World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wim Van Criekinge

Wim Van Criekinge

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
72
Citations
15698
World Ranking
6418
National Ranking
110

Wim Van Criekinge publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim Van Criekinge sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 238 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Wim Van Criekinge D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim Van Criekinge sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wim Van Criekinge is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and conducts research primarily within the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields including Molecular Biology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and Oncology.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas related to cancer and molecular biology. Key focus areas include:

  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research

Van Criekinge has contributed to multiple publications in a variety of research venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • The Journal of Urology (7 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (5 publications)
  • Clinical Epigenetics (2 publications)
  • Nucleic Acids Research (2 publications)
  • European Urology Open Science (2 publications)

Some of Van Criekinge's recent papers are:

  • "Challenges in neoantigen-directed therapeutics," 2022, published in Cancer Cell
  • "Clinical use of the SelectMDx urinary-biomarker test with or without mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: a prospective, multicenter study in biopsy-naïve men," 2021, published in Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
  • "PhaLP: A Database for the Study of Phage Lytic Proteins and Their Evolution," 2021, published in Viruses
  • "Spectral Prediction Features as a Solution for the Search Space Size Problem in Proteogenomics," 2021, published in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
  • "Evaluation of the New American Urological Association Guidelines Risk Classification for Hematuria," 2020, published in The Journal of Urology

Van Criekinge collaborates extensively, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Steff Taelman
  • Michiel Stock
  • Ellen C. Zwarthoff
  • Joost L. Boormans
  • Joep J. de Jong

Best Publications

  • Analysis of DNA methylation in cancer: location revisited

    Alexander Koch;Sophie C. Joosten;Zheng Feng;Tim C. de Ruijter

  • The Zinc Finger Protein A20 Inhibits TNF-induced NF-κB–dependent Gene Expression by Interfering with an RIP- or TRAF2-mediated Transactivation Signal and Directly Binds to a Novel NF-κB–inhibiting Protein ABIN

    Karen Heyninck;Dirk De Valck;Wim Vanden Berghe;Wim Van Criekinge

  • Comparing the DNA hypermethylome with gene mutations in human colorectal cancer.

    Kornel E. Schuebel;Wei Chen;Leslie Cope;Sabine C. Glöckner

  • Detection of High-grade Prostate Cancer Using a Urinary Molecular Biomarker–Based Risk Score

    Leander Van Neste;Rianne J Hendriks;Siebren Dijkstra;Geert Trooskens

  • Telomere length and cardiovascular risk factors in a middle‐aged population free of overt cardiovascular disease

    Sofie Bekaert;Tim De Meyer;Ernst R. Rietzschel;Marc L. De Buyzere

  • MEXPRESS: visualizing expression, DNA methylation and clinical TCGA data

    Alexander K. Koch;Tim De Meyer;Jana Jeschke;Wim Van Criekinge

  • Quantitation of Promoter Methylation of Multiple Genes in Urine DNA and Bladder Cancer Detection

    Mohammad Obaidul Hoque;Shahnaz Begum;Ozlem Topaloglu;Aditi Chatterjee

  • NMR-Based Characterization of Metabolic Alterations in Hypertension Using an Adaptive, Intelligent Binning Algorithm

    Tim De Meyer;Davy Sinnaeve;Bjorn Van Gasse;Elena Tsiporkova

  • The N-myc downstream regulated gene (NDRG) family: diverse functions, multiple applications

    Veerle Melotte;Xianghu Qu;Maté Ongenaert;Wim van Criekinge

  • Quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction gene patterns in urine sediment distinguish prostate cancer patients from control subjects.

    Mohammad Obaidul Hoque;Ozlem Topaloglu;Shahnaz Begum;Rui Henrique

  • Yeast Two-Hybrid: State of the Art.

    Wim Van Criekinge;Rudi Beyaert

  • Clinical utility of an epigenetic assay to detect occult prostate cancer in histopathologically negative biopsies: results of the MATLOC study

    Grant D. Stewart;Leander Van Neste;Philippe Delvenne;Paul Delrée

  • Clinical Validation of an Epigenetic Assay to Predict Negative Histopathological Results in Repeat Prostate Biopsies

    Alan W. Partin;Leander Van Neste;Eric A. Klein;Leonard S. Marks

  • Characterization of seven murine caspase family members.

    Marc Van de Craen;Peter Vandenabeele;Wim Declercq;Ilse Van den Brande

  • The Microbiome in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Trauma-Exposed Controls: An Exploratory Study.

    Sian M.J. Hemmings;Stefanie Malan-Müller;Leigh L. van den Heuvel;Brittany A. Demmitt

  • GATA4 and GATA5 are Potential Tumor Suppressors and Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer

    Debby M.E.I. Hellebrekers;Marjolein H.F.M. Lentjes;Sandra M. van den Bosch;Veerle Melotte

  • Identification and Validation of the Methylated TWIST1 and NID2 Genes through Real-Time Methylation-Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for the Noninvasive Detection of Primary Bladder Cancer in Urine Samples

    Isabelle Renard;Steven Joniau;Ben van Cleynenbreugel;Catherine Collette

  • Paternal age at birth is an important determinant of offspring telomere length

    Tim De Meyer;Ernst R. Rietzschel;Marc L. De Buyzere;Dirk De Bacquer

  • MEXPRESS update 2019

    Alexander Koch;Jana Jeschke;Wim Van Criekinge;Manon van Engeland

  • Phylogenetic trees: visualizing, customizing and detecting incongruence

    Geert Trooskens;David De Beule;Frederik Decouttere;Wim Van Criekinge

Frequent Co-Authors

Manon van Engeland
Manon van Engeland Maastricht University
James G. Herman
James G. Herman University of Pittsburgh
Jack A. Schalken
Jack A. Schalken Radboud University
Jo Vandesompele
Jo Vandesompele Ghent University
Filip Van Nieuwerburgh
Filip Van Nieuwerburgh Ghent University
David J. Harrison
David J. Harrison University of St Andrews
Dieter Deforce
Dieter Deforce Ghent University
Rudi Beyaert
Rudi Beyaert Ghent University
Peter Vandenabeele
Peter Vandenabeele Ghent University
Walter Fiers
Walter Fiers Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a wide variety of online degree and certificate programs in the broader health and life sciences. For example, students interested in mental health careers often consider specialized certificates. The shortest online pmhnp certificate programs offer an efficient way for nurses to become Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners, while the fastest post master's fnp certificate can help working nurses transition to advanced practice roles.

Nutrition is another rewarding field, especially for those with a background in biochemistry. For a comprehensive look at options in this area, check out the best online registered dietitian programs, which can lead to licensure and practice in diverse settings. Finally, if you’re already a nurse looking to advance your academic credentials, the easiest rn to bsn program can help you move up quickly without compromising on quality.

Pursuing an online degree related to Biology and Biochemistry can provide the flexibility to study while working, and open up specialized career tracks in healthcare, nutrition, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Wim Van Criekinge

Trending Scientists