World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 110 5560 5224 2993 2775 495 45081

Ronald V. Maier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ronald V. Maier between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ronald V. Maier published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2000. 7 of the 522 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2000. 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 5 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 16 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 28 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
1979 2025

522 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ronald V. Maier: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 2
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 3
1984 4
1985 1
1986 5
1987 3
1988 7
1989 5
1990 8
1991 6
1992 13
1993 5
1994 7
1995 16
1996 14
1997 16
1998 10
1999 12
2000 28
2001 17
2002 18
2003 13
2004 21
2005 18
2006 21
2007 19
2008 18
2009 13
2010 9
2011 10
2012 18
2013 18
2014 13
2015 13
2016 15
2017 19
2018 11
2019 10
2020 20
2021 14
2022 12
2023 9
2024 3
2025 4
Total 522
Download as CSV

Ronald V. Maier publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald V. Maier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 495 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 495
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ronald V. Maier D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald V. Maier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429 110
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Ronald V. Maier is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine, specifically in Surgery and Emergency Medicine. Their scholarly output includes significant work related to trauma, emergency care, and surgical outcomes.

Their research covers several subfields such as Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. The main topics of their work include Trauma and Emergency Care Studies, Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management, Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries, Abdominal Trauma and Injuries, Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes, Diverticular Disease and Complications, as well as Hernia repair and management.

The scientist has been frequently published in the following venues:

  • World Journal of Emergency Surgery
  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
  • Annals of Surgery
  • Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
  • JAMA Surgery

Some of the recent publications attributed to Ronald V. Maier include:

  • Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines, 2020, World Journal of Emergency Surgery
  • 2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis, 2020, World Journal of Emergency Surgery
  • 2020 update of the WSES guidelines for the management of acute colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting, 2020, World Journal of Emergency Surgery
  • Perforated and bleeding peptic ulcer: WSES guidelines, 2020, World Journal of Emergency Surgery
  • Acute mesenteric ischemia: updated guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery, 2022, World Journal of Emergency Surgery

Collaborations with other researchers are a notable aspect of their work, with frequent coauthors including Massimo Sartelli, Ernest E. Moore, Luca Ansaloni, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, and Federico Coccolini. These collaborations have likely contributed to the breadth and depth of their research output in emergency surgery and related fields.

Ronald V. Maier has been recognized by peers through the award of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1994.

Best Publications

  • Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases

    Seok Junhee Seok;Shaw Warren H. Shaw Warren;G. Cuenca Alex;N. Mindrinos Michael

  • A network-based analysis of systemic inflammation in humans

    Steve E. Calvano;Wenzhong Xiao;Daniel R. Richards;Ramon M. Felciano

  • Multiple-Organ-Failure Syndrome

    C. James Carrico;Jonathan L. Meakins;J. C. Marshall;Donald Fry

  • A genomic storm in critically injured humans

    Wenzhong Xiao;Wenzhong Xiao;Michael N. Mindrinos;Junhee Seok;Joseph Cuschieri

  • Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines

    Salomone Di Saverio;Salomone Di Saverio;Mauro Podda;Belinda De Simone;Marco Ceresoli

  • Relationship Between Trauma Center Volume and Outcomes

    Avery B. Nathens;Gregory J. Jurkovich;Ronald V. Maier;David C. Grossman

  • Randomized, Prospective Trial of Antioxidant Supplementation in Critically Ill Surgical Patients

    Avery B. Nathens;Margaret J. Neff;Gregory J. Jurkovich;Patricia Klotz

  • The effect of organized systems of trauma care on motor vehicle crash mortality.

    Avery B. Nathens;Gregory J. Jurkovich;Peter Cummings;Frederick P. Rivara

  • Trauma mortality patterns in three nations at different economic levels: implications for global trauma system development

    Charles N. Mock;Gregory J. Jurkovich;David nii-Amon-Kotei;Carlos Arreola-Risa

  • Patterns of Errors Contributing to Trauma Mortality: Lessons Learned From 2594 Deaths

    Russell L. Gruen;Gregory J. Jurkovich;Lisa K. McIntyre;Hugh M. Foy

  • Effectiveness of state trauma systems in reducing injury-related mortality: a national evaluation.

    Avery B. Nathens;Gregory J. Jurkovich;Frederick P. Rivara;Ronald V. Maier

  • Outcome after Hemorrhagic Shock in Trauma Patients

    Susan R. Heckbert;Nicholas B. Vedder;Wilma Hoffman;Robert K. Winn

  • Incidence and effect of hypothermia in seriously injured patients.

    Gregory K. Luna;Ronald V. Maier;Edward G. Pavlin;Doreen Anardi

  • Wses Jerusalem Guidelines For Diagnosis And Treatment Of Acute Appendicitis

    Salomone Di Saverio;Arianna Birindelli;Micheal D. Kelly;Fausto Catena

  • The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections

    Massimo Sartelli;Alain Chichom-Mefire;Francesco M. Labricciosa;Timothy Hardcastle

  • An FFP:PRBC transfusion ratio >/=1:1.5 is associated with a lower risk of mortality after massive transfusion.

    Jason L. Sperry;Juan B. Ochoa;Scott R. Gunn;Louis H. Alarcon

  • Major secondary surgery in blunt trauma patients and perioperative cytokine liberation: determination of the clinical relevance of biochemical markers.

    Hans-Cristoph Pape;Martijn Van Griensven;John Rice;Axel Gänsslen

  • Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients

    Federico Coccolini;Giulia Montori;Fausto Catena;Yoram Kluger

  • Fresh frozen plasma is independently associated with a higher risk of multiple organ failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome

    Gregory A. Watson;Jason L. Sperry;Matthew R. Rosengart;Joseph P. Minei

  • Fat embolism syndrome. A 10-year review

    Eileen M. Bulger;Douglas G. Smith;Ronald V. Maier;Gregory J. Jurkovich

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernest E. Moore
Ernest E. Moore University of Colorado Denver
Gregory J. Jurkovich
Gregory J. Jurkovich University of California, Davis
Frederick P. Rivara
Frederick P. Rivara University of Washington
Lyle L. Moldawer
Lyle L. Moldawer University of Florida
Michael West
Michael West Duke University
Ronald G. Tompkins
Ronald G. Tompkins Harvard University
Timothy R. Billiar
Timothy R. Billiar University of Pittsburgh
Andrew B. Peitzman
Andrew B. Peitzman University of Pittsburgh
Henry V. Baker
Henry V. Baker University of Florida
Wenzhong Xiao
Wenzhong Xiao Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to varied online degrees and health career paths. Modern distance learning allows students to pursue rewarding healthcare roles from anywhere, balancing study with work or personal commitments.

For those interested in managing healthcare organizations, online health administration programs offer flexible options to build skills in health systems management, operations, and leadership. If accreditation is a priority, students should consider cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs to ensure industry recognition and quality standards.

Current registered nurses seeking career advancement may benefit from bridge programs like rn to np, which allow RNs to become nurse practitioners through streamlined online coursework. Alternatively, those interested in holistic and preventative care can specialize with an online nutritionist degree to work in dietetics and health coaching.

Each pathway offers unique opportunities in healthcare, making online learning a practical solution for many aspiring medical professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald V. Maier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles