What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Particle physics
- Quantum mechanics
- Nuclear physics
His primary areas of study are Particle physics, Electron–positron annihilation, Nuclear physics, Branching fraction and Particle decay.
His study looks at the relationship between Particle physics and topics such as Lepton, which overlap with Muon.
His research investigates the connection between Electron–positron annihilation and topics such as Invariant mass that intersect with issues in Atomic physics.
Nuclear physics and Photon are commonly linked in his work.
His Branching fraction research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Resonance, X, Photon energy, Analytical chemistry and Semileptonic decay.
His study looks at the relationship between Particle decay and fields such as Annihilation, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
His most cited work include:
- Indication of Electron Neutrino Appearance from an Accelerator-produced Off-axis Muon Neutrino Beam (1090 citations)
- The BABAR detector (738 citations)
- Evidence for an excess of B̄→D( *)τ -ν ̄τ decays (550 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Particle physics, Nuclear physics, Electron–positron annihilation, Branching fraction and B meson.
His research on Particle physics often connects related areas such as Lepton.
His Nuclear physics research includes elements of Resonance and Asymmetry.
His study looks at the intersection of Electron–positron annihilation and topics like Dalitz plot with Amplitude.
The Branching fraction study combines topics in areas such as Particle identification, Crystallography, Particle decay, Analytical chemistry and Semileptonic decay.
His studies in Particle decay integrate themes in fields like Pair production and Baryon.
He most often published in these fields:
- Particle physics (62.81%)
- Nuclear physics (49.82%)
- Electron–positron annihilation (41.34%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?
- Nuclear physics (49.82%)
- Particle physics (62.81%)
- Neutrino (5.21%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Nuclear physics, Particle physics, Neutrino, Electron–positron annihilation and CP violation.
His Nuclear physics study frequently intersects with other fields, such as Cross section.
His study in Branching fraction, Asymmetry, B meson, Hadron and Muon falls within the category of Particle physics.
His Branching fraction research incorporates themes from Charmed baryons and Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix.
His Neutrino study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Energy and Electron.
His research integrates issues of BaBar experiment, Radiation, Resonance and Photon in his study of Electron–positron annihilation.
Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Measurement of an excess of B̄→D(*) τ-ν̄τ decays and implications for charged Higgs bosons (513 citations)
- Observation of Electron Neutrino Appearance in a Muon Neutrino Beam (415 citations)
- Search for a dark photon in e(+)e(-) collisions at BABAR. (310 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Quantum mechanics
- Particle physics
- Electron
His scientific interests lie mostly in Nuclear physics, Particle physics, Neutrino, Neutrino oscillation and Electron–positron annihilation.
His study on Nuclear physics is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Resonance.
His work on Particle physics deals in particular with CP violation, Muon neutrino, Pion, Asymmetry and BaBar experiment.
W. H. Toki interconnects Scattering and Oscillation in the investigation of issues within Neutrino oscillation.
His research in Electron–positron annihilation intersects with topics in Radiation and Photon.
He works mostly in the field of Branching fraction, limiting it down to topics relating to Hadron and, in certain cases, Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
