World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
7363
World Ranking
7620
National Ranking
3302

Marco Aurélio Gerosa publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Aurélio Gerosa sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 243 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marco Aurélio Gerosa D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Aurélio Gerosa sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marco Aurélio Gerosa is affiliated with Northern Arizona University in the United States. Their primary research area lies within Computer Science, encompassing a total of 142 publications. The main subfields of study include Information Systems, Computer Science Applications, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, and Communication.

The scientist's research extensively covers topics related to software engineering and artificial intelligence in human-computer interactions. Key topics investigated by Gerosa comprise:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Wikis in Education and Collaboration

Gerosa has contributed to a variety of publication venues, frequently appearing in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • IEEE Software
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

Recent published papers exemplify the breadth of their work. These include:

  • "The Shifting Sands of Motivation: Revisiting What Drives Contributors in Open Source," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Women's Participation in Open Source Software: A Survey of the Literature," 2022, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • "How Should My Chatbot Interact? A Survey on Social Characteristics in Human-Chatbot Interaction Design," 2020, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • "How Do Software Developers Use GitHub Actions to Automate Their Workflows?" 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Chatbots Language Design: The Influence of Language Variation on User Experience with Tourist Assistant Chatbots," 2022, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Frequent collaboration has been established with various coauthors, including Igor Steinmacher, Anita Sarma, Igor Wiese, Bianca Trinkenreich, and Mairieli Wessel. These collaborations indicate active engagement in the research community and interdisciplinary work related to software engineering and open source software.

Best Publications

  • How should my chatbot interact? A survey on human-chatbot interaction design.

    Ana Paula Chaves;Marco Aurélio Gerosa

  • Social Barriers Faced by Newcomers Placing Their First Contribution in Open Source Software Projects

    Igor Steinmacher;Tayana Conte;Marco Aurélio Gerosa;David Redmiles

  • Software Platforms for Smart Cities: Concepts, Requirements, Challenges, and a Unified Reference Architecture

    Eduardo Felipe Zambom Santana;Ana Paula Chaves;Marco Aurelio Gerosa;Fabio Kon

  • A systematic literature review on the barriers faced by newcomers to open source software projects

    Igor Steinmacher;Marco Aurelio Graciotto Silva;Marco Aurelio Gerosa;David F. Redmiles

  • Service-oriented middleware for the Future Internet: state of the art and research directions

    Valérie Issarny;Nikolaos Georgantas;Sara Hachem;Apostolos Zarras

  • Applying the 3C Model to Groupware Development

    Hugo Fuks;Alberto Barbosa Raposo;Marco Aurélio Gerosa;Carlos José Pereira de Lucena

  • Overcoming open source project entry barriers with a portal for newcomers

    Igor Steinmacher;Tayana Uchoa Conte;Christoph Treude;Marco Aurelio Gerosa

  • The Power of Bots: Characterizing and Understanding Bots in OSS Projects

    Mairieli Wessel;Bruno Mendes de Souza;Igor Steinmacher;Igor S. Wiese

  • The 3C Collaboration Model

    Hugo Fuks;Alberto Raposo;Marco A. Gerosa;Mariano Pimental

  • The Development and Application of Distance Learning Courses on the Internet

    Hugo Fuks;Marco Aurelio Gerosa;Carlos Jose Pereira de Lucena

  • Why is programming so difficult to learn?: Patterns of Difficulties Related to Programming Learning Mid-Stage

    Yorah Bosse;Marco Aurélio Gerosa

  • More Common Than You Think: An In-depth Study of Casual Contributors

    Gustavo Pinto;Igor Steinmacher;Marco Aurelio Gerosa

  • How Should My Chatbot Interact? A Survey on Social Characteristics in Human–Chatbot Interaction Design

    Ana Paula Chaves;Ana Paula Chaves;Marco Aurelio Gerosa

  • Why do newcomers abandon open source software projects

    Igor Steinmacher;Igor Wiese;Ana Paula Chaves;Marco Aurelio Gerosa

  • Engenharia de Groupware: Desenvolvimento de Aplicações Colaborativas

    Hugo Fuks;Alberto B. Raposo;Marco Aurélio Gerosa

  • On-demand Developer Documentation

    Martin P. Robillard;Andrian Marcus;Christoph Treude;Gabriele Bavota

  • Awareness Support in Distributed Software Development: A Systematic Review and Mapping of the Literature

    Igor Steinmacher;Ana Paula Chaves;Marco Aurélio Gerosa

  • Newcomers’ Barriers. . . Is That All? An Analysis of Mentors’ and Newcomers’ Barriers in OSS Projects

    Sogol Balali;Igor Steinmacher;Igor Steinmacher;Umayal Annamalai;Anita Sarma

  • Almost there: a study on quasi-contributors in open source software projects

    Igor Steinmacher;Gustavo Pinto;Igor Scaliante Wiese;Marco Aurelio Gerosa

  • Inter- and intra-relationships between communication coordination and cooperation in the scope of the 3C Collaboration Model

    H. Fuks;A. Raposo;M.A. Gerosa;M. Pimentel

  • Awareness support in global software development: a systematic review based on the 3C collaboration model

    Igor Steinmacher;Ana Paula Chaves;Marco Aurelio Gerosa

Frequent Co-Authors

Igor Steinmacher
Igor Steinmacher Northern Arizona University
Carlos José Pereira de Lucena
Carlos José Pereira de Lucena Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
Christoph Treude
Christoph Treude Singapore Management University
Anita Sarma
Anita Sarma Oregon State University
Fabio Kon
Fabio Kon Universidade de São Paulo
Tayana Conte
Tayana Conte Federal University of Amazonas
David Redmiles
David Redmiles University of California, Irvine
Gustavo Pinto
Gustavo Pinto Federal University of Para
Dejan Milojicic
Dejan Milojicic Hewlett-Packard (United States)
Gabriele Bavota
Gabriele Bavota Universita della Svizzera Italiana

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens various routes for learners at every stage. Aspiring professionals may consider associates degree online programs, which offer a fast entry into IT support, web development, or network administration. These flexible courses let you balance studies with other commitments.

For those seeking quick advancement, some students look for the quickest masters degree online. Accelerated options allow you to earn your qualification in just 12-18 months, making it possible to boost your career without a long time commitment.

Career shifters and industry veterans alike often wonder, what masters program should I do? Specializations in data science, cybersecurity, or software engineering are consistently in high demand, promising strong job prospects and competitive salaries.

Lastly, many students opt for easy certifications that pay well to quickly demonstrate skills or shift into new tech fields. These certifications can complement a degree or act as standalone credentials, supporting both rapid career growth and specialization.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Aurélio Gerosa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles