World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steven R. Shackford

Steven R. Shackford

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
22946
World Ranking
15708
National Ranking
7905

Steven R. Shackford publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven R. Shackford sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 279 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Steven R. Shackford D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven R. Shackford sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven R. Shackford is affiliated with Scripps Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine, with subfields in Surgery and Emergency Medicine. The main topics in their work include Trauma and Emergency Care Studies, Abdominal Trauma and Injuries, and Trauma Management and Diagnosis.

The scientist has contributed to multiple publications, particularly in the following venues:

  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (2 publications)

Among their recent papers are:

  • Thomas Hull Cogbill, MD, FACS, December 17, 1952 to December 31, 2022 (2023), published in The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
  • In memory of Dr. David Feliciano (2024), published in The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Ernest E. Moore
  • Thomas M. Scalea
  • C. William Schwab

Best Publications

  • Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision).

    Ernest E. Moore;Thomas H. Cogbill;Gregory J. Jurkovich;Steven R. Shackford

  • Organ Injury Scaling

    Ernest E. Moore;Thomas H. Cogbill;Mark A. Malangoni;Gregory J. Jurkovich

  • Status of nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries in 1995: a multicenter experience with 404 patients.

    H L Pachter;M M Knudson;B Esrig;S Ross

  • Blunt carotid artery dissection: incidence, associated injuries, screening, and treatment.

    James W. Davis;Troy L. Holbrook;David B. Hoyt;Robert C. Mackersie

  • The effect of hypotension and hypoxia on children with severe head injuries

    Frank A. Pigula;Steven L. Wald;Steven R. Shackford;Dennis W. Vane

  • The Epidemiology of Traumatic Death: A Population-Based Analysis

    Steven R. Shackford;Robert C. Mackersie;Troy L. Holbrook;James W. Davis

  • The clinical utility of computed tomographic scanning and neurologic examination in the management of patients with minor head injuries.

    S R Shackford;S L Wald;S L Wald;S E Ross;S E Ross;T H Cogbill;T H Cogbill

  • Complications in Surgical Patients

    Mark A. Healey;Steven R. Shackford;Turner M. Osler;Frederick B. Rogers

  • Base deficit as a guide to volume resuscitation.

    James W. Davis;Steven R. Shackford;Robert C. Mackersie;David B. Hoyt

  • The spectrum of blunt injury to the carotid artery: a multicenter perspective

    T. H. Cogbill;E. E. Moore;M. Meissner;Ronald P. Fischer

  • Organ injury scaling. III: Chest wall, abdominal vascular, ureter, bladder, and urethra.

    Ernest E. Moore;Thomas H. Cogbill;Gregory J. Jurkovich;Jack W. McAninch

  • Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score: motor score alone is a better predictor.

    C. Healey;Turner M. Osler;Frederick B. Rogers;Mark A. Healey

  • Nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma: a multicenter experience.

    Thomas H. Cogbill;Ernest E. Moore;Gregory J. Jurkovich;John A. Morris

  • Death in the operating room : an analysis of a multi-center experience

    David B. Hoyt;Eileen M. Bulger;M. Margaret Knudson;John Morris

  • Impact of a Trauma System on Outcome of Severely Injured Patients

    Shackford;Mackersie Rc;Hoyt Db;Baxt Wg

  • Focused abdominal sonogram for trauma: the learning curve of nonradiologist clinicians in detecting hemoperitoneum.

    Steven R. Shackford;Frederick B. Rogers;Turner M. Osler;Mario E. Trabulsy

  • Venous thromboembolism in patients with major trauma

    Steven R. Shackford;James W. Davis;Peggy Hollingsworth-Fridlund;Nancy S. Brewer

  • The deleterious effects of intraoperative hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head injuries.

    John A. Pietropaoli;Frederick B. Rogers;Steven R. Shackford;Steven L. Wald

  • Implications of admission hypothermia in trauma patients.

    Susan Steinemann;Steven R. Shackford;James W. Davis

  • Against empathy: The case for rational compassion.

    Steven R Shackford

Frequent Co-Authors

David B. Hoyt
David B. Hoyt American College of Surgeons
Ernest E. Moore
Ernest E. Moore University of Colorado Denver
Gregory J. Jurkovich
Gregory J. Jurkovich University of California, Davis
Ronald V. Maier
Ronald V. Maier University of Washington
Myra B. Cohen
Myra B. Cohen Iowa State University
Jack W. McAninch
Jack W. McAninch University of California, San Francisco
John A. Morris
John A. Morris Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Thomas M. Scalea
Thomas M. Scalea University of Maryland, Baltimore
Christopher K. Zarins
Christopher K. Zarins Stanford University
Steven R. Garfin
Steven R. Garfin University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers, both in clinical settings and supportive health fields. If you’re seeking flexible or affordable ways to enter the healthcare industry, online degrees offer practical alternatives.

For those interested in data and technology, an online bachelor's in health information management can lead to roles managing patient records, healthcare databases, and compliance with regulations.

Many students are also considering allied health roles such as medical billing and coding. Wondering how much does it cost to become a medical coder? Online programs make it possible to train affordably and quickly for these in-demand positions.

Those aiming for advanced clinical responsibilities might explore nurse practitioner programs, which offer graduate-level training online and diverse specialties.

If you want to become a registered nurse, there are numerous affordable nursing programs online that blend theory with practical experience.

These pathways provide accessible, flexible options for starting or advancing your healthcare career—all from the convenience of home.

Best Scientists Citing Steven R. Shackford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles