;Zhong-Liang Chen;Karen J Cauch-Dudek

  • Improved clinical outcomes associated with metformin in patients with diabetes and heart failure.

    Dean T. Eurich;Sumit R. Majumdar;Finlay A. McAlister;Ross T. Tsuyuki

  • Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control in national surveys from England, the USA and Canada, and correlation with stroke and ischaemic heart disease mortality: a cross-sectional study

    Michel Joffres;Emanuela Falaschetti;Cathleen Gillespie;Cynthia Robitaille

  • A meta-analysis of the effect of exercise training on left ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients: the benefit depends on the type of training performed.

    Mark J. Haykowsky;Yuanyuan Liang;David Pechter;Lee W. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Justin A. Ezekowitz
Justin A. Ezekowitz University of Alberta
Sumit R. Majumdar
Sumit R. Majumdar University of Alberta
Ross T. Tsuyuki
Ross T. Tsuyuki University of Alberta
Hude Quan
Hude Quan University of Calgary
Paul W. Armstrong
Paul W. Armstrong University of Alberta
Brian H. Rowe
Brian H. Rowe University of Alberta
Raj Padwal
Raj Padwal University of Alberta
Brenda R. Hemmelgarn
Brenda R. Hemmelgarn University of Calgary
Jeffrey A. Johnson
Jeffrey A. Johnson University of Alberta
William A. Ghali
William A. Ghali University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in flexible study options or expedited routes into healthcare, a wide range of online nursing and advanced practice degrees are available. Among these, the shortest dnp program online pathways attract many seeking to accelerate their clinical leadership credentials. Additionally, those prioritizing ease of access often research the shortest dnp program options for a fast-tracked Doctor of Nursing Practice degree.

For students aiming to enter the workforce quickly, fast track lpn programs offer streamlined training to become Licensed Practical Nurses through online coursework. Aspiring nurse practitioners can also benefit from innovative bsn to np programs online, many of which focus on areas like psychiatric mental health and can be completed in less time than traditional paths.

Exploring these online degree options provides greater flexibility and may reduce the time needed to advance your medical or healthcare career in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Finlay A. McAlister

Trending Scientists