World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Godelieve Gheysen

Godelieve Gheysen

Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Belgium
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 77 499 461 7 7 278 17335
Molecular Biology 76 1164 1037 16 15 236 16236

Godelieve Gheysen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Godelieve Gheysen between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Godelieve Gheysen published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2009. 10 of the 292 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2009. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 3 publications
1981 2025

292 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Godelieve Gheysen: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 4
1991 2
1992 5
1993 7
1994 5
1995 4
1996 5
1997 3
1998 5
1999 5
2000 9
2001 4
2002 6
2003 7
2004 8
2005 13
2006 7
2007 10
2008 6
2009 19
2010 7
2011 9
2012 11
2013 14
2014 13
2015 11
2016 10
2017 10
2018 14
2019 15
2020 9
2021 8
2022 5
2023 5
2024 7
2025 3
Total 292
Download as CSV

Godelieve Gheysen publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Godelieve Gheysen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 276–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 278 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33 278
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Godelieve Gheysen D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Godelieve Gheysen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21 77
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Belgium Leader Award

Overview

Godelieve Gheysen is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has contributed extensively to research in agricultural and biological sciences. Their work primarily focuses on the subfields of plant science, molecular biology, insect science, genetics, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

The main topics in Gheysen's research include:

  • Nematode management and characterization studies
  • Legume nitrogen fixing symbiosis
  • Cassava research and cyanide
  • Plant-microbe interactions and immunity
  • Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • CRISPR and genetic engineering
  • Plant virus research studies

The scientist's recent publications cover a variety of aspects related to plant science and pathology. Notable papers include:

  • Salicylic Acid Biosynthesis in Plants (2020) published in Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Root-knot nematodes induce gall formation by recruiting developmental pathways of post-embryonic organogenesis and regeneration to promote transient pluripotency (2020) published in New Phytologist
  • Pathogens pulling the strings: Effectors manipulating salicylic acid and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis in plants (2021) published in Molecular Plant Pathology
  • The Status under EU Law of Organisms Developed through Novel Genomic Techniques (2021) published in European Journal of Risk Regulation
  • Ascorbate oxidation activates systemic defence against root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola in rice (2020) published in Journal of Experimental Botany

Gheysen has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Molecular Plant Pathology (5 publications)
  • New Phytologist (4 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (4 publications)
  • Frontiers in Plant Science (2 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (2 publications)

Frequent collaborators in Gheysen's research include Lander Bauters, Boris Stojilković, Tina Kyndt, Yannong Xiao, and Xueqiong Xiao, with several joint publications reflecting a collaborative approach in interdisciplinary plant science research.

Best Publications

  • Salicylic Acid Biosynthesis in Plants

    Hannes Lefevere;Lander Bauters;Godelieve Gheysen

  • The tify family previously known as ZIM.

    Bartel Vanholme;Wim Grunewald;Alex Bateman;Takayuki Kohchi

  • GENE EXPRESSION IN NEMATODE FEEDING SITES

    Godelieve Gheysen;Carmen Fenoll

  • The Jasmonate Pathway Is a Key Player in Systemically Induced Defense against Root Knot Nematodes in Rice

    Kamrun Nahar;Tina Kyndt;David de Vleesschauwer;Monica M. Hofte

  • Suppression of beta-1,3-glucanase transgene expression in homozygous plants.

    F de Carvalho;G Gheysen;S Kushnir;M Van Montagu

  • How nematodes manipulate plant development pathways for infection.

    Godelieve Gheysen;Melissa G Mitchum

  • The genome of cultivated sweet potato contains Agrobacterium T-DNAs with expressed genes: An example of a naturally transgenic food crop

    Tina Kyndt;Dora Quispe;Dora Quispe;Hong Zhai;Robert Jarret

  • Genomics and Molecular Genetics of Plant-Nematode Interactions

    John Jones;Godelieve Gheysen;Carmen Fenoll

  • Functional roles of effectors of plant-parasitic nematodes.

    Annelies Haegeman;Sophie Mantelin;John T. Jones;Godelieve Gheysen

  • Hormone defense networking in rice: tales from a different world

    David De Vleesschauwer;Godelieve Gheysen;Monica Höfte

  • Transcription factor WRKY23 assists auxin distribution patterns during Arabidopsis root development through local control on flavonol biosynthesis

    Wim Grunewald;Ive De Smet;Daniel R. Lewis;Christian Löfke

  • Illegitimate recombination in plants: a model for T-DNA integration.

    Unknown

  • Determination of the Processing Sites of an Arabidopsis 2S Albumin and Characterization of the Complete Gene Family

    Enno Krebbers;Lydia Herdies;Ann De Clercq;Jef Seurinck

  • Molecular markers and cell cycle inhibitors show the importance of cell cycle progression in nematode-induced galls and syncytia.

    Janice de Almeida Engler;Vera De Vleesschauwer;Sylvia Burssens;John L. Celenza

  • Characterization of a plant scaffold attachment region in a DNA fragment that normalizes transgene expression in tobacco.

    P Breyne;M van Montagu;N Depicker;G Gheysen

  • Expression of the Arabidopsis jasmonate signalling repressor JAZ1/TIFY10A is stimulated by auxin

    Wim Grunewald;Bartel Vanholme;Bartel Vanholme;Laurens Pauwels;Laurens Pauwels;Eva Plovie;Eva Plovie

  • Nematode feeding sites: unique organs in plant roots

    Tina Kyndt;Paulo Vieira;Paulo Vieira;Godelieve Gheysen;Janice de Almeida-Engler

  • Parasitic Nematodes Modulate PIN-Mediated Auxin Transport to Facilitate Infection

    Wim Grunewald;Bernard Cannoot;Jiří Friml;Godelieve Gheysen

  • An endosymbiotic bacterium in a plant-parasitic nematode: member of a new Wolbachia supergroup.

    Annelies Haegeman;Bartel Vanholme;Joachim Jacob;Tom T.M. Vandekerckhove

  • Transcriptional reprogramming by root knot and migratory nematode infection in rice.

    Tina Kyndt;Simon Denil;Annelies Haegeman;Geert Trooskens

  • Secretions of plant-parasitic nematodes: a molecular update.

    Bartel Vanholme;Jan De Meutter;Tom Tytgat;Marc Van Montagu

  • Tissue-specific and pathogen-induced regulation of a Nicotiana plumbaginifolia beta-1,3-glucanase gene.

    C Castresana;F de Carvalho;G Gheysen;M Habets

Frequent Co-Authors

Tina Kyndt
Tina Kyndt Ghent University
Annelies Haegeman
Annelies Haegeman Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek
Monica Höfte
Monica Höfte Ghent University
Dirk Inzé
Dirk Inzé Ghent University
Kristof Demeestere
Kristof Demeestere Ghent University
John T. Jones
John T. Jones James Hutton Institute
Andreas Niebel
Andreas Niebel Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Wim Van Criekinge
Wim Van Criekinge Ghent University
Tom Beeckman
Tom Beeckman Ghent University
Gilbert Engler
Gilbert Engler INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career advancements in healthcare and science. For students considering a shift to nursing, direct entry msn programs allow those without a nursing background to pursue a Master of Science in Nursing efficiently, making this a promising pathway for biology graduates.

Choosing the right institution is also vital. If you are comparing accredited online universities, you may want to explore which school is better snhu vs wgu, considering factors like flexibility, reputation, and cost. Both schools offer robust options for science and healthcare-focused online degrees.

Molecular Biology graduates who have already earned registered nurse credentials might benefit from rn to bsn to msn online programs, which offer an affordable bridge to advanced nursing roles. These programs are ideal for accelerating career growth while building on existing scientific knowledge.

Finally, it is important to select an institution with a strong reputation. By choosing a non profit online university, you often gain access to rigorous, high-quality degrees that are widely recognized by employers. Explore your options to maximize the impact of your Molecular Biology background.

Best Scientists Citing Godelieve Gheysen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles