World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
7923
World Ranking
8771
National Ranking
3751

Myra B. Cohen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Myra B. Cohen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 118 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Myra B. Cohen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Myra B. Cohen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Myra B. Cohen is affiliated with Iowa State University in the United States. Their primary fields of study encompass Computer Science and Engineering, with a focus on the intersections of these disciplines. The main subfields covered in their research include Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Information Systems, and Software.

Their research addresses several topics within these domains, such as:

  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Gut microbiota and health

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Myra B. Cohen has coauthored multiple publications with Mikaela Cashman, Alexis L. Marsh, Michael C. Gerten, Justyna Petke, and James I. Lathrop.

The venues where they have published regularly include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Microbiology Spectrum

Recent publications by Myra B. Cohen cover a variety of interdisciplinary subjects and include:

  • "Metabolic Synergy between Human Symbionts Bacteroides and Methanobrevibacter", 2022, Microbiology Spectrum
  • "Metabolic Feedback Inhibition Influences Metabolite Secretion by the Human Gut Symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron", 2020, mSystems
  • "HyperGI: Automated Detection and Repair of Information Flow Leakage", 2021, 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)
  • "Towards Real-Time Safety Analysis of Small Unmanned Aerial Systems in the National Airspace", 2022, AIAA AVIATION 2022 Forum
  • "An empirical investigation of organic software product lines", 2021, Empirical Software Engineering

Among their recognitions, Myra B. Cohen was awarded the ACM Distinguished Member status in 2017.

Best Publications

  • An orchestrated survey of methodologies for automated software test case generation

    Saswat Anand;Edmund K. Burke;Tsong Yueh Chen;John Clark

  • Constructing test suites for interaction testing

    Myra B. Cohen;Peter B. Gibbons;Warwick B. Mugridge;Charles J. Colbourn

  • Covering arrays for efficient fault characterization in complex configuration spaces

    C. Yilmaz;M.B. Cohen;A.A. Porter

  • Constructing Interaction Test Suites for Highly-Configurable Systems in the Presence of Constraints: A Greedy Approach

    M.B. Cohen;M.B. Dwyer;Jiangfan Shi

  • Interaction testing of highly-configurable systems in the presence of constraints

    Myra B. Cohen;Matthew B. Dwyer;Jiangfan Shi

  • Evaluating improvements to a meta-heuristic search for constrained interaction testing

    Brady J. Garvin;Myra B. Cohen;Matthew B. Dwyer

  • GUI Interaction Testing: Incorporating Event Context

    Xun Yuan;M. B. Cohen;A. M. Memon

  • Configuration-aware regression testing: an empirical study of sampling and prioritization

    Xiao Qu;Myra B. Cohen;Gregg Rothermel

  • Combinatorial Interaction Regression Testing: A Study of Test Case Generation and Prioritization

    Xiao Qu;M.B. Cohen;K.M. Woolf

  • A variable strength interaction testing of components

    M.B. Cohen;P.B. Gibbons;W.B. Mugridge;C.J. Colbourn

  • A deterministic density algorithm for pairwise interaction coverage.

    Charles J. Colbourn;Myra B. Cohen;Renée Turban

  • Coverage and adequacy in software product line testing

    Myra B. Cohen;Matthew B. Dwyer;Jiangfan Shi

  • A framework of greedy methods for constructing interaction test suites

    Renée C. Bryce;Charles J. Colbourn;Myra B. Cohen

  • Augmenting simulated annealing to build interaction test suites

    M.B. Cohen;C.J. Colbourn;A.C.H. Ling

  • Constructing strength three covering arrays with augmented annealing

    Myra B. Cohen;Charles J. Colbourn;Alan C. H. Ling

  • Study of the outcome of patients transferred to a level I hospital after stabilization at an outlying hospital in a rural setting.

    Frederick B. Rogers;Turner M. Osler;Steven R. Shackford;Myra Cohen

  • Designing Test Suites for Software Interactions Testing

    Myra B Cohen

  • Directed test suite augmentation: techniques and tradeoffs

    Zhihong Xu;Yunho Kim;Moonzoo Kim;Gregg Rothermel

  • Repairing GUI Test Suites Using a Genetic Algorithm

    Si Huang;Myra B. Cohen;Atif M. Memon

  • Efficiency and early fault detection with lower and higher strength combinatorial interaction testing

    Justyna Petke;Shin Yoo;Myra B. Cohen;Mark Harman

  • An Improved Meta-heuristic Search for Constrained Interaction Testing

    Brady J. Garvin;Myra B. Cohen;Matthew B. Dwyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles J. Colbourn
Charles J. Colbourn Arizona State University
Matthew B. Dwyer
Matthew B. Dwyer University of Virginia
Gregg Rothermel
Gregg Rothermel North Carolina State University
Atif M. Memon
Atif M. Memon University of Maryland, College Park
Adam Porter
Adam Porter University of Maryland, College Park
Steven R. Shackford
Steven R. Shackford Scripps Health
Yuriy Brun
Yuriy Brun University of Massachusetts Amherst
Luciano Baresi
Luciano Baresi Polytechnic University of Milan
Bradley Schmerl
Bradley Schmerl Carnegie Mellon University
Franco Zambonelli
Franco Zambonelli University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to numerous education and career options. Aside from traditional degrees, students have flexible online pathways that can accelerate both skill-building and job readiness.

For those eager to boost their earnings quickly, consider quick certifications that pay well. These programs often focus on high-demand tech skills and can be completed in just a few months, making them a smart move for career changers or those needing immediate credentials.

If you're aiming for advanced expertise, the quickest masters degree online programs offer a fast track to a graduate credential. Such programs are designed for efficiency without sacrificing academic quality, often appealing to working professionals.

Unsure which advanced degree to choose? Check out these options for the best masters degree to get, where you’ll find in-demand disciplines that promise strong return on investment and job security.

Not ready for a bachelor’s or master’s? An online associate degree in computer science can provide fundamental skills and a pathway to entry-level roles or even further study—all with maximum flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Myra B. Cohen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles