World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
4131
World Ranking
13656
National Ranking
5445

Anita Sarma publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anita Sarma sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 161 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Anita Sarma D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anita Sarma sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Palantir: raising awareness among configuration management workspaces

    Anita Sarma;Zahra Noroozi;André van der Hoek

  • Tesseract: Interactive visual exploration of socio-technical relationships in software development

    Anita Sarma;Larry Maccherone;Patrick Wagstrom;James Herbsleb

  • The onion patch: migration in open source ecosystems

    Corey Jergensen;Anita Sarma;Patrick Wagstrom

  • What's Wrong with Computational Notebooks? Pain Points, Needs, and Design Opportunities

    Unknown

  • Palantir: Early Detection of Development Conflicts Arising from Parallel Code Changes

    A. Sarma;D. F. Redmiles;A. van der Hoek

  • Open source barriers to entry, revisited: a sociotechnical perspective

    Christopher Mendez;Hema Susmita Padala;Zoe Steine-Hanson;Claudia Hilderbrand

  • Palantir: raising awareness among configuration management workspaces

    Unknown

  • Gender-Inclusiveness Personas vs. Stereotyping: Can We Have it Both Ways?

    Charles G. Hill;Maren Haag;Alannah Oleson;Chris Mendez

  • Towards supporting awareness of indirect conflicts across software configuration management workspaces

    Anita Sarma;Gerald Bortis;Andre van der Hoek

  • Newcomers’ Barriers. . . Is That All? An Analysis of Mentors’ and Newcomers’ Barriers in OSS Projects

    Sogol Balali;Igor Steinmacher;Igor Steinmacher;Umayal Annamalai;Anita Sarma

  • Continuous coordination a new paradigm to support globally distributed software development projects

    David Redmiles;André Van Der Hoek;Ban Al-Ani;Tobias Hildenbrand

  • Empirical evidence of the benefits of workspace awareness in software configuration management

    Anita Sarma;David Redmiles;André van der Hoek

  • Cassandra: proactive conflict minimization through optimized task scheduling

    Bakhtiar Khan Kasi;Anita Sarma

  • Women's Participation in Open Source Software: A Survey of the Literature.

    Bianca Trinkenreich;Igor Wiese;Anita Sarma;Marco Aurélio Gerosa

  • The Shifting Sands of Motivation: Revisiting What Drives Contributors in Open Source

    Marco Gerosa;Igor Wiese;Bianca Trinkenreich;Georg Link

  • Hidden Figures: Roles and Pathways of Successful OSS Contributors

    Bianca Trinkenreich;Mariam Guizani;Igor Wiese;Anita Sarma

  • The Signals that Potential Contributors Look for When Choosing Open-source Projects

    Huilian Sophie Qiu;Yucen Lily Li;Susmita Padala;Anita Sarma

  • Towards Awareness in the Large

    A. Sarma;A. van der Hoek

  • A Survey of Collaborative Tools in Software Development

    Anita Sarma;Donald Bren

  • Cassandra: Proactive Conflict Minimizationthrough Optimized Task Scheduling

    Bakhtiar Khan Kasi;Anita Sarma

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret Burnett
Margaret Burnett Oregon State University
Igor Steinmacher
Igor Steinmacher Northern Arizona University
Marco Aurélio Gerosa
Marco Aurélio Gerosa Northern Arizona University
André van der Hoek
André van der Hoek University of California, Irvine
David Redmiles
David Redmiles University of California, Irvine
Gregg Rothermel
Gregg Rothermel North Carolina State University
James D. Herbsleb
James D. Herbsleb Carnegie Mellon University
Rafael Prikladnicki
Rafael Prikladnicki Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Myra B. Cohen
Myra B. Cohen Iowa State University
Sebastian Elbaum
Sebastian Elbaum University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Anita Sarma